BY Ali Khan

The decision of Supreme Court of Pakistan on NRO issue may have shocked or surprised some, but to some of us who have followed the behaviour of Supreme Court of Pakistan in recent years, there were no thunderclap at all.

Some of us weren’t surprised but were expecting this swivet from thePremier Court in Pakistan. I prognosticated it many times in my emails sent to the attention of Chief Justice of Pakistan.

Pakistani Gordon knots are obvious for any independent minded person, whose loyalties are not attached to any particular political party, focus group or any other type pressure group or groupings. Or those who are not under the dictate of any foreign powers, as usually claimed in Pakistani media.

The veracity of the matter is the “Doctrine of necessity” never left the shores of Pakistan, even though it had been venturously advertised many times by the Supreme Court of Pakistan that the dark old ages when this doctrine was used are behind us all.

The issue of notice to Babar Awan by Supreme Court of Pakistan a week ago is case in point. The synthetic doctor had cross the Rubicon a while back, but Supreme Court in its time tested traditions of see no evil, hear no evil kept ignoring his verbiage for years, before finally coming to the realisation that any more delay and foot-dragging would destroy its own credibility beyond repairs.

The factitious Doctor on the other hand took it as “Card Blanche” and kept his tirade going without any arriere-pensee or fear of reprisals. He must have thought Pakistani nation including the Judiciary has accepted and tolerated his daring attacks on the institution of Judiciary as they have assented his fake doctorate, prefabricated from a diploma mill for a pittance.

But there is no doubt whatever were his intentions or if he considers it his sleight, Babar Awan have caused untold contusion to the reputation of PPP inside and outside of Pakistan, with overseas Pakistanis and with those in the foreign media who take interest in Pakistani politics and off course in diplomatic circles.

The case of Babar Awan is the microcosms of the problems faced by Pakistan.

The proclivity of accepting abstruse people with questionable morals and characters in Politics is rancid in Pakistan. Pakistanis acquiesce people either on the basis of their social standings in the society or on the basis of their affiliations with the political parties but never on the basis of morals and characters. Such callousness has brought Pakistan disaster after disaster in domestic as well as international arenas but alas no lessons have been learned.

There is no better example than the fate of a German Defence Minister, to see the difference between the behaviours in Pakistan and how in comparison civilised countries behave.

Ex-Defence Minister of Germany Karl-Theodor Zu Guttenberg was accused of plagiarism in his doctoral thesis.  Guttenberg first admitted “serious mistakes” in his 2006 dissertation but denied cheating. He also offered that he would forgo use of the title “Doctor” to ward off the criticism.

But despite his efforts the furore continued, Bayreuth University then conducted an enquiry and the committee formed by the university found Guttenberg had “grossly violated standard research practices and in so doing deliberately deceived”. The committee concluded “it was obvious that plagiarism was involved”.

Zu Guttenberg resigned before the publications of committee’s findings. He was a rising star in his party Christian Social Union (CSU) and was tipped to go right at the top in the party cadres.

When we compare this incident with Babar Awan’s example we see vast dissimilitude behaviour not only by Awan but his cohorts in PPP and by Pakistani Society at large.

Even though Awan’s doctorate, “a piece of worthless paper” to be more precise was obtained after payment of few hundred dollars to a diploma mill, meagre amount compare to what finances would be required to obtain a doctorate from a reputable University in the West.

But Awan never showed any remorse towards this thimblerig he aimed at Pakistani Nation. On the contrary as expected he showed tenacity in proving his doctorate is bona fide. Only consolation he could claim is that his doctorate was genuinely issued by a bogus university. What can be said, but that Awan think he is a polyhistor at fauxing others. We witnessed him demonstrating it regularly to Pakistani nation. He had been burlesquing his opponents for years, now he is mocking the Judges of the Supreme Court of Pakistan too.

Instead of resigning like the German Minister or him completely removed from the public scenes by his party PPP, Awan continued to defy the common sense, logic and decent behaviour.

Zu Guttenberg’s degree was genuine earned after writing a dissertation, albeit a plagiarised one, but nevertheless a dissertation.  Awan’s degree is obtained from a fake university for fistful of dollars and his dissertation no where to be found. But incredulous Pakistani insists to be a genuinely qualified and blameless in the whole saga. His intentions and insistence to be treated as a genuine holder of a doctorate are quite clear from his use of Doctor with his name.

There is another famous ersatz doctor in Pakistani public life; this one pretends to be an Islamic Scholar. The most disturbing part of this imitative’s story is that he in the past has worked for the biggest news organisation in Pakistan before moving to one of their rivals. Even more preposterous and disturbing part is the use of the title “Doctor” with his name in the credits of the programs he presents on the TV despite the fact that his degrees are fake is a public knowledge. His con tricks are not limited to the Doctorate.

The Management of his current employers were requested through a message on their website that use of Doctor with his name in program credits is an insult to Pakistani nation and it is highly questionable on moral grounds, if we leave the legal grounds of such proclamations on one side. Despite full knowledge by his employers both past and present that this man is holding fake degrees including doctorate, the practices to present him as a doctor and an Islamic Scholar have not ceased.

The sole reason for specific mention of these two individuals in public life is to prove that the standards have slipped so much in our public life that we are not only tolerating the mountebank and cozener but are glorifying them.

Recently Babar Awan was issued notice by Supreme Court of Pakistan whether his membership of SC Bar Association should be suspended or cancelled due to his persisting disregard for the sanctity of the highest court in the Land. But why surprisingly the Bar didn’t move far earlier when the facts about Awan’s fake doctorate were publicised? Why he was not ordered to stop using the title of the “Doctor” with his name, otherwise his membership of the Supreme Court Bar Association would be cancelled?

Instead of Babar made to resign from his post of Law Minister and sidelined by his party earlier, he recently resigned from his position on the orders of SC to represent PPP before the supreme court in a case of mammoth importance. But it could be said, it is not hard to understand behind the scenes he probably even now retained control of the Law Ministry.

The moral of the story is when such characters are given importance and are glorified in public life then Pakistanis should expect the downfall of the society and nation as a whole. This foozle in standards in public life is visible in Pakistan, where corruption and disrespect of the Law and state institutions is visible to a besotted person. But alas, Pakistani nation is still not learning from its flubs and making amends.

If what one Journalist has reported is correct after a recent meeting in the President House, it is decided that the Government to engage in a tug-of-war with Supreme Court and not to goose-step with its order to write the letter to the Swiss authorities, then the troubles are just starting for Pakistan. If this news is correct then surely the end of PPP Government is neigh. Or else Supreme Court would loose its pridefulness and authority over the nation. In any civilised society there cannot be different rules and laws for different people.

Any attempts to treat the privileged differently from the masses always create an exclusive society where breakdown in Law and Order is a given certainty. Pakistanis suffering for decades from the contagium to give sui generis treatment to the privileged.

Supreme Court of Pakistan in the past is equally beholden for maintenance of status quo and guilty of treating the privileged above the law. We don’t have to look far in the past, only very recently we had Justice Dogar heading Supreme Court of Pakistan.

What saddens educated Pakistanis is that Supreme Court of Pakistan is still using “Doctrine of necessity” despite denying it. I sensed it few months ago and wrote an email for the attention of Chief Justice, where I gave example of a small town magistrate in the UK who would send the misfeasor, purloins contrabands to the jail if they are proven guilty. I compare the decisions of magistrate to the decisions of Supreme Court of Pakistan where those who have misappropriated billions in Rental Power Plants fiasco are going Scott-free as long as they return the loot back. Even a Minister conveniently made an excuse of not knowing how millions of rupees dropped in his bank accounts without his notice. To no one surprise he got away with it by returning the money. Where as in the UK a small town Magistrate would have sent each and every larcenist to the Jail or order community service no matter if even a small amount was stolen.

This is such a travesty of justice that it may not be matched by any civilised nation on the face of the earth. Seeing such lax attitude of the Judiciary in Pakistan, world criminals have started to demand the same treatment, if we get caught we return the loot back and viola our misdemeanours are forgotten. Imagine if such laws persist in the world, the criminals would have a field day. This is precisely what is happening in Pakistan, criminals are having a field day. One has to look at the news in Pakistan, everyday filled with violence, death and destruction. If world started to call Pakistan a banana republic then we shouldn’t be surprised or caterwaul. It saddened me to no ends but truth must be told, as Iqbal said “Mujhe hai hukam-e-Azan”.

There is no doubt, Monday should be the end of Supreme Court tether and they will hit the culprits with the full force of the Law.

There is call for sanity to prevail and compromise to reach. This could be yet another big mistake Supreme Court would make to keep the old tradition of “doctrine of necessity” alive and kicking.

All those who are raising such voices are not really friends ofPakistanthey are actually the real enemies. The voices of status quo, who wants the current contrivance to continue. What their demand is to continue exculpate the acts of the guilty and keep pretending nothing happened and compromise for the sake of the country. This is not actually a compromise for the sake of the country but an open animosity and treason against the country. It would only delay the inevitable.

When magma simmers under the surface it is bound to erupt sooner or later. We would be in similar situation again, a cast iron guarantee, probably more quickly than many realise. When people like Babar Awan started to feel they are heroes, a nation should start getting worried, seriously.

The judges could bring the country back from the percept and hand over sever punishments to those who have refused to implement its decision starting from the Prime Minister and the President. Especially the Prime Minister Gilani has to be made an example for his failure to implement Supreme Court’s orders for over two years. For Pakistan it is now or never, any dithering by the premier court in the land would only be delaying the inevitable, wisdom tell us.

All rights reserved © 2012

I just read your recent article in the “Daily Jang” titled as “Khan Sahab and Puppet President”. I am surprised to see that despite plenty happenings in Pakistan at the moment, you found it important to raise a trivial and irrelevant issue 14 years too late.

What pre-eminence this topic holds in current climate when Pakistanis facing dire consequences from the failures of the Politicians in the country. Perhaps it never crossed your mind that the democratic government in Pakistanis on its last leg after dodging implementation of Supreme Court of Pakistan decisions for almost three years.

And perhaps it is also of no consequences for you that your beloved Nawaz Sharif and PMLN despite demanding immediate elections are reluctant to resign from both Punjab and National Assemblies to push PPP government for fresh elections.

We know the reason why PMLN is reluctant, elections means Imran Khan wiping the floor with overwhelming success in the elections under an independent election commission and if new electoral rolls are used, based on the National Identity Cards’ computer database. Nawaz Sharif and his “Hawaris” know fully well, their popularity is at a nose dive with PPP fearing the same outcome, therefore despite their demands for fresh elections; PMLN still colluding with PPP and behind the scene it is still playing the role of “friendly opposition”.

Then again, how would you justify your friendship with the Sharifs, if you don’t write such irrelevant balderdash?

By the way, why are you objecting to the obiter dictum relayed by Imran Khan when you confirmed yourself that President Tarrar refused to write the letter requested by the Argentina’s President or the Company he was heading? As much as Imran Khan was concerned his prime motives at that time were to halcyonically set up “ShaukatKhanumCancerHospital”. In that regard as much as he was concerned any help would have been appreciated. For Imran to show disconsolateness or even estrangement is quite cut-and-dried and entirely acceptable behaviour in the tracts of even-keeled people.

On another note, recently I have written an article on the finances of Sharifs. I have forwarded the short cut to the article to PMLN officials including Ahsan Iqbal in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary General of PMLN and also to Shahbaz Sharif. Unfortunately Nawaz Sharif still lives in dinosaur’s era I couldn’t find his email address or any other way of communication with him. I hope you would oblige me and pass this short cut to Nawaz Sharif.

Until now no one from PMLN or Sharif family have responded to it, even though assets and incomes of Sharifs’ family had been their favourite topic in recent TV programs. I think dealing with facts and proofs is beyond their dexterities, they are only good to assiduously hoodwink and gyp Pakistani people.

I hope a grandee of Pakistan Press like you love to respond, especially when you had been a well wisher and shill of Sharifs’ for decades.

http://crankthatskunk.wordpress.com/2011/12/25/pmln-shenanigans-on-assets-issue/

Recently different leaders of PMLN have constantly explained, argued and challenged the people of Pakistan and Overseas Pakistanis to present the evidence of corruption of Sharif’s family and the nature and extent of their assets in Pakistan and overseas.

Also the issue of the income of Nawaz and Shahbaz Sharif and their tax liabilities has been repeatedly discussed at breadth length by different leaders of PMLN.

For time being leave the nitty gritty of the declared assets of Nawaz Sharif, this issue could be set aside, for the sake of clarifying the issues first and foremost. It is difficult to understand the logic, reasoning and explanations of PMLN leaders about the tax liabilities of Nawaz Sharif. Most of the time, they are either very confused, do not have enough details available, or are evasive at best, if not purposefully dishonest in their answers and explanations. We all have the interest to find the truth, and in pursuing avenues to find the truth. The truth has to be told to the Pakistani nation, not necessarily for the sake of Imran Khan or his party PTI. The integrity of PMLN leaders is a problem for the whole nation, not limited to certain individuals or political parties.

It is rather disturbing the mixing of the issues and the poor grasp of Accounting and Taxation issues. It is also quite apparent after watching the TV talk shows that the leaders of PMLN are either blissfully unaware at best and/or deliberately misleading the nation at its worst on the difference between an individual, a business and a Company.

LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES AND ENTITITES

In accounting, the application of GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principle) implemented through SORP’s and through Taxation Laws by Governments, a Business is treated separate from its owners; similarly a Corporation is a separate legal entity according to the definitions of Company Law.

A person pays Income Tax, while a Business also incurred Business taxes and Company incurred Corporation Tax liabilities for the profit it earns. In any event the Business and Company cannot be considered as individuals or the tax paid by either the business or the Corporation can be treated as the tax paid by the individuals.

It is necessary to record the business’s transactions separately, to distinguish them from the owner’s personal transactions.

The idea is that the financial transactions of one individual or a group of individuals must be kept separate from any unrelated financial transactions of a business or a Company.

For example a sole trader in a one man business takes money from his business by way of ‘drawings’; money for his own personal use. Despite it being his business and apparently his money, there are still two aspects to the transaction: the business is ‘giving’ money and the individual is ‘receiving’ money. Even though there is no other legal distinction between the sole trader and the business, and the sole trader is liable for all of the debts of the business, business transactions will still be taxed separately from personal transactions

For these reasons, the affairs of the individuals behind a business should be kept separate from the affairs of the business itself.

For Companies the restrictions are laid down in the Company’ Law, for legal reasons company is a separate legal entity, with the Directors having limited liabilities, unless the liabilities are covered with personal assurances or guarantees.

A Company and its affairs are separate from its Directors or shareholders. A company can be:

Different from its member, directors, – Limited Liability- Sue or be sued- Own assets- Enter Contracts- Commit crimes (pollute), similarly it would incurred separate Tax liabilities from its directors and members.

TAXATION

Mostly the British Laws and specifications are used, but Pakistan follows similar guidelines and rules. Where ever it is applicable Pakistani taxation laws are also outlined.

INCOME TAX

Income tax is tax on the income of the individuals, and payable by the individuals.

It consists of Income obtained from;

-          Earnings from employment

-          Earnings from self-employment i.e. if you have a business

-          Pension Income

-          Interests on Savings and other accounts, unless exempted.

-          Income from shares, dividends etc.

-          Rental Income from properties and other chalets.

-          Income from a trust

The individuals are liable to Income tax on a variety of Income, and should pay taxes on them and on whatever benefits they draw from different sources.

Pakistani taxation laws also mention same sources in total and taxable income of an individual.

Pakistani Taxation Law also specified that for resident income from both Pakistani and foreign sources is taxable. While for non-resident individual it is restricted to income from Pakistani sources only. This clarification is important to counter the claims by some PMLN leaders that NS didn’t pay any taxes before 2008 because he was not residing inPakistan.

TAX ON COMPANY’S BENEFITS

Not only are individuals liable to pay taxes on the Income they draw from their business or employment, or Director’s remuneration, but they are also responsible to pay taxes on any benefits in kind they draw.

-          Company cars or vans

-          Fuel provided for the vehicles

-          Medical insurance

-          Living accommodation

-          Loans at low interest rates

Pakistani taxation laws also list Loan, advances, deposits or gift received from another person or company as taxable amounts. It also listed self-hiring, or receiving rent-free accommodation or housing as taxable Income. In Pakistan the tax payers are also obliged to file Wealth statements, for self, their spouses, minor children and dependent.

Pakistan taxation Laws are no different from the UK, benefits in kind are known as Perquisite in Pakistani Tax Laws. It lists private use of vehicles, services of a housekeeper, driver, gardener or any other domestic help. Payment of utilities bills, Loans given on less than the benchmark rates, any amount forgone/paid by the employer due on the employee either from the employer or any other person or institution, transfer of any property or provision of services by the employer to an employee, accommodation or housing provided by the employer to the employees.

CAPITAL GAIN TAX

Capital Gain Tax is payable on certain transactions of property disposal, business disposal, assets disposals etc.

Even Gifting your property or business to someone is actually taxable, unless the person is your spouse (or civil partner in British Law). Gifting your assets to your children is liable for Capital Gain Tax and/or Inheritance tax if the assets are transferred to children in case of person’s death.

When you make a gift to a family member connecting to you, other than your spouse, you still need to work out and pay the tax liability on it. It still applies if you dispose of the assets in any other way to them, for example, you sell it to them for a low price. A connected person in this context is someone such as your brother, sister, child, parent, grandparent, mother-in-law or business partner. The assets must be valued at the market price at the time the gift is made and gain or loss on disposal is calculated.

INHERITANCE TAX

In the event of someone death the person who inherited the assets/properties is liable to Inheritance Tax on anything over the threshold limits. There are different thresholds for spouses and other people who inherit assets including children. On taxable portion of the inheritance tax is payable at 40%.

COPORATION TAX AND OTHER TAXES INCLUDING DUTIES, VAT OR SALES TAX

Businesses on the other hand pay different taxes on their activities, if incorporated then CT liabilities are payable.

