Prophecies of Mirza IV- Death of his Brother III

Prophecies of Mirza – Death of his Brother III, Saga continues

Preface

We exposed Mirza’s prophecies for the death of his Father and Brother in details. The evidence produced by us proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that Mirza concocted the dates and timing of the Prophecies well after the events. Clear cut proofs of his falsehood. These discrepancies were researched by us to show that Mirza’s prophecies were wrong on factual grounds, giving no chance for the followers of Mirza to refute the evidence produced. They are in the habits of twisting the words and using far fetched explanations for the absurdities of Mirza. But in the case of factual errors in so called revelations of Mirza there is no room left for maneuver.

Most important aspect of it is that it not only proves that Mirza lied and concocted his prophecies, but also that he attributed these lies to Allah SWT. Quadianis otherwise have to explain how Allah SWT (nauzobillah) got the actual dates of these events wrong in the ilhams Mirza claimed he received from Allah SWT.

Mirza claimed Allah SWT corrects his mistakes

Before we start presenting more evidence it is worth pointing to a very bold statement made by Mirza in his book Nur-ul-Haq.

Mirza writes; God never leaves me with mistakes (or forgetting); even for a blink of an eye, He (SWT) also protects me from every mistake and from the satanic touch.

The Arabic words used in this quotation are “Min as-saho (mistakes) Wa Nasian (bad memory/forgetfulness)” meaning either the mistakes or forgetting something or not having accurate memory of an event. Therefore, according to this quotation, Mirza should not be forgetting something revealed to him by Allah SWT. There should be no excuse for him to forget the dates and years of different incidents in his life which he attributed to Allah SWT by claiming them as Divine revelations.

In the presence of such a bold statement it is imperative that the person who made such statement should be clear of all mistakes in the matter of faith and in his alleged revelations, and should be able to prove that his mistakes were corrected by God, immediately.

Actual Source of the years of death

Before we introduce and examine further evidence for the death of his brother, we introduce the actual source for the years of death of his brother and father. This source is responsible for the subsequent corrections carried out by the cult, in the compilation and translation of Tadkirah, the alleged divine book of Quadianis.

Ghulam Murtaza who was a competent Hakim, died in 1876, his son Ghulam Qadir was selected as his successor. Ghulam Qadir was always willing and ready to help the local administration. He received various certificates from the local administrators. He for a period worked as Superintendent of the Local District office. His only son died in his childhood. He adopted his nephew Sultan Ahmed. He (Sultan Ahmed) is considered as the elder of the family after the death of Ghulam Qadir in 1883. Mirza Sultan Ahmed started his job with the Government as Assistant Tehsildar; he now works as Extra Assistant. He is also the administrator (numberdar) of Qadian. Brother of Nizamdin, Imamdin died in 1904, at the time of the siege of Delhi, he was a Risaldar in the Hudson Horse Cavalry. His father Ghulam Mohiudin was a Tehsildar.

This paragraph from the book “Chiefs of Punjab” by Griffin provides the insight and the reasons, why all those after the events corrections were carried out by the cult. Why the compilers and translator of Tadkirah fraudulently either introduced the dates and years to the revelations of Mirza when there was no year mentioned in the actual writings. Or they changed the year of these prophecies where Mirza stupidly introduced wrong years in his so called prophecies. Proof of this from the footnote of one of the prophecy was introduced in our previous article.

Mirza and English Ilhams

Before we discuss the ilhams of November and December 1883, it is our pleasure to introduce a slightly earlier letter to Mir Abbas; this letter has an interesting paragraph. This paragraph is amazing in two senses. First it gives a hilarious example; how this alleged Prophet of “True Islam” asking a Hindu boy in Quadian to check the accuracy of Mirza’s English ilhams before they are sent to the printing press.

Some English sentences were revealed as ilhams, I have sent them to the printing press. There is no one here who knows English, a Hindu boy of Quaidan, studying in Lahore has seen (checked their accuracy) them.