No matter if the business is incorporated or not, the persons are different from the business and any benefits they draw from their business they are still liable for Income tax on those benefits.

The taxes paid on material, goods or services by a business or a company are separate from an individual. VAT or Sales tax, is collected on behalf of the state tax authorities, and should not be treated as Income Tax or other Taxes paid by the business or individuals. Similarly Excise Duties and Custom Duties paid form the cost of the goods and production and cannot be treated as taxes paid by the businesses. These costs are passed on to the customers/consumers. In the end, all such costs are paid by the end consumers and not by the business. Any inclusion of these duties as taxes paid is improper and shows intellectual dishonesty and purposeful deception.

THE ISSUES

Many PMLN leaders are deliberating misleading Pakistani public by mentioning and claiming that the businesses owned by Sharif family paid billions in taxes. These exaggerated amounts more likely than not are the duties and sales tax collected on behalf of the state. The businesses are just safe keepers of these duties and other taxes, either levied as Sales Tax or VAT on goods and services, or duties paid, which in the final analysis are paid by the end users of the goods and services.

It saddened and enrages some of us when we see such deliberate misrepresentation by political leaders. PMLN leadership should specify how much out of those supposed billions were Sales Tax collected or other duties on Raw Material etc.

For example a business can show a loss on its business activities and hence pay no Income tax on business activities, but still would pay billions in VAT, Sales Tax and other duties collected on behalf of state during the financial year by the business.

People of Pakistan need to know how much profit is declared by various businesses of Sharif family over the years. PMLN need to provide break down of the alleged billions paid by Sharif family in taxes. How much were Personal Taxes, Taxes paid on business activities, Corporation Tax and how much of the amounts were for sales tax and other duties collected on behalf of the state and were not actually the taxes paid by Sharif family.

Even though it sounds like a far fetched idea, but there are some people in PMLN, who should know how the tax laws work in the world. When PMLN leaders present these misleading figures in political discussion programs and start to mix different tax liabilities, they are not only doing a disservice to their own party, but are also insulting the intelligence of decent, educated Pakistanis and Overseas Pakistanis.

We have seen more than one classically deceptive presentation by different leaders of PMLN. Various PMLN leaders constantly repeat same misleading lines prove that these deceptions are not only pre planned but are party line towed by its’ leaders. Many leaders of PMLN regularly jump on the bandwagon. Namely Khawaja Asif, Ahsan Iqbal, Sadiq al Farooq, Mushahidullah Khan, Hanif Abbasi Etc and now more frequently some members of Sharif Family.

Main arguments presented by PMLN leaders

First snap shots of usual comments made by various leaders of PMLN from time to time on TV talk shows. A further analysis of contradictions in their statements is provided later in this article.

1- Every MNA and MPA is duty bound to declare their assets. Sharif family members including Nawaz Sharif has declared their assets with their nomination papers.

2-  Nawaz Sharif back in 90’s transferred all his assets to his sons and therefore, does not own any substantial properties, businesses and bank accounts in his name.

3-  NS doesn’t have any substantial Income that’s why NS is indebted to his wife and sons.

4-  It has been said by PMLN leaders, in last two years and on another occasion it has been said in last 6 months NS or his sons have transferred 65 Crores to Pakistan.

5-   All the properties owned by Hassan Nawaz in theUKwere bought on mortgage; this fact can be confirmed from the accounts of the companies owned by Hassan Nawaz in the UK.

6-   At that time of the Purchase of these properties in the UK by Sharif family, the properties could be bought with 5% down payment and the remaining 95% financed by the banks.

7-  In one program Mr. Khawaja Asif said Hassan owned properties from mid 90’s. But later in the same program he confessed some of the properties were bought 4/5 years before Hassan migrated toUK. So who owned those properties before Hassan’s migration? Mr. Asif wouldn’t give a clear and unambiguous answer.

8-  In a recent program Mr. Sadiq Al-Farooq said NS was a billionaire decades ago.

These points give snap shots and the flavour of the statements made by various leaders of PMLN. But unfortunately their explanations and comments raise more questions than answer them.

Document on PMLN’s web site declarations of taxes paid

PMLN recently has published brief details of their assets, in response to the allegations that Nawaz Sharif has paid Rs5, 000 in income tax. If we ignore tall claims on family wealth and generalise boosting (this would become obvious from the state of financial affairs of the whole family from declared assets for a particular year) we can gleaned following details.

1-  Itefaq Foundary between 1972/73 to 1978/79 allegedly paid just over Rs 100 million in taxes consist of Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Electricity and Gas bills and other Miscellaneous Taxes. But surprise surprise no mention of Income Tax paid by the family members or the Corporation or Business taxes paid by the business.

2- Between 1978/79 to 1985/86 a tax figure of 893 million is shown listing Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Electricity and Gas bills and Misc. Taxes; but once again no mention of Income Tax paid by the family members or Business taxes. It seems Sharif family consider paying back Sales Tax collected on behalf of the state, or Custom and Excise duties paid on raw material which forms cost of production, or even utilities bills as their personal tax liabilities.

In Accounting Practices SSAP 9 requires that stock is valued in the balance sheets at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost includes all directly attributable costs incurred in bringing stock to its present location and condition i.e.

• Raw materials
• Delivery – including import duties, excise duties, transport and handling costs
• Manufacturing – including production overheads (i.e. Electricity and gas usage) Net realisable value (NRV) is the expected proceeds of sale net of all expected costs of sale.

Therefore, for PMLN leaders to include duties and other production costs such as gas and electricity in the amount of taxes paid is little bit naughty to say the least.

3-  For Ramzan Sugar Mills Ltd, for the period covering 1992 to 2009, a figure of 3 billion 15 crores is mentioned, once again it includes Sales Tax, Excise Duty, but surprisingly income tax is mentioned this time, but no break down is provided.

4-  Chaudry Sugar Mills; 1993 to 2010 alleged tax paid is Rs 3 billion 11 crores, once again Excise duty, Sales Tax and Income Tax is mentioned but no figures for income or corporation taxes are given.

5-  Mehran Ramzan Textiles Mills Ltd, 1993 to 2006 16 Crores and 67 Lacs is mentioned for Sales Tax, Excise Duty and Income Tax, but to no one’s surprise no figures of Income tax is mentioned.

6- Hamza Board Mills Limited; 1993 to 2006 a sum of 16 crores 30 lacs paid, but no details, no mention of how much income tax is paid.

7- Hudiba Engineering Company (Private) Ltd, 1994 to 2010 paid 9 crores 18 lacs in Sales Tax, Excise Tax and Income Tax, but no break up of Income Tax paid by the members of Sharif Family.

Analysis of PMLN Propaganda on Official website

It should n’t surprise anyone, even such bold document full of self praising, does n’t have any credible evidence on the Income taxes paid by Sharif family members for over 2 decades. Something which Pakistani nation wants to know how such lavish life styles have been maintained by them without showing any substantial personal Incomes and taxes paid on those incomes. A family which includes sales taxes, duties and utilities bills in the total taxes paid. It should necessitate that independent analysts pay no credence to these declarations. Why then some of Pakistani media give prominence to PMLN claims without asking relevant questions or demanding complete breakdown to assess how much Income taxes actually are paid by the individuals in the family? Unfortunately Journalism in Pakistan leaves lot to be desired.

An analysis of these claims is necessary to show some startling facts from these proud declarations.

1- For a period of 6 years, from 1972 to 1979, total of 100 millions were paid which included duties and electric and gas bills. This means on average the whole of Sharif family paid out Rs100 million as out goings for their businesses, none of them could be classed or treated as Income or Corporation Taxes. This comes to an average of 16 million per annum for 6 years covered. Or in other words, they pad 1.6 crores in business expenses and cost of production. The duties are paid on the Raw Materials imported and it is a common practice in accountancy as demonstrated earlier to include these duties and energy bills used in direct production to form the cost of the production of goods. The question remains how whole of the Sharif family survived during these 6 years? How much were their personal Incomes? How the stories of Sharif family being in the business since 1930’s and were amongst the top industrialists reconciles with these figures? Why Sharif’s cannot explain a simple fact which any competent accountant or tax man should ask?

2-     For 8 years period between 1979 and 1986, 894 millions were paid out in total. It is quite obvious that the activities in the foundry increased around 6 times or 600% increase in the total amount paid compare to previous 6 years. It seems Foundary all of a sudden expended. But how? How it is possible that from 16 million average the costs of production has gone over to almost 112 million a year on average? From where the money came from? Cost of production also means that the production facilities were increased, which generally indicate capital expenditure on production facilities. How it was financed and in which years expansion took place? Any Bank loans were obtained for the expansion of the factory and its production facilities? Once again no figures or explanations how much out of 894 million were Income Taxes paid by the family?

3-  Another important point to make here is that during this period no other businesses of Sharif family are mentioned in this document by PMLN. So whatever income Taxes were paid by the family in these 14 years was derived from Itefaq foundry; it was the sole source of Income of the whole family.

Why there is reluctance to show for each and every year the figures for Income tax of family members and Business taxes or Corporation Tax by the Company if it was incorporated? Younger son of Mr. Shahabaz Sharif on Geo boasted  how wealthy and prominent was Sharif Family and how much they paid out in taxes over the years. He was given majority of the air time by the presenter, but he failed to give any specific details or proofs. The mantra was the same, we were the biggest business family since 1930’s and if political vendetta was not used against us we would have been rubbing shoulders with likes of TATA’s of India.

Simple advice to the Sharifs, figures don’t lie. You cannot fool educated people with such “Baraks” and obtaining air time from your hand picked presenters. We can easily understand the realities of certain personalities in Pakistani media.

4-  Another clever tactics used in this self praising document is that no details    of family business are given before 1972 when the business was nationalised. Why can’t they produce how much were they worth in 1972 at the time of nationalisation? These should be readily available figures to produce, unless they know the reality of family’s wealth would become clearer if they produce the total worth of the businesses nationalised.

Claims on Historical wealth of Sharifs’ and the reality

A-  It is declared repeatedly NS was a billionaire two decades ago, In 90’s he transferred his billions to his children, mostly to his two sons. According to PMLN leaders Hassan has bought all the properties in theUKwith 5% down payments. Similarly Hussain owned businesses in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are financed by the banks.

B-     How does these two supposed facts reconcile with each other?

C-    If Properties they now own are mostly financed by the banks and are mortgaged to the banks, then where are the supposed billions NS had and transferred to his children?

D-    It is well over due for PMLN leadership to justify their comments to the public and explain in clear and acceptable terms, which one of the two positions is correct? They cannot cut it both ways, if NS had billions and he transferred it to his children, there could be only two possibilities. Either those billions were invested by his children in assets bought and in the acquisition of businesses or they are deposited in to the banks. It should be piece of cake for Sharif Family to prove either possibility or mix of them with solid documentary proofs. They cannot maintain both positions. If the properties are purchased from the loans/mortgages provided by the banks, then the billions supposedly transferred by Nawaz Sharif must be stacked somewhere. Where are they? They have another choice, they can show that the overseas properties owned by different family members, mainly in the UK and Saudi Arabia were actually bought from the billions allegedly transferred by Nawaz Sharif to his children. In such eventuality we need to have proofs how those billions were transferred to the UK and Saudi Arabia? Either way deceptions or purposeful evasions are not the answers, the issues are quite clear, educated people would n’t buy such distorted answers from the leadership of PMLN.

E-  Even though PMLN has shied away from providing the details of Income tax paid by the family during past decades. But a glimpse of reality can be seen from example of one such year of family’s businesses, which is hailed as era of increase in the financial fortunes of family’s wealth. According to tax statements at 30^th June 1998, total Income Tax paid by 11 members of Sharif Family was just 0.25 million. They paid 0.55 million as wealth tax and a further 0.13 million as agricultural tax. The businesses mostly showed losses and the majority of income tax were paid on Director’s salaries or the dividends paid from Chaudhry Sugar Mills. This total tax including wealth and agricultural tax of 0.94 million was a mere 0.01% of total declared wealth of 676.8 million. According to the documentary evidence Nawaz Sharif has declared his Income Tax liability as “NIL”. His total net wealth was 2.1 million and in total he had admissible debts of 6.4 million. NS wife Kulsoom Nawaz also showed her tax liability as “NIL” but paid Rs8, 000 taxes on dividends received from Chaudry Sugar Mills. She had net wealth of just 32K after adjustment of 3.95 million allowable debts, leaving her with a wealth tax bill of Rs.178.

F-  On the same date Shahbaz Sharif filed “NIL” Income Tax liability, having a negative Net Wealth of 4.5 million. He paid Rs 1000 as tax on dividends received from Chaudhry Sugar Mills.

G-    Mian Sharif paid Rs50, 102 as Income Tax and paid a further 1.96 million in wealth tax. Mrs. Sharif paid Income tax of 60K and Rs131 as Agricultural Tax. (Source Jang Group October 17, 1999).

H-  The year 1998 falls in the same periods shown by the propaganda document released by PMLN shows that Ramzan and Chaudry Sugar Mills each paid in excess of Rs 3 billions over 17 years.  1998 provides us a very good indication that Sharif family had not paid any substantial taxes which can demonstrate that their life styles were maintained from these taxes. No wonder PMLN document does not provides the details of income tax paid by family members. Similarly PMLN leaders in TV talk shows always talk vaguely and always include Sales taxes, duties and utility bills in the alleged total taxes paid.

I-   It seems that nothing has changed ever since, according to their spokesmen Mr. Nawaz Sharif has paid total Rs 2.5 million in taxes for 2010/2011 and in the previous year 2009/2010 he paid Rs 2 million in taxes. Once again the source was Chaudhry Sugar Mills. No breakdown of the taxes provided to show how much was Income Tax paid. The amounts of taxes paid in last two years has increased substantially compared to previous years due to the pressure applied by Imran Khan and PTI.

Historical perspective on Sharif’s wealth

One major claim by Sharif family is based on their wealth since 1930 and also that they received a massive financial hit from nationalisation by Bhutto in 1972.

1-     1970 list

Surprisingly the list of wealthiest families in Pakistanin 1970 does not mention Sharif family at all. It contains 42 prominent groups and families; it has Dawoods’ at number 1 with total assets worth Rs.557.8 million and Farooqs’ at number 42 with total assets worth 36.7 million. (Source: Industrial Concentration and economic power in Pakistan by Lawrence White).

Whatever their claims may be the evidence is stacked against these claims; just before the privatisation in 1972 Sharifs were not the major power in Pakistan.

Recent claims by a younger Sharif to be TATA’s ofPakistanbefore nationalisation cannot be taken seriously by any objective analyst. It is an established fact that Sharifs’ could be termed as small entrepreneurs before 1970, but nothing comparable to what it is claimed by the family, claim of rubbing shoulders with TATAS’. The evidence suggests they didn’t loose out massively in privatisation as they claim. One thing is squarely against Sharif Family, if they had the proofs of their family wealth and evidence on the valuation of their businesses nationalised they would have proudly produced it to convince their doubters.

2- 1990 List

A list published in Herald of June 1990 had Ittefaq group at number 25 with net worth of Rs.398 million. The list was headed by Habibs’ with a net worth of Rs.5781 million.

The historical evidence proves that Sharif family actually started to get rich after Nawaz Sharif started his political career thanks the patronage of General Zia-ul-Haq, a dictator it must be added.

3- 1997 List

Something very drastic happened in Pakistan during the period between 1990 and 1997. The wealth of richest families of Pakistan dramatically increased many folds during this period. Ittefaq group jumped to number 5 positions with manufacturing assets worth Rs.10000 million. The rich list was headed by Nishat group with total Assets worth Rs.192937 million.

The massive upsurge in the fortunes of Pakistani Industrialists was direct result of privatisation by Nawaz Sharif and Benazir Bhutto, when national assets worth billions were sold out to the industrial groups of Pakistan. There was a paradigm shift in the balance of power between the industrialists from Karachi, represented by the Memons towards the industrialists from Punjab represented by Chinnots and off course Lahore groups.

The historical Evidence shows that Sharifs’ claims to be wealthy from 1930 cannot be sustained. Their wealth started to increase between mid 80s’ to 2000, and coincided with the period when Nawaz Sharif served first in Punjab and then on National stage as Prime Minister.

Overseas Properties/Assets/Bank Balances

The fact is the statements made by PMLN leaders are not conclusive or satisfactory. Financial matters cannot be cleared from vague or open ended comments, it demands proofs; these comments raise more questions; these questions have to be answered by PMLN leadership.

In the words and statements of various PMLN leaders the acquisition of overseas properties of Sharif family can be summarised as follows.

A- NS had billions; he transferred those billions to his sons, who settled overseas and are running successful businesses.

B-  How these billions were transferred overseas? No evidence ever provided.

C-  According to the comments by some PMLN leaders the overseas properties and businesses by Nawaz Sharifs’ sons were bought from the money borrowed from the banks. Simple logic tells us that if the properties were bought on 95% financing by the Banks, those supposed billions were not spent on the acquisition of assets and properties. In that case we are entitled to ask where are those billions now?

D- Were these billions invested in properties on the names of different members of NS family including his wife and daughter besides his sons or even some outside his family? These properties not included in the list of properties owned by the companies of Hassan in the UK? Are these properties declared as assets by Nawaz Sharif or his family anywhere in the record submitted or presented?

E-  The companies run by Hassan in theUKearned profit? How much profit they earned, how much CT they paid given they all are limited companies, with nominal Share Capitals on their BS.

F-  What was the Director’s remuneration drawn by Hassan or any other member of NS family from these companies? What Income Tax paid on those remunerations? How many other benefits in kind drawn from those companies by Hassan or NS family? And how much tax paid on those benefits?

G-  It has been said 65 Crores are transferred to Pakistanrecently by Sharif Family. How much of it was from theUKand how much was it from Saudia? Any documentary evidence of transfers of money?

H-  Were these amounts from the disposal/sales of assets/properties held in the companies’ names? If they were, CGT paid on the disposals?

I-  If this amount was drawn from the profits made by the companies, how much CT paid on those profits? Were these profits drawn by the Directors? How these profits were drawn? Were relevant taxes paid on such withdrawals? Or tax on dividends if the amounts were drawn as such.

Sharifs’ Companies Accounts from the UK

PMLN leadership regularly taunt their opponents and doubters that in the UK option is available for people to obtain the accounts of the companies owned by the son(s) of Nawaz Sharif. One shouldn’t shy away from a challenge therefore it was paramount to go through the troubles of obtaining the financial accounts of the companies owned by Sharif family in the UK. Sharif family has to bear the blame that instead of being straight forward with Pakistani people and present the full details of their assets and incomes as honesty demanded, they are trying to shift onus on the public to obtain the information. It sounds like it is public’s fault that Sharifs’ are suspected to have obtained their wealth by suspicious and inappropriate means. May be Sharifs’ and PMLN leaders know the reasons to insist on general public obtaining the accounts of the UK Companies owned by the family; people would n’t be able to get any relevant and useful information from the submitted companies account in the UK. In the UK small companies are entitled for limited disclosure through their accounts. The accounts submitted to the Companies House by Sharif family only accompanied by a Shortened Balance Sheets.  These Balance Sheets do not give any indications on either the Director’s remuneration, dividends received by the directors or any other benefits drawn from the companies. It does not provide any indications of companies’ profitability either and how much CT or any other taxes paid by different companies.

1-  Quint Paddington Limited: Mr H N Sharif appointed Director on 2/3/2007.

The company shows a net worth of £1, 367,626 in 2010, increased over two financial years from £69,995 in 2008. As the additions of almost 1.2 million is in the last two years, therefore, the historical valuation would n’t be much different from the current market valuation. If anything it would be worth less due to the downturn in the property market in recent years.

There is something very interesting in the accounts submitted by the company, for the clarification of the issues full accounts needed to be studied. Total current assets of the company are eliminated completely in last two years. In 2008 the Current Assets were shown at £3,238,681 and in 2009 the have gone down to £2,744,189, which means that assets worth £494,492 were disposed in 2009. The figure shown in 2010 accounts for Current Asset is 0. It means that in 2010 remaining £2,744,189 assets were disposed off or transferred to another company.

Keeping in line the stock held has decreased in these two years, it was £3,038,222 n 2008 and has gone down to £0 in 2010. But strangely the current liabilities have also increased during these three years from £562,270 in 2008 to £752,626. This is rather odd occurrence, given that this company is dealing with investment properties, the stock should have increase as well if the current liabilities represented the loans or mortgages obtained for the purchase of properties for stock as per PMLN claims. It indicates that the current liabilities in 2010 accounts represent some other source. No explanations are available in shortened and limited disclosure in the accounts submitted; therefore, nothing could be ascertained with certainty without explanations.

For all three years the accounts showed £0 as cash at Banks. It means that this company had no cash inflows and probably no cash transactions. It main operation was just the properties stock, which were disposed off during last two years or transferred to another company.

2-  Flagship Securities Limited: Mr. H N Sharif appointed Director on 25/7/2005.

The company shows cash at bank £61,193 in 2010 accounts, current assets of £698,600, stock of £0, current liabilities of £20,794 and net worth of £200,915.

The interesting and significant movement in the accounts occurred in 2007 and 2008. In 2007 current liabilities increased from £211,500 (2006) to £1,676,933. In the same years the cash at bank increased to £1,000,069 and current assets to £1,896,014 from £235,198 in 2006. It is obvious substantial activities and acquisition or transfer of assets had taken place in this period, these assets were disposed off or transferred again in 2008 period. Since 2008 the accounts do not show any substantial movements.

The main issue need explanation in the accounts of the company is the increase in Cash at Bank in 2007. The banks would n’t give money to the company if the properties were bought on mortgage it would register against the properties and should be showing in long term or current liabilities depending on the treatment it is awarded in the accounts.  This infusion of cash showed that it is either introduced by the family in that case the comments of PMLN leaders that properties are mortgaged do not hold water. Other possibility is that the properties were re-mortgaged.

3-  Que Holdings Limited: Mr. H N Sharif appointed director on 15/7/2003.

2010 accounts of this company show stock at £0, current assets at £12,603, current liabilities at £429,526 and net worth of £307,421.

This company also shows movement in 2007, when assets increased by £1.2 million compare to 2006. The increase continued in 2008 and 2009 when assets rose by 0.5 million in each year. The current assets decreased in 2010 to the figure stated above. This means that properties were bought of transferred from another company in the period of 2007 to 2009. But disposed off or transferred again to another company in 2010.

4- Quint Gloucester Place Ltd: Mr. H N Sharif appointed director on 22/08/2006.

2010 accounts for this company show stock at £0, Current Assets at £ 38,791, Cash at Bank £0, Current Liabilities at £305,175 and net worth of £56, 124.

The Current Assets in this company rose steadily from 2007 to 2009, from £3,555,918 in 2007 to £6,536,379 in 2009; so did stock to almost same levels and stood at £6, 535,735 in 2009. It means that Assets worth almost £6.5 million were sold off or transferred in 2010.

5-  Quint Eaton Place No2 Ltd: H N Sharif appointed Secretary on 23/11/2003

This company is now dissolved.

Main activities in this company happened in 2006 and 2007. In 2006 the accounts showed stock of £2, 301, 049 which were reduced to 0 in 2007. This means that the properties were either sold or transferred to other companies in 2007. In 2007 it has Total Current Assets worth £671,032 and T C Liabilities at £332,813, and company’s net worth of £338, 219.

6- Flagship Investment Ltd: Mr. H N Sharif appointed director on 12/4/2001

This company has Total Current Assets £95,018 in 2010 accounts, T C Liabilities are £1, 496,445 with a net worth value of £435, 890 and cash at bank £3832, and stock at £0. While the stock remained 0 in last 5 years, the current assets did n’t show any significant movement either, but Current Liabilities jumped by almost £1 Million in 2010.

7- Hartson Properties Ltd: Mr. H N Sharif appointed director on 26/03/2002

This company even though showing active status, does not show any activities at all in its accounts for last 5 years and have a nominal worth of £2.

8- Quint Sloane Limited: Mr. H N Sharif appointed director on 19/11/2003

It is a Dissolved company and had no activities in its accounts of 2004.

9- Quint Limited: Mr. H N Sharif appointed Secretary on 14/7/2003, the company is dissolved now.

First point to note from these accounts is that there was another Director on this company, Mr. Asim Masood Mahmood. How much were his shares in the business?

Secondly, it seems this company was dissolved in 2007 (its last accounts shown) and its assets were transferred. Was the other Director’s share bought out and the assets of this company were transferred to another company?

It had assets worth £2,802,902 in 2006 on its books, with current liabilities standing on £2, 327, 993, while net worth of the company is shown as £320,572 and cash at bank at £18. The cash at bank increased to £209, 330 in 2007 accounts.

Movement of Assets between the UK Companies

On the surface, it seems that cross movement of assets had taken place between the companies owned by Hassan Nawaz Sharif. For example in 2007, Quint Limited was dissolved. Most probably its assets and liabilities were transferred to other companies. Another company Quint Eaton Placeno2 Ltd was also dissolved in 2007 and most probably its assets and liabilities were also transferred to other companies. Curiously both companies had Mr. Asim Masood Mahmood as one of it two Directors, the second director was Hassan Nawaz Sharif. It is highly likely that there were some transactions taken place to buy off Mr. Mahmood share in these two companies and after his ouster these two companies were dissolved. The assets and liabilities of these two companies were transferred to other companies owned by Hassan.

For example Quint Gloucester Place Limited had introduction of £3, 551,467 as stock in 2007, which jumped to £5,228,208 in 2008. Perhaps the properties from above two companies were transferred to this company in its 2007 and 2008 accounting periods. This company has also seen another change in 2010 when all of its stock of £6,535,735 is removed from the accounts, either these properties are sold or ownership transferred to another company.

Earnings from UK Companies

In the absence of Profit and Loss statements submitted to Companies House, it is impossible to find out the Income of Hassan Nawaz Sharif from his companies in the UK. Despite if one pays the prescribed fees to the Companies House. The purpose of obtaining the records of the companies owned by Hasan was to provide the information to the General Public that despite the claims by PMLN leaders that the details of accounts from theUKwould shed light on the Income of Sharifs’ family through which supposedly their lavish life styles are maintained.

Alas, as proven these accounts provide no valid information, leaving the responsibilities on the shoulder of Sharifs’ family and PMLN leadership to show the proofs to the public. Even the movement in the Companies stock or assets is minimal, and whatever movement is there it seems it is between group companies, again something which cannot be confirmed or denied from the accounts submitted to the Companies House.

One thing is certain though, the claims of PMLN leaders are not correct that the assets and Income of Nawaz Sharif’s family are transparent. Yes accounts are there to be seen, but they shed no light on the information sought by Pakistani people. They don’t show how properties were financed; how much Income these companies generated due to non submission of profit and loss accounts.

It seems that the Properties in the Company are kept as Long term investment probably generating rental income, rather than dealing short term buying and selling of the properties. But this can only be termed as a calculated guess obtained from the available accounts.

One thing is sure though, the turnover and Assets of the Companies are not enough to maintain the claims of Sharif Family and to maintain their lavish life styles. Especially when PMLN leaders claim that Nawaz Sharif personal expenses during his years in exile and even now are financed by his sons. They have to show to the Pakistani people that these companies generated enough Income to sustain the life styles of family members including Nawaz Sharif and prove their arguments and comments accurate.

Anyway, the Tag of “Billionaires” cannot be maintained with such meagre turnovers. In 6 years or so movements of stock worth only £6+ million with a likely profit of around £1 million if Properties were disposed off (not clear from the accounts though) or rental Income of a million or two over the years could hardly be called the result of family’s billions transferred to his sons by Nawaz Sharif. After all these companies must have expenses to pay too, considering how expensive Londonis, the expenses would be substantial. Not to mention the fact that according to the statements of PMLN leaders these properties are bought on 95% mortgages; financed by the banks. If these claims are correct, the vast majority of the rental Income would be offset against the Interests and Charges levied by the banks. Reducing the Income of Sharifs’s family further. PMLN leaders simply cannot cut it both ways.

PMLN Leadership is still in the same pickle this disclosure doesn’t prove their point, but increases their vows. Unless there are other properties and assets which are not declared in the public domain.

Nawaz’s Personal and Household Expenses

The issue of Rs5000 Income tax paid by NS has been regularly discussed on talk shows. In response ridiculous figures are mentioned by PMLN leaders that billions of rupees are paid in taxes by Sharif family. PMLN faces an uphill task to justify the life style of Sharif’s family on the meagre income they have shown over the years. It has been established from the regular statements made by party leaders that NS has no income of his own as such, his life style is maintained by the wealth generated by his sons and his family businesses. The details of the companies’ accounts owned by Hassan in the UK prove these claims untenable.

Contrary to earlier repeated claims by party leaders in different programs, it seems recently the practice has changed after realisation that this could become a thorny issue for NS. It has been said that NS has paid millions in taxes in last two years. This once again is a departure from earlier stated claims and raises questions, if NS didn’t have any assets before and he borrowed money from his family members how he started to have the income and how he own assets again? Where did he get the money for the new investment? If it is not new investment but old, then why the income from the investment not declared in previous years?

PMLN leadership should realise that during his exile NS still had stake in at least one family concern which is source of current surge in his tax liabilities. If he was drawing any Income from this business before 2008, he is still liable to tax as non-resident for the Income generated in Pakistan. Unless he can demonstrated he paid taxes on this income in some other country.

First let’s look at snapshots of possible and realistic expenses:

1-  Nawaz Sharif travels regularly, both overseas and nationally, which means airfares, hotel expenses, travel, food etc on his trips. It is almost a certainty that he does not travel in Economy Class, and First or Business Class costs far more than EC.

2- Nawaz Sharif (or/and his family) maintains houses in different part of the country and also overseas residences. Looking at their life styles, it is safe to assume, he has servants in many places, if not all the places. Then there is simple matter of maintenance of these properties, and running expenses like utilities bills, repairs etc.

3-  We also know that Nawaz Sharif himself and his wife both had not been well recently. They were treated in London. We can also safely say that they don’t use NHS treatment like mere mortals. It is an established fact private medical treatment is tremendously expensive in western countries. UK is not a cheap place for private treatment either.

4-  Last but not least there is notoriously large “Raiwind Palace”, running it would not be cheap. Some mentioned in TV talk shows that running expenses for “Raiwand Palace” are 2 crores a month. The figure could be an exaggeration, but the onus still remains on Sharif family to come clean and explain to the nation how they maintain such life styles on the Income and taxes they disclose.

Only 4 major expenses are highlighted above in the hope that supporters of PMLN wouldn’t complain or level charges of unreasonable expectations or estimations.

The maths is simple; NS and his family have to show that the Income received by NS and other family members either from his businesses or from his children is sufficient to cover those expenses. And that the Taxes are paid on that Income, irrespective where those incomes are generated, the tax is still payable, either overseas or in Pakistan. There is double taxation relief available between UK and Pakistan. Anything drawn by NS from any business as his personal income, he is liable to pay Income Tax on it.  Alternatively if PMLN contention is that he lives on the remittance sent by his sons, than the evidence of remittances and the taxable income of his sons should be shown, together with the taxes they paid, after all there is no free lunch, not where his sons resides. It has been repeatedly stated by PMLN leadership the money is transferred to Pakistan using legitimate means. If so let’ us see the proofs. Pakistanis already know there are allegations Mr. Ishaq Dar has testified that he transferred money for Sharifs through debateable channels; some maintain through illegal channels.

Sharif Foundation’s Hospitals

PMLN leaders constantly boost that Sahrif’s have their charitable institutions including a massive hospital in Raiwind, and unlike Imran Khan who runs his charitable institutions on donations, Sharif family run their institutions from their own pockets.

It must be said it is rather commendable if they do such deeds. But unfortunately for PMLN and Sharif’s family if this is boosting or a fact, either way, it exacerbate the problems faced by Sharif’s family.

Massive charitable institutions need money to run, if the funding does n’t come from donations it must come from the earnings and income of Sharif’s family. Therefore, Sharif family has to show their income covering not only their lavish life style but also the money needed to run their charitable institutions.

Claims by PMLN Leaders and their Contradictions

Only few examples are provided otherwise this would become a very long list.

1-  Mr. Sadiq Al Farooq

A-    In two different programs he first claimed that 65 crores were brought back to Pakistan in last two years and in second he claimed 65 crores were brought back in last 6 months.

B-  But when he was challenged by PTI Imran Ismail in the program “to the point” on 17^th November 2011 to show proof of even $100 brought back to Pakistan, Mr. Farooq failed to produce or mentioned any evidence of any amount brought back to Pakistan as per his earlier claims. He was also asked when Sharif family left Pakistan their assets and bank balances were confiscated by Musharaf regime. How they have started businesses in the UK and in Saudi Arabia. Mr. Sadiq didn’t give any plausible explanations.

C-  In same program he once again repeated his claims that NS’s businesses paid over 6 billion in taxes. When enquired does it includes sales tax, he said no it is all other type of tax. Well it is so easy to prove what taxes were paid just show us the tax returns of the businesses and Income Tax returns of the family Sharif family members.

D-  His best comments were that all the expenses of NS were paid by his businesses. He said all the industrialists properties are own by the businesses, the family household expenses are paid by the businesses too and they pay the taxes on the rest of the amount if any left. Wow, it seems in the presence of such person PMLN doesn’t need any opposition accountant or lawyer he is enough to destroy the case of PMLN. Different taxes payable by individuals on any money drawn for personal or household expenses, personal expenses received, benefits in kind received, or profit from different Incomes, dividends etc are already listed earlier in this article. He specifically mentioned that cars were owned by the businesses and running costs including petrol was paid by the businesses. Someone needs to explain to Mr. Sadiq Al Farooq that all the personal usage is taxable as benefits in kind. Otherwise tax system would be open to monumental abuses.

2- Mr. Ahsan Iqbal

A- In the Program “Off the record” with Kashif dated 31/10/11 AI said NS has submitted details of his assets in 2008. In response to a question by the host, he responded the list produced by NS is accurate.

B- In response to another question that NS is in debited to his wife and sons, do you think he is in such financial difficulties? AI responded when NS became PM he disassociated himself from all the Businesses. In that case it would be very easy for PMLN to provide details of the assets NS had on a particular date and how assets were divided and transferred to his children and wife.  If any fixed assets were sold or the liquid assets or any other businesses assets were transferred overseas to start overseas ventures? If so then by using what means and where? Show us the proofs.

C- In response to another question AI responded by saying; PM and President are all answerable to the Courts too. For all practical reasons, if no one has challenged it until now, even though the Government is a sworn enemy (of NS), then we have to believe that there are no inaccuracies in the list submitted by NS. First of all quoting PM and President makes the whole argument self defeating, Pakistanis know the truth about their affairs. The other argument is dealt in other places in this article.

D-  On 2/11/11 in the same program Ahsan Iqbal said categorically NS has not taken any money out of Pakistan. This contradicts claims by other PMLN leaders it is explained in other places too.

3-   Mr. Khawaja Asif 

A)  In program “off the record” on 24/3/11 Mr. Asif said, that all the properties owned by Hassan Nawaz are mortgaged and financed by various banks.

B)  Mr. Khawaja also disclosed that Hassan owns (more accurately the Companies controlled by Hassan) properties in Mayfair and Park Lane in London.