Quranic evidence suggests that Allah SWT decreed that HE has given Quran to Prophet Muhammad SAW in Arabic, his SAW own language so it would be easier for him SAW to understand it and that he SAW can easily convey the glad tidings contains therein, for the benefit of the humanity.

But alas, this self proclaimed false prophet needed a Hindu Boy to check the ilhams for their accuracy before they are sent to the printing press.

Second very interesting side to this bizarre practice by Mirza is that why did he need someone to check the accuracy of the English revelations? Was he expecting some errors in the Word of God (nauzobillah)?

Mirza’s obsession with English Language

We displayed the evidence that Allah SWT decreed to Prophet Muhammad SAW that the Quran is revealed in his SAW own language so he SAW can convey the glad tidings to the God-conscious people.

Mirza made lofty claims about his command of Arabic, which we have every intention to test in the future, but he also was very keen to learn English language.

It is stated by Molvi Sher Ali that Hadarat Messih-e-Maoud once said, I thought I need to learn English for the purpose of tableeq; I am confident that Allah SWT would bestow the knowledge (of English), I just have to pray for a night or two. But then I thought Molvi Muhammad Ali is engaged in (tableeq) this work, his English is praised by others, therefore, my attention was shifted from this (learning English).

It seems this alleged Prophet sub-contracted the work of preaching and spreading the messages he alleged received from his god yalesh, in English to Mohammad Ali.

But what happened, why he needed someone to check his alleged ilhams, supposed Word of Allah SWT (nauzobillah) for accuracy? Why he didn’t learn the English by praying for a night or two? Why Allah SWT didn’t teach English to Mirza after his prayers? Were his prayers turn down by Allah SWT that he has to resort to request a Hindu boy for corrections, for translation and understanding?

We have already presented evidence in our article “Mirza’s attacks on Prophet Isa As” that Mirza thanked his follower for his help in learning English and wanted his help in Hebrew language too. Mirza actually spelled out his novel way to concoct ilhams in different languages and present them as alleged Revelations from God. Mirza wanted to learn how to join the words and make little sentences. This heretic really used the concept of revelations from God as a Child’s play.

There is a subsequent letter to the same person, Mirza writes;

We have another need; I find it difficult to recognize separate/broken words of English. I want a copy which has separate/broken words listed against the words from the book.

Once again a clear cut proof that this heretic wanted to fool the world to create English ilhams, by producing short sentences combining different words. The idiot forgot that in English grammar also plays an important part.

The result is there for all of us to observe, in the shape of woefully crafted English ilhams by Mirza. Ironically, Mirza in his efforts to claim them as divinely revealed ilhams; ended up attributing something to Allah SWT which was erroneous (nauzobillah). This thought can never cross a Muslim’s mind.

No wonder he had been asking help for the accuracy and translations of his so called English revelations, he could copy the words from the books but did not understand the meanings of all the words, never mind the grammar and construction of the sentences. He in his desperation even concocted that some of the ilhams were translated by God. What an absurd idea.

We move along to our main objective.

Death of his Brother, absurdities continue

We in our previous articles established with out shadow of any doubt that Mirza in his books claimed that his brother Ghulam Qadir died in 1887 four years after his actual death in 1883 according to the footnote in Tadkirah.

We also exposed compilers, sons of Mirza and translator of Tadkirah, Mr. Zafrullah Khan.To demonstrate that how they conspired in the compilation of Tadkirah to correct the blunders committed by Mirza on the dates of these Prophecies.

More we investigate more blunders we find in the writings of Mirza. These blunders prove without shadow of any doubts that Mirza was a liar and a fraudster, who tried to claim these prophecies years after the events. But in his stupidity he committed blunders after blunders and ruined his credibility and of those who have compiled and translated Tadkirah as the divine book containing the divine revelations to Mirza.

Brother died in 1881

After announcing his brother’s death in 1887 four years after Ghulam Qadir’s actual death, Mirza in the same book only few pages down from the first quote committed another blunder. Before we expose that blunder let’s test the credibility of “Tadkirah” the divine book again.