C)  Mr. Asif also disclosed that Hassan had been in the UK since mid 90’s for over 14-16 years. He disclosed that some properties in the UK were bought 3-4 years before Hassan’s arrival in the UK. This disclosure opens a can of worm for NS and his family. If Hassan was not resident in theUK whose name were these properties before they are taken over by the companies of Hassan? How they were bought or financed? How the money transferred to the UK and whose name? Unfortunately for Mr. Asif the earliest Mr. Hassan became a Director of a Company listed above is in April 2001. This makes it only 10 years not 14-16 years as claimed. Name of his business associate in two dissolved companies is already mentioned earlier. Transactions for the take over his investment took place between 2006 and 2007. Mr. Asif’s facts are rather thin on the ground. We also have a categorical statement by Ahsen Iqbal that NS have taken no money out of the country. How Mr. Asif would provide proofs of 5% down payments paid for the Properties?

D) Mr. Asif also disclosed that all the properties owned by Hassan (his companies) are mortgaged and bought by paying 5% advances while rest of the investment is financed by the banks. Residents of the UK know even 14 years ago banks would n’t give 95% loans for commercial properties, despite whatever claims are made by Mr. Asif. It was possible and was the practice to obtain even 100% mortgage on your residential property (only one) but not on commercial properties. Anyhow, it should be very easy for PMLN to show the documents if what Mr. Khawaja says is right. Why are they reluctant?

Secondly, the problem of properties bought before Hassan’s arrival in theUKaccording to Mr. Asif, is never solved by PMLN. Even 5% down payments for the properties; if we to accept Mr. Asif’s explanations (not a remote possibility); are quite a substantial amount. How this money was transferred to London ?

We also have AI categorical statement that NS has taken no amount out of Pakistan. How these 5% were paid? More accurate representation of banks loans for purchase of commercial properties is 65% to 75%. This means NS family must have paid anything between 25% to 35% advances for the properties.

E)  Mr. Asif also disclosed that the steel mill in Saudia Arabia is owned by NS other son Hussein. Rumours has it, it was transferred from Dubai. Any how it’s Acquisition or transfer from Dubai, whatever the facts may be, it has to be proven by PMLN. It is their responsibility to dispel all doubts and show clear evidence of their business dealings to Pakistani nation. Pakistani nation wants credible evidence and plausible explanations, not off the cuff remarks in talk shows.

4- Mr. Hanif Abbassi

A)  Mr. Abbassi is quite vocal on the assets issue in talk shows, usually repeating the arguments presented by other leaders of PMLN, these arguments are already listed above.

B) Mr. Abbassi recently attacked Imran Khan and wanted to know how much taxes Imran paid from his income during his playing years in theUK. Perhaps Mr. Abbassi is either unaware of the Taxation Laws in theUK, or he is deliberating trying to mislead, later looks more likely. In the UK all sport organisations who employ professional sportsmen like Cricketers, Footballers or Rugby players deduct the taxes on their income at source. Most sportsmen are paid on PAYE basis, where the taxes are deducted from their monthly or weekly wages. Mr. Abbasi said nation wants to know how Imran paid his taxes during his years as a professional. Mr. Abbasi, Imran can defend himself, but don’t you think similarly Pakistani nation also wants to know the sources of Sharifs’ family income which can sustain their lavish life styles. Hopefully you would be man enough to address the issues raised in this article, for the sake of consistency and honesty.

Proofs required from Sharifs

Pakistani nation wants to see, first of all how much Income tax the individuals members of the family specifically Nawaz Sharif’ and his family has paid, lets say in least last 20 years.

What were the sources of their income, where that income was generated and declared and how it was transferred toPakistan.

They have to provide details of their expenses, especially of Nawaz Sharif and show that the income or transfer of money from overseas is sufficient to meet those expenses.

They also have to show in precise manner, how much actual Profits generated and CT or Income tax paid on those profits by their businesses in last 20 years. Both in Pakistan and overseas.

Any duties and sales taxes paid should be listed separately from actual Taxes on income or profits. Duties and sales taxes are collected on behalf of the state and are not taxes paid directly by the individuals or business. A business could pay back billions collected on behalf of the Revenue in connection with duties and sales tax or VAT, but still make a loss for the year and don’t pay any Income Tax or CT on profits at all.

We need to know, how much were actual profits of the businesses, how much business tax or Corporation tax was paid by the businesses and how much personal tax paid by Sharif family on the money allocated to them for personal expenditures. Was that money enough to sustain their lavish life style and the money they allegedly spent on their charitable institutions?

Pakistanis also want to know where the wealth Nawaz Sharif and his family allegedly had for decades is. If his sons started businesses both in the UK and Saudi Arabiaon Bank Loans and Mortgages according to PMLN leadership then this money must have been kept safely somewhere, where is it? How that money was transferred outside ofPakistan? Or is it still inPakistan, if it is where is it kept?

Conclusions

PMLN instead of firing the blanks or making meaningless and purposefully misleading statements should own up to the people of Pakistan and talk in a manner befitting a political party.

People are wiser and would n’t be distracted from uneducated and corrupt politicians who are in the Politics for one reason only to make money using unethical and immoral means, including theft and loot of national resources.

Mr. Khawaja Asif advised people that accounts for Hassan’s companies are available after payment of fixed fees; one has to spend a fiver to obtain them. First of all, he should be aware that for small companies there are exemptions for accounts disclosure. Hassan’s companies are registered and classified as small companies, with only abbreviated versions of the Balance Sheet provided as accounts. Providing Income Statement is not an obligation for small companies. Pakistani people need to know how life styles like kings are maintained on small companies’ accounts. Mr. Asif shouldn’t worry many have spent those fivers, and £4 needed for property searches.

We are at our wits end listening to incredibly unreliable and untruthful politicians; we want the truth, nothing but the truth.

It is an era of openness, era of credible and responsible people. Pakistani politicians have played enough games with poor people of Pakistan. It is duty of all educated Pakistanis and overseas Pakistanis to spread the word, to catch these immoral characters; they are literally getting away with day time robberies. They come across as a cross between a Pantomime and a Puppet Show. The Spivs who caused mega corruptions in the first place, should not and could not be trusted with the nation’s resources and wealth again, enough is enough.

All rights reserved © 2011

Articles of faith II: Finality of Prophet Hood

Preface 

To tackle the issue of finality of Prophethood on our beloved Prophet Muhammad SAW in the context and in the light of writings and claims of Mirza is a daunting task. A lot can be written and plenty of contradictory material from the writings of Mirza could be produced to prove the point. So many people have written about this issue with usual approach, to lump together different quotes from Mirza to prove his claims of Prophet Hood after Prophet Muhammad SAW, showing he violated a basic tenant and belief in the religion of Islam.

This is the most sensitive subject, it arises passion amongst the Muslims. In this article a conscious effort is made to adopt a different and new approach to highlight the heresies of Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani and his breach of the fundamental belief of the Muslims, which resulted him and his followers declared to be out of the pale of Islam by the Muslims around the world.

Quranic evidence: Finality of Prophethood

Many articles and books are written on this issue containing arguments on the meanings and implications of the following verse in the Holy Quran. 

33:40 [And know, O believers, that] Muhammad is not the father of any one of your men, but is God’s Apostle and the Seal of all prophets. And God has indeed full knowledge of everything.

Instead of comparing it with the meanings used for this verse by Mirza and Qadianis; understanding of the Muslims in general of this verse would be shown before moving to produce evidence from this cult related to this topic.

According to the Muslims this verse is denoting that Prophet SAW is the last of the Prophets. Just as a seal (Khatam) marks the end of a document i.e. it is placed at the end of the document after the document is finished/completed attesting the contents of the documents. This ties up nicely with the verse in the Holy Quran announcing the completion of the religion of Islam.

Apart from this, the term Khatam is also synonymous with Khitam, which denotes the “end” or “conclusion” of a thing or task or a chain in case of Prophethood. It means that the message revealed through Muhammad SAW – the Qur’an – must be regarded as the culmination and the end of all prophetic revelation.

Mirza was well aware of this fact, he writes;

The other allegations made against me that I am denier of Laila-tul- Qadar, miracles, Miraj, end of Prophet Hood (on Prophet Muhammad SAW) and a claimant of Prophet Hood, all these objections are false and are based on lies. In all these matters, my religion (beliefs) is the same which is the religion (beliefs) of other members of Jamat of Ahle Sunnah. These objections by my opponents and critics are false/ wrong, which are based on my writings in the books Tawzeeh-e-Mariam and Azala-e-Auham. Now, I announce in clear terms to the Muslims, I believe in the finality of Prophet Hood on Prophet SAW, I consider the person who is the denier of the finality of Prophet Hood (on Prophet Muhammad SAW) out of the pale of Islam and a non-believer. Similarly I am a believer in the angels, miracles and Laila-tul-Qadar.

After giving this undertaking, Mirza as was his practice, used every imaginable excuse to declare himself as Prophet, and to falsely equate himself with Prophet Muhammad SAW. His deceptions and lies and that’s of Lahori Qadianis are already exposed in the first segment in the article “Recitation of Kalima”; the Lahoris try to adopt the same cunning practices adopted by Mirza.

Mirza writes;

It is in the nature and purpose of a Prophet to receive religious education from Gabriel. This is proven that now the prophetic revelations have discontinued until the Day of the Judgement.

These two arguments together with other arguments are included on the Web sites of Lahoris. This lie of Mirza is already busted in our previous article. Lahoris are opportunistic liars, their sole purpose is to fool the Muslims by claiming that they believe in the finality of Prophethood on Prophet Muhammad SAW and that Qadianis are wrong to claim and accept Mirza as a Prophet, though Mirza (according to discredited Lahoris) never claimed the prophethood. They also include another quotations which is just a year before the death of Mirza, in which he writes;

A charge is level against me that I am a claimant of Prophethood, and I have formed a new religion, or I am thinking to have a separate Qibla, having devised different “Namaz” (Salah) prayers, or that I have cancelled the (Holy) Quran and devised my own Quran. In response to all these allegations I can only say “lanatullaha alal kazabeen” (curse be on the liars).

We can only say, curse of Allah SWT, all His Angels, and All the Muslims be on you Mirza Kazzab. Mirza you did claim the Prophethood, but until last, until the day of your death you were a liar and a deceitful person. You wrote in double speech and issued contradictory claims to fool the Muslims and your uneducated followers.

Different meanings used by Mirza and his followers for the word “Khatam-un-Nabbiyan”

Mirza Tahir, Ka-lip IV in a sermon delivered on 7^th April 1985 stated; (All quotes are from their official website from a book which is composed on this sermon)

“They have no inkling of the true meaning and significance of ‘Khatamul-Anbiyya’ and ‘Khatame-Nabbuwat’. They inherited a word or two from their ancestors but remain ignorant of the true meaning of this important concept.”

Mirza has the best understanding of this word, claimed Ka-Lip IV

He said;

The depth and true understanding of ‘Khatame-Nabbuwat’ possessed by the Promised Messiah (peace be on him) was without equal. The Ulema and other opponents cannot achieve an iota of this understanding.

Surely, we agree, nobody has twisted the meanings of this term more than Mirza in the history of Islam. We intend to pose a test for the followers of Mirza at the end of this article, to prove that Mirza indeed did have the best understanding of this term, albeit a false one based on lies and deceptions.

Ka-Lip IV writes further that no Muslim before Mirza could grasp the meanings of this term;

The Promised Messiah (peace be on him) says: “The charge levelled against me and my Jamaat that we do not believe the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) to be ‘Khatamun- Nabbiyeen’ is a calumny. The fact is, the force, the certainty, the passion and the solid conviction with which we believe the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) to be ‘Khatamul-Anbiyya’ is so strong and overwhelming and of such excellence that it is a hundred thousand times stronger than the belief of our accusers. They have no inkling of the true meaning and significance of ‘Khatamul-Anbiyya’ and ‘Khatame-Nabbuwat’. They inherited a word or two from their ancestors but remain ignorant of the true meaning of this important concept.

Mirza was given Divine knowledge of this Word

Ka-Lip IV quoted Mirza;

We, on our part, believe the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) to be ‘Khatamul-Anbiyya with a God given insight into the meaning of this lofty station. This elixir of heavenly wisdom that I have enjoyed is beyond the imagination of those not allowed to partake of it.”(Malfoozat – Sayings of the Promised Messiah (peace be on him) vol. 1 pg. 328).

The Promised Messiah (peace be on him) further says: The sum total and the essence of our belief is enshrined in “La llaha illalaho Muhammadur Rasool lullah: there is no God but Allah, Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah”. The strong faith which we uphold in this life and with which, by God’s Grace, we shall leave this worldly abode, is that our Lord and Master, Muhammad Mustafa (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) is ‘Khatamun-Nabbiyeen’ and ‘Khatamul- Mursaleen’. He is the best of all prophets. With his advent faith was perfected and reached its zenith and is now the only route which directs man to attain closeness to our creator.” (Azala- i-Auham pg. 69)

It is established that according to above quotations Mirza says the meanings of this word is that Prophet SAW is best of all the Prophets.

Mirza also said through Prophet SAW, the faith (Islam) is perfected and reached its height.

Why then do we need anyone else to revive Islam? How some one can add to a religion, which is already completed and perfected according to the decree in the Holy Quran (5:3),“today have I perfected your religion for you, and have bestowed upon you the full measure of My blessings”.

How some one like Mirza can increase the blessing of Allah SWT, when Allah SWT clearly decreed that He SWT has bestowed the full measure of His SWT blessing on Muslims through Quran and Prophet Muhammad SAW?

How a liar like Mirza can add to already completed religion of Islam and increase the full blessing of Allah SWT? Can he increase in something which is already given fully according to the Quranic decree? Given that his credibility is destroyed completely, gradually in our articles, together with deliberate lies of his followers.

Revelations can have flaws (nauzobillah)?

During this sermon Ka-Lip IV further said;

“That is why he was chosen to be a recipient of the divine revelation that was the most powerful, flawless, noblest and the most comprehensive.” (Surma- i-Chasma- i-Arya pg. 23)

Mirza, are you sure of what you are saying? Most flawless? You mean the revelations can have flaws? Yes Mirza, the alleged revelation to false prophets and liars like you can have flaws, which we have demonstrated in our previous articles, but the revelations to the true Prophets of Allah SWT can never ever have flaws and errors.

Mirza’s Flawed knowledge of the Holy Quran

The Promised Messiah (peace be on him) says: “Our Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) was an embodiment of the beauty and grace found in all divine dispensations. As the Holy Quran says “Fa Be Huda Ho Muqtade…” “so follow thou their guidance…” (Ch 6, V. 91). Meaning that the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) should follow the guidance given to all prophets. The one encompassing in him all divine guidance would therefore be the most outstanding and most exalted prophet. (Chasma Massihi, pg. 61)

Mirza quoted V 90 of Surah An’am; in verses 85 and 86, Prophet Zakria As, Yahyah As, Isa As, Ilyas As, Ismael As, Yonus As, Loot As are mentioned with the proclamations that they were righteous Prophets, given favour and were placed on higher status and station compared to ordinary people. The preceding verses decreed that some of their forefather and brothers of theirs were also elected by Allah SWT and guided to the right path. And Allah SWT guides to whom He Will to the right path. If they the Prophets and those who were guided to the right path, had they ascribed divinity to any one else then Allah SWT, all their good deed would have counted for naught.

After the back ground and context, now we quote both 89 and 90 for full understanding;

 6:89[but] it was to them that We vouchsafed revelation, and sound judgment, and prophethood. And now, although the unbelievers may choose to deny these truths, [know that] We have entrusted them to people who will never refuse to acknowledge them.

The message in this verse is for all the followers of earlier Prophets, in particular for the Jews and the Christians; in the context of recent and recent past history at the time of the revelations of the Holy Quran. Because of their ignorance and opposition to the teachings, authority and Prophethood of earlier Prophets, Allah SWT has given this blessing to the new People i.e. Muslims , who according to the Quranic teachings have to accept and exalt the status of all the past True Prophets of Allah SWT and they will never refuse to acknowledge them. The Muslims would never deny their Prophethood and their teachings and revelations given to the earlier true Prophets.

This command was ignored by Mirza, he has attacked Prophet Isa As of the Holy Quran, his lies against the revelations in the Holy Quran were produced in our earlier article “Mirza attacks Prophet Isa As” and in our recent article “Recitation of Kalima”.

The word used in above verse is “Yakafiro” deniers, or unbelievers i.e. Kaffirs. Proof yet again from the Holy Quran that Mirza was a Kaffir to deny the truthfulness and teachings of Prophet Isa As of the Holy Quran and in the process to attribute white lies to the Holy Quran. 

6:90

to those whom God has guided. Follow, then, their guidance, [and] say: “No reward do I ask of you for this [truth]: behold, it is but an admonition unto all mankind!”

The command and admonition is to all the mankind, and not to Prophet SAW, as Mirza falsely tried to imply. This verse is continuation from the V89, which ended on the note that now, the blessings have been passed on to and entrusted to the new people i.e. Muslims who would never deny them, even though the followers of earlier Prophets may deny that this blessing is passed to the Muslims.

In verse 90 it is also decreed “No reward do I ask of you for this Truth. What was this truth? This truth is mentioned in the V88, “And had they ascribed divinity to aught beside Him- in vain, would have been all (the good) that they ever did”.

Not surprisingly, Mirza also didn’t conformed with this command in the Holy Quran, he claimed divinity for himself, the verse clearly described that all the good they did would be in vain for the people who ascribed divinity to anyone beside Allah SWT.

It is abundantly clear, Mirza has absolutely no understanding of the Holy Quran, which put in to prospective the claims of Ka-Lip that such understanding of the Holy Quran and the verse was never given to anyone. Nevertheless these verses also prove that Mirza himself was a denier or a Kaffir.

Why there is a need for Mirza?

 Ka-Lip IV continues;

The Promised Messiah (peace be on him) says: “It is no longer necessary to follow separately each previous prophet and his teachings, since the message brought by Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) encompasses and surpasses all previous teachings. All other paths leading to God are now closed. All verities leading to God are contained in this teaching. There is no other truth after this. All true prior teachings are contained in these teachings. His prophethood is the culmination of all prophets and rightly so. (Al-Wassiyyat, pg. 17-18)

Why there is a need for Mirza?