Therefore, according to the compilers and translator of tadkirah, Mirza prophecies death of his brother in 1883. Our readers by now are well aware, why this year 1883 is artificially selected by the compilers of tadkirah.

Now we examine the evidence from “Nazool-ul-Masih”; above quote in tadkirah is listed as prophecy number 103;

Once again, clear evidence of fraud by the compilers and translator of tadkirah; Mirza writes this prophecy was told in 1881 and fulfilled the next day. Dear readers, we have come full circle on the issue of death of Mirza’s brother. Mirza have written his brother’s year of death 1881 and 1887. One is two years before the actual death and the other four years after his actual death, according to the evidence displayed.

Irony for the followers of this cult is that Mirza committed these blunders in the same book; just few pages apart.

Further investigation on the death of Mirza’s brother

1- Ilham preceding the illhams for the death

We find something very interesting which shows how desperate this cult was to show and establish credibility of Mirza. They tried that all the alleged ilhams should show 1883 the year of Ghulam Qadir’s death; no matter what the actual evidence is in the writings of Mirza In tadkirah all the ilhams for the death of Ghulam Qadir are listed after following ilham.

Mirza had this ilham at the end of (20th) November 1883; next ilham in Tadkirah is in December on the basis of a letter to Abbas dated 12 December 1883. But the ilham according to the letter were received by Mirza during the week before 12th December. Between these two sets of ilhams, the compilers of Tadkirah have squeezed all the ilhams for the death of his brother. There is only a window of few days available between these two ilhams.

Therefore, brother of Mirza should have died sometime between 20 November 1883, and first week/ start of December.1883.

Curiously in the above quotation Mirza does not think this ilham is for his brother.

Why if his brother was still alive? Especially if the Arabic ilham quoted had the word “Akhi” i.e. brother in it. Why then Mirza never thought that this ilham could be for the death of his actual brother? Even though according to the presentation in Tadkirah, his brother was still alive at the time of this ilham. It is rather odd indeed. When we looked at the original evidence we find something more interesting. The whole of the letter is not included in the tadkirah as ilham; we introduce the last portion of the letter which contains a really interesting paragraph.

2- Original evidence for above ilham

Some part of this quote is included in the translation provided from tadkirah. We translate the remaining portion. Mirza writes;

“My principle is that we should live according to the will of Our Sustainer, whatever He (SWT) Will is better, because He (SWT) is the Dispenser of the grace/affairs. I intend to have a short visit to your town, but this desire wouldn’t be fulfill without the Will of Khuda Talla (Allah SWT). Molvi Abdul Qadir should remember his death, and try to purify his heart, I will also try. (20^th November 1883).

Mirza here is advising Molvi Abdul Qadir to pray to Allah for purity of his heart and remember his death. This sentence sound very familiar indeed.

The date of this letter is 20 November 1883. There is no mention of ilhams concerning his brother in this letter. Also there is no mention that Mirza was in Amritsar at the time he writes this letter.

3-     Evidence displayed in previous Article

We have already dealt with the fraud and deceptions by the compilers of tadkirah regarding the dates in the original writings of Mirza on the evidence reproduced. The purpose to reproduce this evidence is to completely destroy the credibility of Mirza and those who were responsible for composition and translation of tadkirah.

In this ilham Mirza said that his brother died few weeks after the ilham.

The ilhams in Tadkirah are listed in order of the dates. Next ilham quoted in tadkirah after the death of Ghulam Qadir, is the letter to Mir Abbas written on 12 December 1883, but this letter covers the period of a week  in Mirza’s own words. Therefore if we minus a week from 12 December, for the period in which Mirza received these ilhams, then we are left with a window of few days, between the ilhams before and after the ilhams for the death prophecy. His brother must have died in this period; if we go with the chronology in the Tadkirah.