Why then Mirza persistently lied about the teachings of the Holy Quran? And as he wrote himself, when all verities leading to God are contained in the Quranic teachings then why oh why there is any need for revelations after the Holy Quran? If there is no truth after the Holy Quran and Prophet Muhammad SAW, then surely, whoever claims that he has been given the Prophetic revelations is a liar indeed. Mirza you were priceless.

Yet another lie of Mirza against Holy Quran exposed

In his Persian poetry, the Promised Messiah (peace be on him) says: ‘Ahn Rasool Khash… Suwai Mustafa.” That prophet whose name is Muhammad, his pure and faultless guidance alone, I hold firmly in my hands. He is the best of all prophets and the best of all mankind.

In this context, I would invite you to read the Promised Messiah’s (peace be on him) dissertation on “Da Na Fata Dalla” – ‘Then the Prophet drew near to Allah; then Allah leaned down towards him.’ (Holy Quran ch. 53 v.9) [Surma- i-Chashma-i-Arya pg. 82-87).

The Ka-Lip IV quoted from the book of Mirza. Mirza wrote that Allah SWT leaned down towards Prophet SAW. Whenever we are writing an article on the heresies of Mirza, we are lost for words to describe the abhorrent nature of this liar. We purposefully selected this sermon as evidence because through it, we can unmask Mirza from the quotes used by the Ka-Lip IV and also the crookedness of this Ka-Lip (IV) who claimed he was chosen by God.

It also provides plenty of references to Muslim brothers and sisters from the books of Mirza on this topic, making it easier to understand his writings and his lies.

Verse quoted by Mirza is V8, which decreed;

53:8 and then drew near, and came close, 

Let’s look at the preceding verses to see the right context and to establish did Allah SWT lean down towards Prophet Muhammad SAW, as claimed by Mirza?

53:5 something that a very mighty one has imparted to him:

This verse is describing Gabriel the bearer of the revelations to Prophet SAW and to all the earlier true Prophets.

According to the Quranic teachings and authentic traditions, Prophet SAW only saw Gabriel As twice in his true angelic manifestation, i.e. with his As true shape and nature. This is the real meanings of the word “Istawa” in this context. These true manifestations of Gabriel occurred in period of “Fatrat al-Wahi”. This incident is described in 81:23 and in “Ascension”.

81:23 he truly beheld [the angel - beheld] him on the clear horizon;

We can only laugh at Mirza for his knowledge of the Holy Quran. He had the front to claim he was chosen by Allah SWT to revive Islam. How can he revive Islam when he persistently lies about the revelations in the Holy Quran? When he can not even understand very basic revelations in the Holy Quran? Qadianis should ponder on it. It is very easy to make lofty and outrageous claims but when we look at the evidence in cold light of the day, Mirza is found wanting.

Prophet Muhammad SAW has the highest rank amongst Prophets and seal of approval for coming Prophets (nauzobillah)

We come to the main point and sole purpose of this segment apart from Mirza’s lies and his injure knowledge of the Holy Quran we exposed in between the quotes used by Ka-Lip IV. 

The Promised Messiah (peace be on him) writes, “He was declared ‘Khatamul-Anbiyya’ not in the sense that mankind would be deprived of his spiritual blessings for all times to come, rather, in the sense that he alone was the Master of the Seal and all spiritual blessings would be conferred only through him. Further, the door to divine revelations would not be closed on his Ummah till the day of judgement. There is no other prophet with his rank. He is ‘The Khatim’. He alone holds the seal. Prophethood can still be invested through his seal of approval and on his followers alone.” (Haqiqatul-Wahi pg. 27-28)

As we said earlier, after giving assurances to the Muslims that he believes in the finality i.e. end of Prophet Hood on Prophet SAW, Mirza showed his true colours. Secondly, this quote from the book of Mirza also put to rest the claims of Lahori Qadianis that Mirza believed in the finality of Prophet Hood on Prophet Muhammad SAW. Here he clearly written, Prophet Muhammad SAW is the Master of the Seal of Prophet Hood, the door of divine revelations is not closed to the Ummah of Prophet Muhammad SAW until the day of the Judgment. The prophet hood can still be invested on the followers of Prophet SAW, with his SAW seal of approval.

Ka-Lip continued and quoted Mirza again;

The final authority rests with the governor. Similarly, the one in whom prophethood found its perfection was declared The Seal of The Prophets – ‘Khatamun-Nabbiyeen’, as there is no rank higher than his. (Mobahesa Shahjahanpur pg.24- 25).

We got another meaning of the term, it denotes perfection of Prophet Hood on Prophet SAW, and he SAW is holder of the highest rank.

Khatamiyyat means perfection

Ka-lip said;

Here too, we find ‘Khatamiyyat’ meaning perfection and ultimate in prophethood and authority rather than meaning ‘the last’. Some Ulema have described ‘Khatamiyyat’ to mean a signet ring used for adornment, denoting that the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) imparted heavenly beauty and grace to all prophets. He was The Seal that testified to the truth of all other prophets. This, the Promised Messiah (peace be on him) argued was the Holy Prophet’s (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) favour on all other prophets. That is why I have asserted that ‘Khatamiyyat’ is beyond the limitations of time and space. It cannot be taken to mean ‘the last’. It has a much broader and universal implication.

Prophet Hood still continues

There is, however, one form of prophethood that has not come to an end. The prophethood granted by virtue of unqualified obedience to him and which derives its lustre from the divine light of Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be on him). It continues because of him and his image. (Chasma- i-Maarfat pg. 324)

This in fact is the second segment of the  article just published, this concept of continuity of Prophet Hood after Prophet SAW is overwhelmingly present in the writings of Mirza but Lahoris due to their dishonesty and deceptions, are still paddling their lies after 100 years.

Mirza is a Prophet because he is a true follower of Prophet SAW

Ka-Lip said;

Recalling his status as the Promised Messiah and the divinely bestowed title of prophethood, he says in his book, Tajalliyat- i- illahiya (pg. 24-25)

 “This status and title has been bestowed on me only because I am a true follower and servant of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him). If I had not been from his Ummah and if I had not been his follower, then even if my services and talents had been as massive and tall as the mountains of this world, I would not have acquired or been bestowed the title and honor of direct communication with God. This is true because all doors to prophethood are now closed, except the portal and the prophethood of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him). After him, there can be no independent prophet with a new law or code. Now, the only type of prophethood that remains is that which is without any new shariah other than of Islam and which is bestowed on a true follower or servant of the Holy Prophet of Islam.”

 “I would not have acquired or been bestowed the title and honour of direct communication with God.”

Acquired, are you sure Mirza? You mean to say that Prophethood can be acquired? How one can acquire Prophethood? Is it available in a shop? Is it a degree acquired from a University? What price would you pay to acquire it? Are you talking in the context of “acquiring knowledge”? You mean the Prophethood can be acquired by knowledge? By research? We know Mirza you used this acquired knowledge on another major issue, which we intend to expose in the future.

We throw these challenges to the followers of Mirza.

1-    Prove that Mirza was a true follower of Prophet Muhammad SAW on any major and fundamental belief. And he annihilated himself in the love of Prophet SAW as he claimed. That he has likeness to him SAW, that he obeyed the commands of the Holy Quran that he didn’t attack Prophet Isa As and also at different places our beloved Prophet Muhammad SAW.

2-    Prove any major service Mirza performed for Islam.

3-    Prove that Mirza did not bring any new Shariah. He definitely tried to abolish the Shariah of Prophet SAW by claiming that the command to strive in the name of Allah SWT is annulled after his advent.

 4-    Evidence was produced in the article “Repeat of an Error” that according to Mirza only window of Prophet Hood open is following “Sirat-e-Siddique”. Who was this Siddique? It has to be a person to have a Sirat. Secondly, how did Mirza followed the Sirat of this Siddique? Proofs in Mirza’s own words were provided that he lied on the bravery of his grand father. Until now, no Qadiani has defended Mirza and prove that he was Sadiq.

Ka-Lip continued;

The Promised Messiah (peace be on him) holds the view that one of the meanings of ‘Khatamun- Nabbiyeen’ is that a law-bearing prophet can no longer come because ‘Khatamiyyat’ encompasses the ultimate in prophethood and its teachings. A perfect teaching needs no replacement unless it is tampered with. On one hand we have Allah’s guarantee that Quran will be protected, on the other hand we have the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) as the ‘Khatamun-Nabbiyeen’. It therefore stands to reason that a new law is not needed. The teachings of the Holy Quran and the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) will sustain us till the end of times. The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) is reported to have said that he and the Day of Judgment are as close together as two fingers of a hand. Meaning his law and teachings will continue till the end of times without interference or abrogation. This is exactly what the Promised Messiah (peace be on him) has said. Our opponents attack us, claiming dichotomy in our belief. We believe that the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) is ‘Khatamun-Nabbiyeen’ and that the door to the advent of a non- law bearing prophet is still open. This is what riles them.

As we said before, we will write separate articles on other issues arising from these quotations, but we can not resist the temptation to raise some valid points.

1- Ka-Lip IV says a perfect teaching needs no replacement unless it is tampered with. So why we needed Mirza and his teachings? Did he mean to say that Quranic teachings are tempered with? Did he mean to say that the promise contained in the Holy Quran by Allah SWT to protect Quran from corruption is incorrect (nauzobillah)?

2-  No new Law is needed; the Law of Prophet SAW will stand until the day of the Judgment. Then why is the need of Mirza or any one else?

3- Why Mirza did replaced the perfect teachings of the Holy Quran? For example he;

A-   Cancelled the command of striving in the cause of Allah SWT.

B-   Practically replaced Zakat with Chanda’s for the benefit of his family.

Mirza is an independent Prophet

Ka-lip continues;

These writings reject the theory that the Messiah of Nazareth will come back in his physical form as he would not belong to the Ummah. Moreover, he would need to learn the Quran and the Hadith. Some would claim that this would be taught to him by God.

In that event, he would be an independent prophet, not needing the mediation of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him). All these arguments are contrary to the thinking and writings of the holy men and saints of the past. 

We intend to write a separate article on the issues of Law bearing prophets, i.e. Independent according to Mirza and his followers and non-Law bearing, i.e. dependent prophets. We leave this argument for now. In future articles on Prophet ISA As we will also expand and investigate the twist applied by the Ka-Lip IV “in his (as) Physical form.”

But revealing indeed is Ka-Lip IV acceptance that Mirza is an independent Prophet, which can be deduce from his reasoning to prove the status of Isa As as independent Prophet. He said that some claim that Isa As would be taught the Holy Quran by Allah SWT in that case he As would be an independent Prophet because he would not need the mediation of the Holy Prophet SAW. He As therefore would break the seal of Prophet Hood.  So what was the status of Mirza based on the arguments presented by Ka-Lip against the second coming of Prophet Isa As?

Mirza in RK V 14 P394 writes; 

“Mehdi is not a student of anybody. I swear that this to be my condition. Nobody can prove that any person has taught me the Holy Quran”.

Similar claims are printed in Tadkirah which is a divine book, we must emphasise.

Mirza said he was taught the Holy Quran by Allah SWT, therefore, the objection raised by the Ka-Lip for the second coming of Isa As applied to Mirza too. In that case he has broken the seal of the Prophet Hood, by becoming an independent prophet, using the arguments and logic of Ka-Lip IV.

There are other absurdities in this quote;

1- Mirza says that he is been sent to the people whose forefathers were unaware of divine revelations. Mirza as a matter of fact, preached to the Muslims, majority of his followers, bar few, were Muslims; who due to the lies and deception of Mirza became Qadianis. Muslims already had the Quranic teachings with them therefore they were not unaware of divine revelations.

2- Mirza’s claims of him being taught Quran by Allah SWT is bogus indeed, we are systematically destroying this myth created by Mirza by constant lies and deception against the revelations of the Holy Quran. 

Overwhelming evidence of his lies against the revelation of the Holy Quran was presented in previous articles; more presented in this article too. Future articles will demonstrate even more and more.

This is the height of ignorance by the Qadiani cult. We simply can not blame the ordinary followers of Mirza, when a Ka-Lip who claimed to be chosen by God, is destroying the whole foundation of his cult, due to his ignorance or to put it correctly in his cleverness.

We can only thank Ka-Lip IV for admitting Mirza did break the seal of Prophet Hood by claiming to be an Independent Prophet to use their own analogy and reasoning. And also that he did not derive his Prophet Hood from Prophet SAW, as he claimed; he was taught the Holy Quran directly by Allah SWT.

Couple this fact and the fact that Mirza claimed Prophet Muhammad SAW did not understand the meanings of some of the Verses in the Holy Quran, a picture of a person, who is independent from our Holy Prophet SAW emerges. Even if we do not ask the question, how Mirza could be shadow or buroz of Prophet SAW, when he did not have any attributes of Prophet SAW?

We wish Ka-Lip IV was alive today we could had some interesting conversations with him. At least he had the courage to do Q & A sessions, albeit, staged, closely monitored and organised affairs. Unfortunately, Masroor is completely devoid of any knowledge and confidence, no wonder he does not stage Q & A sessions.

Allah SWT shows His SWT’s miracles in mysterious ways, indeed. We don’t need to show the evidence that Mirza off course had teachers, but why object, when job is already done for you?

What is the meaning of the Word Khatam?

Even though we have seen many articles on the meanings of the Word used in the Holy Quran to declare that Prophet Hood has culminated on the person of Prophet Muhammad SAW, and there to be no other prophet of any kind after him SAW. But we have never seen this evidence quoted anywhere before. We would stand corrected if the evidence is produced, but it is our understanding at the time of writing this article.

From earlier quotations used in the sermon, different meanings given by Mirza can be deduced;

1- He is the best of all the prophets.

2- Through Prophet SAW, the faith (Islam) is perfected and reached its height.

3- Master of the Seal and all spiritual blessings would be conferred only through him.

4- He is ‘The Khatim’. He alone holds the seal. Prophethood can still be invested through his seal of approval and on his followers alone.”

5-  ‘Khatamun-Nabbiyeen’, as there is no rank higher than his.

6- A law-bearing prophet can no longer come because ‘Khatamiyyat’ encompasses the ultimate in prophethood and its teachings

7- Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) is ‘Khatamun-Nabbiyeen’ and that the door to the advent of a non- law bearing prophet is still open.

In all the arguments presented earlier in this article by Mirza and Ka-Lip IV, different meanings used to demonstrate that “KhattamunNabiyyan” means Prophet SAW is the seal of the Prophets or best of the Prophets. Nevertheless, the term was synonymous with the Prophets, i.e. he SAW is best amongst the Prophets. Meaning there were many Prophets (124,000 by some estimate); even if we take the examples of the Prophets mentioned by name in the Holy Quran; Prophet Muhammad SAW was the best or of the highest rank, or most exalted amongst them.

The Last word on the term Khatam

In his book Azala-e-Auham P172 Mirza writes;

Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani Ponder (he is the) seal of Khuda (Allah SWT) (word used by Mirza is Khattam RabulAlameen). In it there is a hint that in this century (Allah SWT) has appointed the reviver of religion. Human wisdom can not accept, that Proud Khuda (Allah SWT) wouldn’t timely disclose arrival of a Reviver of the century at the time of a great Fitna. 

First observation to make, there is a full stop after the word “Khatam RabulAlameen, therefore, the following sentences after the phrase Khattam RabulAlameen are separate and not the continuation from this phrase.

In the Persian translation of his name Mirza added 1300, which is the sum total of his name according to Mirza, calculated by using cabalistic practice of Gemetria. We have another article almost ready on this issue, therefore, we move on to the issue at hand. But it is also possible here he is writing 1300 A.H. meanings he has chosen or elected in 1300 A.H.

This is rather interesting and an outrageous quote, it is quoted as an alleged divine revelation, therefore it will be interesting to explore it in future articles, to expose Mirza. The figure of 1300 is added in the Persian commentary by Mirza, it is not in the alleged revelations. But there is no doubt that Mirza has used the Phrase “Khatam Rabulalameen” with his name Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani and interlinked it with the word “Fazalika”, this could only mean that Mirza is the “Khatam Rabulalameen”. No other meaning can be derived from this Ilham. There is a continuation from his name to the term used and then Mirza placed a full stop in the revelations before writing other sentences. This Sentence is complete on its own.

We listed different meanings according to Mirza, to highlight all the meanings given for the Word “KhattamunNabayyian”. The main purpose was to highlight the arguments presented by Mirza, to show that Prophet SAW is the best of, or seal of the Prophets and not the final Prophet, as per Muslim beliefs and teachings of Islam.

Therefore, we ask Qadianis, what this phrase means in the above quotation?

1- Allah SWT is the seal of Rabulalameen (nauzobillah)?

2- Allah SWT is the best of Rabulalameen (Nauzobillah)?

3- Allah SWT is the culmination of Rabulalameen (Nauzobillah)?

4- Through the seal of Allah SWT, other Rabulalameen can come (nauzobillah)?

5- No Rabulalameen can come outside the seal of Allah SWT (nauzobillah)?

6- Only the non-Shari Rabulalameen can come (nauzobillah)?

7-  Or is it an ultimate insult and it means Mirza is the seal of Rabulalameen (nauzobillah)? This is the only correct meanings which can be derived from the alleged revelations of Mirza.

In this case all of the above descriptions and meanings given for the term “khatam” by Mirza and his followers apply to him in conjunction with RabulAlameen?

Conclusions

We know that Qadianis will create hue and cry, accusing us to misrepresent the writings of Mirza. But they should remember we have gone to great lengths in this article to produce the authentic quotes from the writings of Mirza. Quotes which were used by their Ka-Lip IV to demonstrate that no one understood the meanings of the word “Khatam” better then Mirza.

Fact of the matter is Mirza has used this word as an alleged divine revelation. His use of the word Khatam with Rabulalameen just destroyed each and every meaning given by him and his followers including Ka-Lip IV.

That’s it folks, this is the last word on the word “khatam unNabiyyan” and on explanations given by Mirza and his followers. Mirza is caught in the web of his own lies and deceit.