December 1883 Ilham

As it is evident, even though according to the chronology in tadkirah, Ghulam Qadir is dead, on some day between 20 November and 12 December 1883, more like before 5^th of December, as explained above. But Mirza had nothing to say about his brother either about the ilhams he received for his death or his actual death, strange indeed.

Another interesting fact; an ilham which Mirza receive in the first week of December 1883 states; Allah SWT has asked Mirza to go to Amritsar. But according to the evidence repeated in this article, Mirza says he was already in Amritsar when he wrote a letter to his brother informing him of his approaching death, Ghulam Qadir died few weeks afterwards. Unfortunately for this cult according to their chronology Ghulam Qadir is already dead, while Mirza is still in Quadian.

Now we display the remaining part of this letter from the original source.

Mirza writes; This week I received some English ilhams, about some (ilhams) I enquired from the Hindu boy but it is not satisfactory, some were revealed with translation from Allah SWT, some were in Hebrew, these (ilhams) needed research.

In the last paragraph Mirza writes

Please convey my Salam to Molvi Abdul Qadir and Khwaja Ali.

It is abundantly clear that Molvi Abdul Qadir was still alive, after the death of Ghualm Qadir according to the chronology in tadkirah.

Before we move on, we like to point out dishonesty of the compilers of Tadkirah; they left out any mention of Hindu Boy from the Tadkirah.

It also proven that the ilham which says that his brother died few weeks after Mirza wrote the letter is not correct. The evidence and time line is completely against the concoctions and lies of Mirza and the fraud and deceptions of the cult.

Died after few weeks do not fit in the equation, there was hardly few days window available, between the two batches of ilhams produced in tadkirah, before and after the alleged death of Ghulam Qadir.

After careful examination of the internal evidence it is quite obvious that Mirza did not receive any ilhams for the death of his brother between the period from 20 November 1883 and the first week of December 1883. How could it be possible for a man who is writing even the silliest things in his letters to be completely silent on such significant incident as death of his nearest and dearest brother?

It is quite obvious that this cult does not have any such evidence available to them with the dates which can absolve Mirza. Otherwise that evidence would have been proudly displayed in tadkirah and many other places. But lack of any such evidence whatsoever, tells its own story.

During the period between end of 1882 and start of 1884 Mirza regularly wrote letters to Mir Abbas, almost on fortnightly basis, a thorough search of this material produce no evidence that Mirza mentioned his brother’s death at all.

A careful look at tadkirah is enough to reveal to the readers that vast majority of the ilhams for the year 1883, were taken from the letters Mirza wrote to Mir Abbas. These ilhams contain very small, insignificant and minute matters. But during all this period there is no evidence produced in tadkirah whatsoever from this source for the death of Ghulam Qadir.

This proves beyond any shadow of doubt, that Mirza wrote all these prophetic ilhams for the death of his brother, years after the events. This is quite clear from the blunders he has committed to give wide ranging years of his brother’s death.  But surprisingly, he failed to mention this important incident to a follower whom he was writing regularly and frequently during whole of 1883.

Another funny aspect is that the Prophet who supposedly has been selected to convey the message to the Muslims (“true Islam” according to the concoctions by Mirza and the Cult) by Allah SWT, has to ask a Hindu boy to check the accuracy and translate the ilhams, then says he is not satisfied and request his follower to look at them. Even funnier is Mirza’s claim that Allah SWT (nauzobillah) has translated some of the ilhams for him.

We are entitled to ask from Quadianis;

1-     Why not disclose the ilhams in the language Mirza understands in the first place? Was Allah SWT (nauzobillah) try to impress someone here, with English?

2-     Why Allah SWT (nauzobillah) translated only some of the ilhams why not all of them?

3-     Why these ilhams contain errors? god of Mirza was also learning English, at the time of these ilhams?

4-     If so then why his god sends ilhams in English?

5-     What happened to the Islamic concept of All Knowing; All Powerful God?

Mirza raising the dead

Just to add insult to the injury, we produce another master piece from Mirza.

Mirza despite ridiculing Prophet ISA As was very keen to prove that he has been given same miracles like Isa As. We have already covered this in our previous article. We present the evidence on Mirza raising the dead; in this case, as was earlier, it is about his son Mubarak Ahmed. He made various prophecies, claims, explanations and taweels for the earlier claims which obviously proven bogus like usual, further claims to hide the embarrassment. But here we are producing a very clear evidence of his stupidity.

Mirza writes; once I received the revelations “Oh my God please show me how you can raise the dead, and show us Your Mercy and Blessing from the heavens.” In this ilham I received the news that there may be occasions when we have to use this prayer and it would be accepted. Thus it happened once my son Mubarak Ahmed was seriously ill, everyone said he died. I got up and started to move my hand on his head while praying; he started to breath again. This ilham is also fulfilled in another way because Allah SWT has given life to thousands of spiritually dead from our hands.

This way Mirza the incredible wanted to prove that he could raise the dead, as is written in the Holy Quran for Prophet Isa As.

But Mirza made one huge blunder on this prophecy too. In the side columns he has written that this Prophetic ilham was received in 1901 but the fulfillment of this prophecy is listed as 1900. Thus Mirza is trying to say that this Prophecy was fulfilled before it was revealed to Mirza. Bravo Mirza then how this would be foretelling? Before followers of Mirza jump up again, they should consider the title Mirza has given to this incident he writes; “Prophecy 120” the word he used in Urdu is “pashgoai” meaning foretelling of an event, or Prophecy in other words.

Construction of the paragraph makes it impossible for his followers to twist it, as is their habit. The “Sultan of Pen” has written this way most of his life. But we are not complaining. It is making our job easier; he is proving himself a liar, from his own writings.

Conclusions

We have proven once again that Mirza was a liar and he committed fraud to make himself look credible to his followers. He never had any revelations for the death of his brother. He surprisingly and oddly failed to mention a single word either on the ilhams concerning his brother’s death or actual death to his follower. This is impossible if we to consider the dates written on the letters are correct and no other unsavory practice is adopted by the cult on the dates and authenticity of these letters.

There should be absolutely no doubt in anyone’s mind that Mirza wrote these alleged ilhams years after the events, no wonder he couldn’t remember exact dates or years for these momentous incidents in his life. It is very obvious that he tried to claim for his brother’s death the advice he gave to Molvi Abdul Qadir in his letters to Mir Abbass.

We tried our best to locate his letter to Ghulam Qadir, but found no traces of it in various Quadiani sources. We would be glad if someone can produce this evidence, provided its date and contents could be authenticated to belong to 1883 and not after the event forgery by the cult.

The book Nazool-ul-Messih was published after the death of Mirza, therefore, it is proven that his mistakes contained in this book were not corrected by Allah SWT until his death. This together with various other absurdities exposed and his claims which fall by the way side, shows the absurdities of  Mirza’s claims and bold pronouncements that Allah SWT corrects his mistakes and bad memory in blink of an eye. There are no better proofs needed to unmask a liar, in the light of his own writings. Undeniable internal evidence from his writings is the down fall of Mirza.

Fraud and deceptions of the compilers and translator of tadkirah are apparent; they just placed all the ilhams of Ghulam Qadir’s death conveniently in the later part of the 1883 due to their subsequent knowledge for the year and perhaps also the month of Ghulam Qadir’s death.

We have also shown that Mirza never had any divine help in learning languages as he has claimed at various places. In case of English it is quite clear he was obtaining help from whatever sources available to him at any given time, similar zeal was shown to learn Hebrew language.

Mirza after making claims that he would be taught English by Allah SWT after a prayer or two ended up summoning up help even from a Hindu boy to check and translate his alleged English ilhams, which without a shadow of a doubt he has written by using the unique ways he so clearly was eager to learn for both English and Hebrew languages.

Mirza has made his god yalesh butt of all jokes, by writing such hilarious English ilhams.

All rights reserved © 2009