Word of advice for his followers, we always back up our writings and articles. We advice his followers to desist from using their usual tactics to provide justifications and taweels. No amount of twisting can break Mirza free from his lies and his blatant use of the word Khatam with the phrase Rabulalameen. They should remember Mirza didn’t use the term Katam for Mujaddid and with the word Mujaddid, he used it as “Khatam Rabulalameen”.

Next the issue of death of Prophet Isa As and Mirza’s claims will be exposed, with analysis and expose of Mirza’s book “Jesus in India”. After the series on Mirza’s lies on the death of Isa As are exposed, the focus will be back on the issue of Mirza’s lies on different kind of Prophethoods, his claims in this regard and the issue of his call.

All rights reserved © 2010

Recitation of Kalima

Preface

Qadianis especially Lahori Qadianis always use this excuse that they recites Kalima and perform prayers, therefore, Muslims should not consider and declare them as non-Muslims.

This excuse is not based on honesty; it is based rather on mischief, a hallmark of Qadianis. In this article we will expose their dishonesty and prove that they are not Muslims by any stretch of the imaginations. Muslims have rightly declared them as non-Muslims and out side the pale of Islam.

Instead of re-producing the evidence already displayed in our previous articles, which is valid and relevant for this article, we will explain why the recitation of Kalima or offering the prayers is not enough to be a Muslim. These are two important articles of faith, no doubt, but these articles of faith in themselves not enough for some one to be a Muslim. To be a Muslim one has to follow other articles of faith, not accepting one article, or purposefully distorting or altering one of the article render one as non-Muslim.

We have divided this expose’ in two segments, the first segment dealt in this article, it deals with the evidence from the Holy Quran that recitation of Kalama is not enough to be a Muslim. In this segment another lie of Lahori Qadiani’s, to claim that Mirza never claimed prophet hood, is exposed from undeniable internal evidence, together with another claim “73^rd and only saved sect”.

Second segment deals with the issue of finality of Prophet Hood on Prophet SAW, this segment will be dealt separately in another article. This is the thorny issue for the Qadianis, and one of the main reasons the Muslims declare them non-Muslims. We will tackle the second segment in completely different way then done by other writers and commentators.

As a matter of fact, even though the second issue always grab the headlines, but apart from this issue, there is plenty in the writings of Mirza which renders him as non-believer i.e. Kafir.

 Articles of Faith

Recently, on forums, we engaged in discussion on different topics with an official of Lahori Qadianis. This interaction started almost two years ago, after the publications of our first article on our Web log.

During our first encounter with the so called Scholar of Lahori cult, he boldly tried to put the following suggestions to us instead of discussing the main thrust of the first article, Mirza’s use of the verses from Surah Al-Jin, that “he is given the knowledge of the Unseen” by Allah SWT, like the true Prophets, according to his claims.

Scholar’s invitations

In his response to our invitation to discuss and debate the main topic of the article, the alleged Scholar in September 2008 wrote:

 September 4^th, 2008 at 5:45 pm

Other topics could be:

1. Was Hazrat Mizra sahib a Muslim according to Islam?

2. Did he do any service to Islam or none whatsoever?

3. Are members of the AAIIL Muslims according to Islam?

4. Has AAIIL done any service to Islam or none?

As on his blog on the first page he writes that we falsely claim that Iqbal was sympathetic to our Movement, let us make that a topic. In fact, just that topic might suffice because he regards Iqbal as a great authority on Islam.

Mr Crank… could also get us a promise from the anti-Ahmadiyya ulama that if I prevail in these debates, they will campaign publicly to have Ahmadis declared as Muslim in Pakistan.

We subsequently tried to engage the Scholar in a discussion and debate on these topics; but he is quite reluctant to engage in very topics he so proudly wanted to discuss back in 2008. Recently, he did engage briefly, but that’s another story.

Conditions set by the Scholar and AAIIL

In 2001 a user belonging to the mainstream Qadiani faction asked the Scholar following questions:

  “You still not get my point, you recite Kalima but reject prophet of Allah (swt) what kind of Muslim is this now??
Allah (swt) says in Quran to accept my prophet who rejects them is a kafir, why Allah (swt) didnt say ONLY kalima is enuff, you dont anything else!!!!
Can I reject all prophets of allah and recite kalima, am I still muslim?? as muslim belive is to belive in all prophets!!, btw the kalima thing is in Hadith and not Holy Quran, dont mean I dont belive in this, BUT only saying Kalima and then rejecting a prophet of Allah(swt), playin with Islam or what??”

In a nutshell, what the mainstream Qadiani follower of Mirza was trying to ask is that the Lahori’s can not be Muslims by rejecting the claims of Prophet Hood of Mirza. He clearly stated his position that recitation of the Kalima is not the only requirement.

 To his questions the Scholar responded;

 Posts: 789

(11/30/01 10:03:19)

Could you then tell us what in addition to the Kalima a person has to believe or do in order to be a Muslim?

Secondly, if someone recites the Kalima, accepts everything in the Quran, says that he accepts every prophet who is in the Quran (e.g. Ibrahim, Musa, Isa, etc.), he believes in Allah, angels, Allah’s books, and the last day, he prays, fasts, gives zakat, goes for the hajj, then please tell us: would you regard him as a Muslim or not? If not, what extra do you want him to believe or do?

 Therefore, we have absolute proofs what the Lahori’s Scholar thinks and what he is written are the conditions to be a Muslim, according to him.

 AAIIL official position:

 1- Writings of Muhammad Ali

 A book “The Ahmadiyya Doctrine” was written by Muhammad Ali in 1932. He is considered to be a stalwart by the Lahori’s, it is useful to quote what he has written on this subject; only the relevant passages from the book are quoted.

 Muhammad Ali writes;

 “The Ahmadis are called kafir by some fanatical Mullahs. To remove all misunderstanding on this point I give below a summary of the beliefs we hold and leave it to the reader to see for himself whether a person holding these beliefs is a Muslim or a kafir (non-Muslim).”

Two categorical statements are produced first by the alleged Scholar and second from Muhammad Ali.  Sher Muhammad writings are also included in later part of this article. Their statements and the writings of Mirza will be analysed in the light of the teachings of the Holy Quran and off course from the internal evidence from their resources to expose their deceptions.

After judging Mirza’s writings with the teachings of the Holy Quran, we will pose the questions in the light of the evidence displayed in line with the conditions set by these three writers of Lahori Qadianis. Even though their writings are addressed in this article, but it holds true for other groups and other factions of the Qadianis.

Muhammad Ali then written their beliefs, once again the relevant information is displayed.

 1-    We believe in the absolute unity of God. La ilaha illallah (there is no God but Allah) is the first doctrine of our faith.

2-    We believe in the prophethood and apostleship of Hazrat Muhammad, may peace and the blessings of God be upon him. Muhammad-ur-Rasul-ullah is the second doctrine of our faith.

 3- The third doctrine listed by Muhammad Ali is their belief in the finality of Prophet Hood on Prophet SAW, which will be subject of a separate article. In our first article this topic was discussed as the claim of Prophet Hood by Mirza. Lahoris deny that Mirza ever made this claim. But unfortunately Lahoris have not produced any intelligent or reasonable argument to substantiate their positions on the claim of Prophet Hood by Mirza.

 4-We believe that the Holy Quran is the Word of God and that it is the final Law revealed for the guidance of humanity so that no law shall be revealed after it.

 5- We believe that every word of the Holy Quran shall remain in force till the day of the judgment and that not a word contained in the Holy Quran has been or shall ever be, abrogated.

6- We believe in all the prophets of God whose names are mentioned in the Holy Quran and also in the fact that there is no nation in which a prophet was not raised.

7- We believe in the books revealed by God to His Prophets in different ages and among various nations.

8- We believe in angels.

Muhammad Ali wrote 10 Beliefs we have listed 7 above, in this article we will leave out point 3 and 5, which would be discussed, in separate articles in the future, God willing. 

The purpose of this exhaustive exercise is to produce evidence, which is irrefutable; this evidence can be used to judge their claims.

 By following Mirza, his writings and his teachings, if they failed to adopt these conditions according to the teachings of the Holy Quran then their own evidence counts against them.

 2- Writings of Mirza

In response to hypothetical questions posed by the Lahori Qadianis that Muslims consider Qadianis as Kaffirs. In the answer a quote from Mirza’s book “Ayyam Sulh” is produced,

“We believe in the five pillars of Islam … We believe that there is no god besides God, and that Muhammad is His Messenger and the last of the prophets. We believe that whoever adds to, or detracts from, the Islamic Shari’ah even one whit, is excluded from Islam. And we instruct our community that they believe in laa ilaaha ill-Allah Muhammadur rasul Allah; and they consider as their duties salaat [prayer], saum [fasting], zakaat [charity], hajj [pilgrimage], and other obligations imposed by God and His Prophet, and act according to Islam. It is incumbent to believe in all those things which, according to the ijmaa’ [unanimity] of the Ahl-Sunnah (i.e., the orthodox), constitute Islam” (Ayyam Sulh).

Therefore, we have a full set of quotes from different Qadianis including Mirza. We proceed to anlayse and expose Mirza and his followers in the light of their own writings. There is no better way to prove one’s guilt in his words and deeds.

Exploring Quranic Evidence

1- Nature of Man: ever-true faith, Islam

In the Holy Quran, Allah SWT has decreed in very clear terms, the true nature of human and purpose of their creation, true faith of human, i.e. Islam, one and only true faith acceptable to Allah SWT, because the nature of human is set on this faith. Hence Muslim’s belief that every human is born as a Muslim and takes the faith of his parents due to the social conditions.

 30:30 AND SO, set thy face steadfastly towards the [one ever-true] faith, turning away from all that is false, in accordance with the natural disposition which God has instilled into man: [for,] not to allow any change to corrupt what God has thus created this is the [purpose of the one] ever-true faith; but most people know it not.

 2- Islamic faith

22:78And strive hard in God’s cause with all the striving that is due to Him: it is He who has elected you [to carry His message], and has laid no hardship on you in [anything that pertains to religion, [and made you follow] the creed of your forefather Abraham. It is He who has named you in bygone times as well as in this [divine writ] – “those who have surrendered themselves to God”, so that the Apostle might bear witness to the truth before you, and that you might bear witness to it before all mankind. Thus, be constant in prayer, and render the purifying dues, and hold fast unto God. He is your Lord Supreme: and how excellent is this Lord Supreme, and how excellent this Giver of Succour!

 The hardship in the religion of Islam is absence due to many factors;

 (1)   It is free of any dogma or mystical proposition which might make the Quranic doctrine difficult to understand or might even conflict with man’s innate nature described in the above verse. Even though Holy Quran decreed that Islam is free of dogma and stigmatism, Mirza in the condition of Prophet Hood after Prophet Muhammad SAW, said that it is not possible for any nominal Muslim to become a Prophet. This evidence is displayed in our first article.

 (2)   Islam avoids all complicated ritual or system of taboos, which would impose undue restrictions on man’s everyday life; but Mirza still followed rituals like throwing beans in the well and ordering his followers not to look back.

 (3) Islam rejects all self-mortification it forbids suicide, a hint for the followers of Mirza who keeps bringing political issues more frequently at present due to the geopolitical situation around the World. It rejects exaggerated asceticism, which must unavoidably conflict with mans true nature described in this verse. 

Abraham is designated as “our forefather” not only because he was, in fact, an ancestor of the prophet Muhammad SAW, to whom we the Muslims follow, but also because he is a model and thus, the spiritual “forefather” of all the Muslims; who consciously “surrender themselves to God”.

The term Muslim signifies “one who surrenders himself to God”; correspondingly, Islam means “self-surrender to God”. Both of these terms are applied in the Qur’an to all those who believe in One God and affirm this belief by an unequivocal acceptance of His revealed messages. Therefore, it is not we the Muslims but all the followers of earlier Prophets whoever fulfilled these conditions and surrendered their selves to the One True God. It is obligatory for the Muslims to accept all the earlier true Prophets of God and the revelations vouchsafed to them. Without this fundamental condition, no one can claim to be a Muslim.

Mirza due to his jealousy to Prophet Isa As, and in his desires to compete with him As; and for him to be accepted as “ Promised Messiah” violated this command of the Holy Quran, by hurling false accusations against Isa As and his As family. We have covered this with evidence in our earlier article, but relevant points would be included briefly in this article.

3- Islamic Articles of faith

For the followers of Mirza to suggest and claim that because they recite Kalima therefore, they automatically qualify as Muslims, their claims are ill founded. Quran is full of verses on the conduct of the hypocrites and repeatedly decreed that they are destined to the hellfire.

At the time of Prophet Muhammad SAW and during the period of Quranic revelations, these hypocrites recited the Kalama, but Allah SWT repeatedly rejected their claims of being Muslims only on the basis of them reciting the Kalima. We will not dwell too much on the subject of hypocrites; there is plenty of evidence in the writings of Mirza, which is enough proof of his kuffar. Nevertheless, the point that the hypocrites were not accepted as Muslims in the Holy Quran is relevant to prove that the recitation of Kalima on its own is not enough to be a Muslim.

 A – Hypocrites were not Muslims

9:74[The hypocrites] swear by God that they have said nothing [wrong]; yet most certainly have they uttered a saying which amounts to a denial of the truth, and have [thus] denied the truth after [having professed] their self-surrender to God: for they were aiming at something which was beyond their reach. And they could find no fault [with the Faith] save that God had enriched them and [caused] His Apostle [to enrich them] out of His bounty! Hence, if they repent, it will be for their own good. But if they turn away, God will cause them to suffer grievous suffering in this world and in the life to come, and they will find no helper on earth, and none to give [them] succour.

This verse is damning evidence against the lies and claims of Qadianis in general and lies of the Lahori Qadianis in particular.

In this verse no ambiguity is left it is a clear demonstration that in Islam recitation of Kalima is not the only requirement to be Muslims. This verse says, they utter denials and kuffar (Kalimatul kuffar), they have became Kaffirs after accepting Islam (Ba’ad Islamahum), and if they repent not, i.e. became Muslims again by rejecting the kuffar they are uttering, and correcting their beliefs and deeds, then grievous suffering awaits them.

 B- List of Articles of faith

The Shahada itself is not the only Article of faith for Muslims, but it is one of many, we have to follow all the articles of faith to be considered and remain Muslims.

 1-    Believe in God, in oneness of God i.e. Tauheed

2-    Believe in the revelations from God, i.e. Quran and earlier revelations in their true form, which unfortunately does not exist anymore due to the corruption of the scriptures.

3-    Believe in the Angels of God Believe in Prophets of God; all the True Prophets of God, not a selection based on your personal choice or rejection based on your personal animosity.

4-    Believe in resurrection day; with all its implications.

5-    Believe in Divine Decree

 C – Description of Shahada (disambiguation)

Shahda in itself is a comprehensive issue, and not simply constitute recitation of the Kalima. Its closest translation in English is disambiguation, i.e. to be clear of any ambiguity, in recognizing and proclaiming we the Muslims follow one true God.

• Al-`Ilm: Knowledge of the meaning of the Shahadah, its negation and affirmation. Negating there is no other deity worthy of the worship but Allah SWT, affirming that we surrender only to Allah SWT.
• Al-Yaqeen: Certainty – perfect knowledge of it that counteracts suspicion and doubt. To have certainty in our beliefs that Allah SWT has the perfect knowledge of what exists in the universe, nothing escapes His SWT’s unfathomable knowledge. And only He SWT is worthy of our worship.
• Al-Ikhlaas: Sincerity which negates shirk. Sincerity with the unity of Allah SWT, Who is above the need of having any partners, He SWT Begets not nor He SWT is Begotten. He SWT is beyond the need to call someone son, even as a figure of speech (claimed by Mirza).
• Al-Sidq: Truthfulness that permits neither falsehood nor hypocrisy.
• Al-Mahabbah: Love of the Shahadah and its meaning, and being happy with it.
• Al-Inqiad: Submission to its rightful requirements, which are the duties that must be performed with sincerity to God (alone) seeking His pleasure.
• Al-Qubool: Acceptance that contradicts rejection.

The second part of the Shahada carries several conditions as well:

• To believe in the Prophet SAW and in whatever he said and conveyed in his message as the seal of the prophets.
• To obey him in whatever he commanded.
• To stay away from or avoid whatever he commanded Muslims not to do.
• To follow or emulate him in our ‘ibadah (worship), akhlaq (manners), and way of life.
• To love him more than you love yourself, your family and anything else in this world.
• To understand, practice, and promote his Sunnah in the best way possible, without creating any chaos, enmity or harm. (source Wiki)

D – Islamic Articles of faith: Quranic evidence

First the description of articles of faith in the Holy Quran;

2:285 THE APOSTLE, and the believers with him, believe in what has been bestowed upon him from on high by his Sustainer: they all believe in God, and His angels, and His revelations, and His apostles, making no distinction between any of His apostles; and they say: We have heard, and we pay heed. Grant us Thy forgiveness, O our Sustainer, for with Thee is all journeys’ end!

We the Muslims make no distinction between any of His SWT apostles these words are put, as it were, in the mouths of the believers. Inasmuch as all the apostles were true bearers of God’s messages, there is no distinction between them, albeit some of them have been “endowed more highly than others”. But nonetheless, they all were the true bearers of God’s messages.

Quran is continuity and culmination of the revelations;

2:4 And who believe in that which has been bestowed from on high upon thee, [O Prophet,] as well as in that which was bestowed before thy time: for it is they who in their innermost are certain of the life to come!

This verse is reference to one of the fundamental doctrines of the Holy Quran. The doctrine of continuity of divine revelations; vouchsafed to earlier Prophets and culminated in the Quranic revelations. Life, especially the spiritual life, Qur’an teaches us, is not a series of unconnected jumps but a continuous, organic process, to which man’s religious experience (in its cumulative sense) is a part. Thus Islam, the religion of the Qur’an can be properly understood only against this background, of the great monotheistic faiths. Even though these faiths claimed to be different by their followers, but according to the Holy Quran, all the Prophets of Allah SWT were adherent to one and only religion Islam, acceptable to Allah SWT, Islam, self surrender to Allah SWT. According to Muslim belief, Quranic revelations culminate and achieve final formulation of the faith of Islam.

D- Articles of faith: Evidence from Ahadiths

The first Hadith in the first book of Muslim deals with the issue of Articles of faith. That hadith is quite lengthy but there is another hadith in the same book, which is slightly shorter, it still too lengthy to quote in full for the purpose of this article. Therefore, we are only quoting appropriate portion from it.

Muslim; Book 001, Number 0004:

Abu Huraira reported: One day the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) appeared before the public that a man came to him and said: Prophet of Allah, (tell me) what is Iman. Upon this he (the Holy Prophet) replied: That you affirm your faith in Allah, His angels, His Books, His meeting, His Messengers and that you affirm your faith in the Resurrection hereafter. He (again) said: Messenger of Allah, (tell me) what does al-Islam signify. He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Al-Islam signifies that you worship Allah and do not associate anything with Him and you establish obligatory prayer and you pay the obligatory poor-rate (Zakat) and you observe the fast of Ramadan.

The remaining part of the Hadith deals with the topic of Day of Judgment and its signs. It may be useful in a future article on this issue.

Are Qadianis 73rd and saved sect?

It provides us opportunity to expose another claim of Qadianis. They claimed that they are the 73^rd and the only saved sect in Islam. Beside the fundamental question of them to be Muslims first and foremost, their claim is false, like many other claims, it is proven from the Holy Quran.

1- Mirza created a new Sect in Islam

Their claims are based on heresies of Mirza. Mirza in Arbaeen after stating that he was named Ibrahim in Braheen writes:

 “In every respect follow his (Mirza’s) example, as it is written in the Verse “ Wa Mubashara Bir Rasool yati min baadi asma Ahmed” (V 7 Surah Al saf) that Prophet Muhammad SAW will appear in the last days (Mirza as a Barooz). Meaning it will be a hand of his (SAW) whose name in the heaven is Ahmed he will spread the religion, in the guise of Messih. Similar is the verse ‘Wa Attakhozu Men Maghame Ibrahim Masla‘. It contains a hint that at a time when the Ummah of Muhammad (SAW) will become divided into many groups, then during the last era an Ibrahim (Mirza) will be born and out of all the groups that group will be saved which follows this Ibrahim.”

 (Arbain V3 P 32, RK 17:57 P421)

 Mirza killed many birds with one stone in this quotation.

 1-    He became the real Ahmed, instead of Ghulam of Ahmed. Who to argue with him if Allah SWT names him as Ahmed in the heavens? (A separate article on this very topic is in the pipeline).

2-    He also became a Burooz of Prophet Isa AS as Messiah (again this topic needs full attention in a new article).

3-    He also became Prophet Ibrahim too, because he was named as such in Braheen. Is Braheen a divine book? What if there are errors in Braheen? Will Qadianis accept that these mistakes are committed by Allah SWT (nauzobillah)?

4-    Last but not least he became a Burooz of Prophet SAW.

 2- Muhammad Ali on Sects

 Before we examine Mirza’s claims from the Holy Quran, it is useful to look at the comments of Muhammad Ali in his article in point

3 of “what is sectarianism”, he writes;

“Some people, by neglecting the distinction between sectarianism and difference of opinion, regard all differences of opinion as an attempt at creating disharmony and discord in Islam. The Quran says:

As for those who split up their religion and became sects, thou hast no concern with them (6:160).

The meaning of splitting up the unity of religion and becoming divided into sects is obvious, but some people have a wrong understanding of this verse. It does not and could not mean that Muslims should not differ with one another in any respect. It was, however, not surprising to find differences of opinion in a nation that was spread all over the world. The Holy Prophet had declared difference of opinion to be a mercy for his ummah, which shows that in difference is also hidden the secret of the progress of the ummah.”

The hypocrisy of Muhammad Ali is quote apparent, it is obvious from above quote he knew that the Holy Quran forbid creation of sects in the religion of Islam, but he ignored the writings of Mirza on this crucial issue, purposefully. He being the “Scholar” of this cult ought to have known the evidence displayed above, which surely he did, and its implications on anyone who divide the religion in to sects. We find further proofs in the writings of Sher Muhammad that the elders of Lahori’s indeed were aware of Mirza’s writings.

3- Quranic Evidence: Creation of Sects is forbidden

We quote two verses from Surah An’am; first verse is relevant for the topic under discussion, and the second proves the Qadiani’s claims wrong of being the 73^rd and saved sect.

6:158 Do they, perchance, wait for the angels to appear unto them, or for thy Sustainer [Himself] to appear, or for some of thy Sustainers’ [final] portents to appear? [But] on the Day when thy Sustainers’ [final] portents do appear, believing will be of no avail to any human being who did not believe before, or who, while believing, did no good works. Say: “Wait, [then, for the Last Day, O unbelievers:] behold, we [believers] are waiting, too!”

A fundamental fact has appeared in the above verse; on the Day of the Judgment even the believers, who did not do the good works would be treated exactly like un-believers. Those believers must have recited Kalima to become believers, but that would be no avail to them, unless they have performed good deeds too.

As a side note, Mirza claim Allah SWT did appeared to him in the shape of a man (Tamseel) and even to another person to testify the truthfulness of Mirza. This evidence is displayed in our earlier articles.

In the quotation above, Mirza claimed he received the revelations that his sect would be the saved sect. There is no better barometer then the Holy Quran to judge Mirza’s truthfulness.

6:159 VERILY, as for those who have broken the unity of their faith and have become sects – thou hast nothing to do with them. Behold, their case rests with God: and in time He will make them understand what they were doing.

According to the commentators this is a reference primarily, to the Jews and the Christians, who have departed from the fundamental religious principles of Islam, remember, all the Prophets of Allah SWT only taught religion of Islam to their followers. They originally shared the same religion but with passage of time have gone different ways in respect of doctrine and ethics.

Beside this “primary” reference, this verse expresses a condemnation of all sectarianism arising out of people’s intolerant, mutually exclusive claims to being “the only true exponents” of the Quranic teachings.

Thus, when asked about the implications of this verse, the Prophet’s Companion Abu Hurayrah is reported to have answered, “It has been revealed with reference to this [our] community” (Tabari).

This verse connects logically with verse 153 of the Surah.

6:153And [know] that this is the way leading straight unto Me: follow it, then, and follow not other ways, lest they cause you to deviate from His way. [All] this has He enjoined upon you, so that you might remain conscious of Him.

There are no ambiguities in these verses “Firqawa” meaning they became sects, implying the condition of the followers of earlier Prophets. And “Fa’tafraqa” is used in 6:153 giving a warning to the Muslims not to become sects and repeat the errors of the earlier communities. Thus, unity of the faith of Islam, rejecting the practice of sects and splitting of the community leading straight to Allah SWT, this indeed is the right path.

21:92 VERILY, [O you who believe in Me,] this community of yours is one single community, since I am the Sustainer of you all: worship, then, Me [alone]!

The verse 6:159 is addressing Prophet SAW and his SAW followers in general; even he SAW has nothing to do with the people who break the unity of their faith by becoming sects, either the followers of earlier Prophets and revelations or the Muslims followers of the Holy Quran and Prophet Muhammad SAW. Muslims should consider this fact, when Prophet Muhammad SAW has no say in it, but those who split up the religion of Islam in to sects their affair is with Allah SWT and Him SWT alone. Then it does not matter who started the sects in Islam, they are responsible to Allah SWT on the day of the Judgment.

It proves yet another lie of Mirza, exposed by direct evidence from the Holy Quran. There should be absolutely no doubt Mirza was a liar, he never received any revelations. His claims to be called Ibrahim or Burooz of Isa As or Prophet Muhammad SAW are bogus; without any merits, Quranic evidence is against his claims. We will expose his other claims in our future articles.

Quran, uses the term sects for the followers of earlier scriptures, hence the decree that Islam is the only religion acceptable to Allah SWT, preached by all the earlier Prophets too. It only culminated and completed through Quranic revelations.

19:37And yet, the sects [that follow the Bible] are at variance among themselves [about the nature of Jesus Woe, then, unto all who deny the truth when that awesome Day will appear!

This verse is quite useful to expose other lies of Mirza, which indeed would be exposed in future articles, Inshallah.

Distortion of truth and falsehood is forbidden

4:135O YOU who have attained to faith! Be ever steadfast in upholding equity, bearing witness to the truth for the sake of God, even though it be against your own selves or your parents and kinsfolk. Whether the person concerned be rich or poor, God's claim takes precedence over [the claims of] either of them. Do not, then, follow your own desires, lest you swerve from justice: for if you distort [the truth], behold, God is indeed aware of all that you do!

Considering the amount of lies written by Mirza throughout his life, some of his lies presented in our earlier articles. It is not difficult to comprehend in the light of the Quranic teachings how Allah SWT will treat Mirza on the day of the Judgment.

2:136 “We Believe in God, and in that which has been bestowed from on high upon us, and that which has been bestowed upon Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and their descendants, and that which has been vouchsafed to Moses and Jesus; and that which has been vouchsafed to all the [other] Prophets by their Sustainer: we make no distinction between any of them. And it is unto Him that we surrender ourselves.”

 1-     First condition, we believe in God. Mirza did not believe in God. He persistently lied and attributed white lies to Allah SWT, regularly through out his life. Plenty of evidence was displayed in our previous articles.

 2-     Second Condition, to believe in the revelations bestowed on the true Prophets of Allah SWT, forget about revelations received by other Prophets he even lied about the Quranic evidence and attributed white lies to the Holy Quran. Once again evidence can be found in our previous articles.

 3-     Third condition, no distinction between any of the Prophets. Mirza attacked Prophet Isa As of the Holy Quran. All his life, he attributed lies to Prophet Isa As, he associated lies to the verses of the Holy Quran to belittle and curse a mighty Prophet of Allah SWT.

 4-     Only by adhering to all these conditions one becomes a Muslim, as the last part of this verse declares “We make no distinctions amongst any of the Messenger of Allah SWT; we are the Muslims, we surrender ourselves to Allah SWT.”

 5-    Not accepting one Messenger of Allah SWT renders one out of the pale of Islam, without shadow of any doubts.

Ironically, Qadianis do not realise that the excuse they use against the Muslims is already taken care of by All Knowing Allah SWT in the Holy Quran.

There are other indications in the Holy Quran that belief in all the Prophets is part of our Iman and accepting all the Messengers of Allah SWT mentioned by name in the Holy Quran is obligatory for the Momins.

2:177 True piety does not consist in turning your faces towards the east or the west  – but truly pious is he who believes in God, and the Last Day; and the angels, and revelation and the prophets; and spends his substance – however much he himself may cherish – it – upon his near of kin, and the orphans, and the needy, and the wayfarer, and the beggars, and for the freeing of human beings from bondage; and is constant in prayer, and renders the purifying dues; and [truly pious are] they who keep their promises whenever they promise, and are patient in misfortune and hardship and in time of peril: it is they that have proved themselves true, and it is they, they who are conscious of God.

 Asad explains

 In this context, the term “revelation” (al-kitab) carries, according to most of the commentators, a generic significance: it refers to the fact of divine revelation as such. As regards belief in angels, it is postulated here because it is through these spiritual beings or force’s (belonging to the realm of al-ghayb, i.e., the reality which is beyond the reach of human perception) that God reveals His will to the prophets and, thus, to mankind at large.

Allah SWT decreed that true piety is not turning your face towards east or west, i.e. performing prayers, but true pious is one who follows the commands contained in above verse.

 Mirza failed the tests set in the above verse on the following grounds;

 1-    He attacked Prophet Isa As of the Holy Quran therefore he is denier of the Prophets.

 2-    He tried to abolish starving in the cause of Allah, a Quranic decree therefore he is denier of the “Al-Kitab, i.e. Quranic revelations.

 3-    There are indications that in his life he did not give Zakat regularly, he surely practically replaced the Zakat with different chanda’s for the benefit of his family, ignoring the commands of Allah SWT in the Holy Quran.

4-    He also regularly committed acts of Shirk in his life. To hide his shirk he lied about the verses of the Holy Quran. He claimed that Jews were allowed to call themselves Sons of God in the Holy Quran. He also wrote that Prophet SAW was allowed to call the followers his (SAW) “aba’di”. Once again a blatant lie against Holy Quran, the Word of Allah SWT. Evidence was produced in a previous article.

Mirza disqualified being a Muslim by attacking Prophet Isa As, by lying about the revelations in the Holy Quran, he simply cannot be a Muslim let alone a Prophet of any kind or descriptions. Many other examples and reasons were given in our previous articles to prove that he is not remotely Muslim. Preponderance of evidence is against him. To put it simply he is just not credible as a person, due to his lies.

 Mirza a Muslim?

We move on to other evidence from the writings of Mirza to prove that he cannot be a Muslim some of this evidence is from our earlier articles. It is re-produced here because it is vitally important to the issues dealt in this article.

Our strategy was and is to include in each article little material to show the thinking of Mirza, which is completely against the Quranic and Islamic teachings. To gradually build up the case against Mirza that he is not credible, reliable or scholarly sound character, even if we leave the theological aspect on one side. An analysis of his writings point by point is done to pose the questions can he be a Muslim?

 1- Mirza didn’t believe in Unity of Allah SWT

 First a look at the evidence, did Mirza believed the first article of faith, la ilaha ilalllah, there is but One God.

The Islamic concept of One God not only limited to proclaiming that He SWT is One God, but practically adopting this concept as a practice in our lives. To believe and practice that certain characteristics are of God’s Domain only and the creature cannot under any circumstances claim any share of His SWT Divine Powers.

 A-   To hide his Shirk where he claimed that he has been called Son by Allah SWT, on Page 105 in Kitab al-bariya, Mirza written that Prophet Muhammad SAW was allowed to call his followers his “abadi” creation by quoting the Holy Quran. We have already produced Quranic evidence (HQ 39:53) that Mirza blatantly lied; in the verse Allah SWT is addressing believers and not Prophet SAW.

B-   On the same page, Mirza gave different reasons to the Christians, comparing himself with Jesus As. Mirza argued that he received these revelations from Allah SWT, in which he says he created heavens and earth. He also claimed that his condition moved from Kashaf to Ilham and he started to recount, “I wished and created Adam, I created man”. Mirza using his canned logic argued that the powers given to him in his ilhams are far superior to that given to Jesus As therefore his own “divinity” is proven better than “Jesus As”.

 Mirza has copied his ilham from the verse 67:5

67:5 And, indeed, We have adorned the skies nearest to the earth with lights, and have made them the object of futile guesses for the evil ones [from among men]: and for them have We readied suffering through a blazing flame –

Very clearly, Mirza Kazzab has changed the verse of the Holy Quran and became the creator by placing “Ana” in front of “zeena” in the above verse. Therefore, instead of Allah SWT in the Holy Quran, Mirza became the god and creator (nauzobillah).

Another verse in the Holy Quran had the word “Ina” for Allah SWT, Mirza just mixed the two verses, and claimed divinity for himself.

37:6 We have indeed decked the lower heaven with beauty (in) the stars,-

C- Qadianis especially Lahoris make excuses and provide weird reasoning by digging up in the books of others who have made similar claims. But they purposefully ignore the lies of Mirza, lies he attributed to the Holy Quran that Prophet Muhammad SAW was allowed to call his followers as “Abadi”. (Evidence in the article “Attack on ISA As”) also at the end of above page.

D-   Evidence from Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi Page 267 was presented in the same article, in which Mirza claimed to have written the fate or future, and after writing “Taqdeer” he presented it to Allah SWT for signature. Mirza claimed he saw Allah SWT in Tamseel as a “human”.

E-    Mirza In Haqeeqatul Wahi wrote another incredible piece, this evidence from Tadkirah is produced with English translation.

This blasphemous piece is claimed to be a revelation from Allah SWT, copied directly from the Holy Quran and slightly changed by Mirza to claim divinity yet again. Similarly fashion to the evidence displayed above.

6:82 His Being alone is such that when He wills a thing to be, He but says unto it, “Be” — and it is.

 Mirza just made slight changes to it; for example he changed “amara” to “amraka” and “arada” to “aradat” in the alleged revelations and as a consequence “yaqool” has become “Taqool”.

It is quite evident that this Charlatan was playing with the Word of God, with the revelations received by Prophet Muhammad SAW. He was showing his true colours by writing the most heinous blasphemy imaginable to any Muslim, by declaring that he has been given the creative powers by God, exactly the powers which are only ascribed to Allah SWT, the All-Knowing and All-Powerful.

 Asad explains this Majestic domain of the Creator in these words, “This is the meaning of the phrase innama amruhu – the term amr being synonymous, in this instance, with shan (“state [or "manner"] of being”). The exclusiveness of God’s creative Being is stressed by the restrictive particle innama.

These kinds of ilhams cannot be from Allah SWT but from the accursed.

 Mirza writes in ZTG P20

“Secondly; Khuda Talla appeared to him in Tamseel (in Human Form); said to him, Mirza Ghulam Ahmed is truthful (Haq) or on right path. Then why people deny him (do not believe him)?”

Mirza is claiming that Allah SWT appeared in human form to confirm that Mirza is truthful. A Muslim can never make such a claim, it is strictly forbidden in Islam. We have already showed the evidence in our previous article, what the agenda of Mirza was and whose dirty work he was carrying out. This kind of evidence put to rest Mirza’s claims and of his followers that he was a Champion of Islam. He is doing the bidding of his opponents rather then defending Islam with such heresies. All of these ideas of human having the creative powers; being Son or Sons of God, seeing God face to face, God visiting the earth in human form are Judo Christians distorted teachings. They have nothing to do with the Holy Quran and Islamic teachings.

Quranic Evidence against Mirza’s lies

Even though the Qadianis desperately try to justify the shirk of Mirza by insisting that the whole purpose of Mirza was to show to the Christians that there is one amongst the Muslims (not that he was a Muslim) who has given this honour too by Allah SWT.

This is canned logic; there should be absolutely no doubt in anyone’s mind that these revelations could not have come from Allah SWT, but indeed were the lies of Mirza and inspiration if there were any, which we doubt very much, they were from Iblis the accursed.

We find that Allah SWT in the Holy Quran very categorically denied any such ideas. Even to think such ideas is a heresy in Islam.

19:88 As it is, some assert, “The Most Gracious has taken unto Himself a son„!.

This verse is alluding to the Christians beliefs, they claiming Jesus As is “the son of God”. And in general to the beliefs of others, who believe in God’s “incarnations” on earth, where created being takes up the theme mentioned in the Verse 19:81;

19:81 For [such as] these have taken to worshipping deities other than God, hoping that they would be a

[/source]

strength for them.

The deification of powers to the beings other than Allah SWT with a view and belief that those beings could be source of strength, for those who turn towards them. This verse is referring to those who either deny Allah SWT or attribute powers to other deities.

The passage in 19:88 refers to those who, even though claiming to believe in God, still deify others. This deification is against the principle of Allah’s SWT transcendent nature; His SWT Oneness and Uniqueness. These deifications breach the bond between The Creator and the creation, and thus constitute an unforgivable and unpardonable sin.

Mirza used downright lies and shameful excuses that him being called a son by Allah SWT but only in metaphorical sense. Allah SWT in the Holy Quran rejects his excuses and lies, it is inconceivable. The idea that Allah SWT could have a son either real, or metaphorical, it would denote innate likeness to Allah SWT, but we know from the teachings of the Holy Quran that Allah SWT indeed is Unique and nothing could be compared to Him SWT(112:4) . We have already quoted this verse in our previous article.

Secondly, this preposterous idea of having a “progeny” in real or in imaginations or metaphorically, implies that there is an organic continuation of the being of Allah SWT, or part of Him SWT, in another being, thus, it shows a degree of incompleteness of Allah SWT. This inconceivable idea of incompleteness in any sense, negate the very concept of Allah SWT.

Even if this idea of “Son” is considered blasphemous in Islam, it amounts to an attempt to define Allah SWT, who is exalted and beyond anything men may devise to define Him SWT. This idea is described in 6:100 in the Holy Quran;

6:100 And yet, some [people] have come to attribute to all manner of invisible beings a place side by side with God – although it is He who has created them [all]; and in their ignorance they have invented for Him sons and daughters! Limitless is He is His glory, and sublimely exalted above anything that men may devise by way of definition:

A clear reference to the Pagan practice of calling Angels “daughters” of Allah SWT, the Most Gracious. Similarly it could be true for the Christians calling Jesus As “Son” of God and the practice by the Jews who also called themselves “Sons of God” even though they applied different meanings then the Christians, but indeed they had this practice too. It is inconceivable for men to devise the being of God in way of definition. 

 2- Mirza didn’t believe in Quranic revelations

Mirza never believed in Allah SWT, Prophet Muhammad SAW and in the Quranic evidence, some proofs of his lies against the Holy Quran were produced in our earlier articles. We produce few more  examples of his lies, to enhance our claims that he was in fact a non-believer. 

 A- Lie that all the Prophecies in the divine revelations are not fulfilled

Mirza wrote;” Allah SWT decreed in the Holy Quran (wrote v29 of Surah Al-Muminun, which is wrong) meaning if this Nabi is a Kazib then he would self-destruct, but if he is truthful, then some of his prophecies would be fulfilled. It is not being said (decreed) that all (the prophecies) would be fulfilled. Thus in this place (verse) it is clearly said (decreed) by Khuda (Allah SWT), it is not necessary that all the prophecies foretold would be fulfilled. Some may be postponed (or cancelled). If this was not the Will (Will of Allah SWT) then Khuda Talla (Allah SWT) would have said, (Arabic quotations translated as) “he is truthful, all his prophecies are fulfilled”, but it is not been said (decreed).”

In previous article “Mirza a false Prophet” we have produced evidence on Mirza claims that he is addressee of the Quranic verse and if he associated a lie to Allah SWT Allah SWT would have severed his jugular veins. Here he is paddling the same lies, and also his lies that the Will of Allah SWT is not fulfilled all the times, this evidence from HW is produced below in this article.

 We turn to the Holy Quran to judge truthfulness of Mirza;

40:28 At that, a believing man of Pharaoh’s family, who [until then] had concealed his faith, exclaimed: “Would you slay a man because he says, ‘God is my Sustainer’ – seeing, withal, that he has brought you all evidence of this truth from your Sustainer? Now if he be a liar, his lie will fall back on him; but if he is a man of truth, something [of the punishment] whereof he warns you is bound to befall you: for, verily, God would not grace with His guidance one who has wasted his own self by lying [about Him].

Firstly, Mirza misquoted the name of the Surah; this verse is from Surah Ghafir and not from Surah Muminun.

Secondly, Mirza is up to his dirty tricks, this is not a direct decree of Allah SWT but it is from the story of Moses, where a Mumin, who concealed his faith due to persecution, spoke to the Pharaoh and to the gathered crowd.

Thirdly, Mirza wrote in “Correction of a Mistake” that he was given the knowledge of the unseen.

We waited long enough but no one amongst the Qadianis has until now successfully defended Mirza on his use of Verses 26/27 from Surah Al-Jin. In the Holy Quran Allah SWT has relayed some brief stories of the past Prophets and generations. It is indeed true that Prophet SAW was unaware of the facts related to these stories. Some people erroneously think this constitutes knowledge of the unseen.

It is not strictly speaking knowledge of the Unseen, which is only with Allah SWT. Let us clarify our statement and what was written in our previous article. If we take above example, this incident happened in the court of Pharaoh; there were many witnesses to this incident. They had the knowledge of what happened and what was discussed. This knowledge was lost due to passage of time, but it was human knowledge after all, not the knowledge of the unseen.

An Egyptian, who was a believer but concealed his faith for fear of persecution, makes the above statement according to the decree in the Holy Quran. A point is made in this verse for a mighty Messenger of Allah SWT, that if he As was a liar, he would have wasted himself “Musrif”. The anonymous believer put his testimony and backing for Moses to argue that the message brought forward by Moses is so convincing, the message in itself is a proof that Moses is not wasting himself in a lie.

B- Prophet SAW received Persian ilhams ?

In Malfozat it is stated that “once Prophet SAW was asked, did he SAW ever received a Persian revelations from Allah SWT? He SAW responded, yes once one sentence was revealed (quotations of the actual revelations in Persian).

This lie is displayed in one of the articles on official Qadiani website, but the source of this absurd claim is Mirza.

There is no evidence of any such revelations received by Prophet SAW. This is height of Mirza’s lies and his shameful nature that he purported such lies without any fear of Allah SWT or shame on his own person. Only Mirza and his cronies can write such a lie without giving any reference whatsoever. Nevertheless, it demonstrates that Mirza was not a believer on Prophet Muhammad SAW or the Holy Quran and Allah SWT. Remember, this lies is against Allah SWT because Mirza said, Allah SWT revealed the Persian revelation to Prophet SAW. 

 3 – Mirza didn’t believe in the True Prophets

We have produce plenty of evidence of Mirza’s lies and heresies against Prophet Isa As, in which Mirza attack Prophet Isa As of the Holy Quran and not the imaginary Jesus of the Bible as he claimed.

We are producing few more examples of his lies and heresies against Prophet Isa As, this is not exhaustive list, but just few examples, otherwise Mirza’s lies and heresies both against Isa As and the Holy Quran are many.

 It is also not correct to say he only written against Isa As of the Holy Quran, because he has written many lies against the Holy Quran, which in effect shows his disrespect to Prophet Muhammad SAW, and against Allah SWT too. By virtue of attacking and lying about the revelations of the Holy Quran, Mirza has proven that he did not have beliefs on any Prophet of Allah SWT, not only Prophet Isa As.

 A quotation from Mirza.

HW Page 173 RK 22-80

In Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi Mirza writes, “the purpose of the verses in the Holy Quran is not that salvation can be achieved without beliefs on the Prophet(s). But to stress that the salvation cannot be achieved without having the beliefs on Unity of God and on the Judgment Day. The beliefs on Allah (SWT) can only be achieved by having beliefs on His Prophets”.

The first point to have beliefs in the Unity of Allah SWT is already exposed earlier; together with his lies against the Holy Quran now let’s turn to produce more evidence against his beliefs on Prophets of Allah SWT.

 In Kisthi Nooh Mirza writes;

Use of Alcohol has cause untold damage to (the health) of European people. The reason for this (use of Alcohol) damage is that Isa As was used to drink Alcohol, may be because of some ailment or he was a habitual drinker, but O’ Muslims, your Prophet AS (Muhammad SAW) was an innocent, without habit of using any substance. He (SAW) was innocent; whom do you follow by calling yourself Muslims? Unlike Bible, (Holy) Quran does not declare Alcohol Halal. Under what books (of revelations) do you declare Alcohol Halal? Why are you not mindful of death (and punishment in hereafter)?

Beautiful speech indeed from a liar, didn’t he declare using Alcohol inside the four walls of the resident as Halal? We have produced this evidence in our earlier article.

In this quotation Mirza has used “Isa As” a term only used by the Muslims, therefore, it is clear he is not addressing imaginary Jesus of the Bible. Also the context is quite clearly centered on Muslims; therefore there is no ambiguity in his subject matter and the addressee of Mirza in this quotation.

Not surprisingly he addressing the Muslims, mentioning the Holy Quran and using the Islamic name and salutation for Jesus As. But he is basing his attacks from the facts obtained either from the Bible or from Christian’s writings. Shamefully, now he has forgotten completely about that imaginary Jesus (as) he claimed he was attacking, now the lines are blurred, it is okay to attack a mighty Messengers of Allah SWT by using questionable and unreliable material.

There is no such description of Isa As in the Holy Quran.

 In his book Ayam-e-Saleh, Mirza writes;   (After quoting Quranic verse) Our Prophet SAW did not receive education from the teachers, but Isa As and Moses As attended (religious) Schools. Hazrat Isa (as) learned whole of the Torah from a Jewish teacher. Thus, in this respect, our Prophet SAW was not taught by a teacher, and God was his SAW teacher. In the beginning, Allah SWT said to him “Iqra” read, not anyone else said it.” 

 What does Quranic evidence says in this regard?

 5:110 Lo! God will say: “O Jesus, son of Mary! Remember the blessings which I bestowed upon thee and thy mother-how I strengthened thee with holy inspiration, so that thou couldst speak unto men in thy cradle, and as a grown man; and how I imparted unto thee revelation and wisdom, including the torah and the Gospel; and how by My leave thou didst create out of clay, as it were, the shape of [thy followers'] destiny, and then didst breathe into it, so that it might become, by My leave, [their] destiny ; and how thou didst heal the blind and the leper by My leave, and how thou didst raise the dead by My leave; and how I prevented the children of Israel from harming thee when thou camest unto them with all evidence of the truth, and [when] those of them who were bent on denying the truth were saying, `This is clearly nothing but deception!”‘

This verse takes care of many lies purported by Mirza against Isa As. Firstly, it clearly says Allah SWT imparted unto Isa As the revelations and Wisdom including the Torah and the Gospel. There are many verses in the Holy Quran, which clearly say that Allah SWT taught Isa As the Torah.

3:48 and He will impart unto thy son revelation, and wisdom, and the torah, and the gospel,

Proof that this glad tiding was given to Mary the Mother of Jesus As before he As was born that God will impart unto him As the knowledge of the Torah.

There is another proof in the above verse, which we will explore in the future. The verse mentions that God will teach Jesus As, the Book; Asad translates this as revelations.

Asad used the term revelations because he is one of those Muslims who believe Jesus As has died. Thus his use of revelations for the word “Al-Kitab”. We do not agree with this translation, if from the word “Al-Kitab” this verse is pointing towards the revelations received by Prophet Jesus As, which in fact is described as “Injeel” in the Holy Quran. The mention of “Injeel” separately in this verse is indications that from “Al-Kitab” the verse is in fact relating to the Holy Quran, which is widely known as “Al-Kitab” by the Muslims, a belief directly derived from this phrase used in the Holy Quran.

By virtue of Mirza slating Prophet Isa As of the Holy Quran, Mirza has proven without shadow of any doubts that he did not have any belief in God, according to his own writings.

End Games for Lahori Qadianis:

Lies and Deceptions on Mirza’s claims of Prophet hood exposed

In the first article, first proof was provided that Mirza did claim Prophet Hood by quoting Verses 26/27 from Surah Al-Jin that he was given the knowledge of the unseen like the Prophets according to his claims. Despite best efforts, in last two years no Lahori Qadiani has given a plausible explanations and answers to our questions and proven that Mirza didn’t meant that he was a prophet.

In this article the case of the hypocrisy of the Lahori Qadianis is further exposed through undeniable evidence.

 A – Writings of Muhammad Ali

Muhammad Ali in the introduction of his little booklet “Promised Messiah” wrote;

In this small book, I have gathered all the points which relate to the claims of the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement so that our Muslim brethren should reflect on them in a cool and dispassionate manner, and see that the path towards which he wants to direct the attention of the Muslim ummah is the path of righteousness and is not in any way a deviation from the religion of Islam, even by a hair’s breadth.

We can assure our readers we intend to do precisely this and look at the claims of Mirza, analyse his writings, the arguments put forward by the Lahori Qadianis and then present the evidence to expose their hypocrisy, deceptions and lies.

Please also keep in mind the quotations from the books of Muhammad Ali provided earlier in this article.

B- Writings of Sher Muhammad

Sher Muhammad wrote a booklet “True Facts Ahmadiyya Movement” in response to an article written by Mr.Tayo from Trinidad.

 On page 7 Sher Muhammad writes;

 We Believe:

 1-  After our Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessing of Allah be upon him) Allah has completely barred the appearance of a Prophet, old or new.

 2-  After Muhammad SAW, Gabriel can never descend and bring Prophetic Revelations (wahy Nubuwwah) to any person.

 3-    If Gabriel were to descend with one word of Prophetic Revelation (Wahy Nubuwwah) on any person, it would contradict the two complementary verses: Holy Quran.

 “This day have I perfected your Religion for you” (5:3);

 “He is the Messenger of Allah and the Last (Seal) of the Propehts” (33:40).

 On Page 27 PDF he continued and issued a challenge;

 A Challenge

 There are scores of other similar reference where Hazrat Mirza Sahib has clarified that wahy Nabuwwah ceased after the Holy Prophet; and that his own revelation is wahy wilayah. We challenge Mr. Tayo to produce even a couple of extracts from Hazrat Mirza Sahib’s books where he should claim that his revelation is not wahy wilayah but wahy nubuwwah. He can never meet this challenge!

Put these two quotes together, one has to provide simple proof that according to Mirza Gabriel indeed brought him the revelations.

On P35 PDF Sher Muhammad further writes quoting an advertisement by Mirza on 4 November 1900;

 “Since it has been arranged in this census that each sect that is distinguished from other sects by its beliefs should be entered separately, and the name that a sect selects for itself shall be the one used for it in official documents… the name that is suitable for this Movement, and which we select for our Community is Muslims of the Ahmadiyya Section.. We ask the government to use this name in its documents for our section… This sect has been named Muslims of Ahmadiyya Sect because our Holy Prophet had two names: Muhammad and Ahmad (peace and blessing of God be upon him). For this reason it is fitting to name this sect the Amadiyya Sect.”

 We can only thank the followers of Mirza; they keep proving Mirza a liar. Muhammad Ali off course knew that sects are forbidden in the Holy Quran. But didn’t he know that Mirza himself announced that the Government should call them as Ahmaddiyya sect?

 Evidence from two stalwart of Lahori Qadianis, proving that Mirza has gone against the clear-cut decree of the Holy Quran and created a sect. The Quranic concept and decrees are discussed in detail earlier according to which, the affair of Mirza is indeed with Allah SWT.

 3- Mirza claimed Prophet Hood: Irrefutable Proof

We have presented comprehensive analysis and irrefutable proofs that the Lahori’s believes and claim that Mirza never claimed Prophet Hood. They falsely claim that whenever, he claimed Prophet Hood he always meant and professed that he is not a Prophet in real sense of the Word but only a prophet in metaphorical sense, or due to him annihilating himself in the love of Prophet Muhammad SAW. Fact of the matter is, he was nothing like Prophet Muhammad SAW in his character or personality; he had absolutely no love for the Prophet in his heart. He made fun of the Quranic revelations whenever it suited him.

RK 3 P8 Azala-e-Auham P511

 In Azala-e-Auham Mirza writes; 4-    The Holy Quran declared that there could be no Prophet after Prophet SAW the “Khatim-un-Nabeen”, either new or old. The Prophet received the religions education (wahi) through Gabriel. The descend of Gabriel to bring the prophetic revelations is closed. It is therefore, impossible that a Prophets comes to the world without the prophetic revelations. 

 Mirza clearly said that descend of Gabriel is forbidden to bring revelations after Prophet SAW. The same excuse is used by the Lahori Qadianis to claim that Mirza was not a Prophet and he never claimed Prophet hood. Evidence of their claims are produced in this article and before too.

We got confirmations from different resources of Lahori Qadianis that in fact the revelation through Gabriel is not possible after the advent of the Last Prophet Muhammad SAW, of Allah SWT. If Gabriel to bring one word of the revelation to anyone, then the seal of the finality of Prophet Hood is broken, which contradicts the Quranic teachings and the beliefs on the finality of Prophet Hood on our beloved Prophet Muhammad SAW (may peace and blessing of Allah SWT, His Angels and all human be upon him) is broken.

3- Proof Mirza received Prophetic Revelations through Gabriel

 After all the claims by the Lahoris lets look an incredible piece of evidence from the writings of Mirza, which proves that Mirza did claim prophet hood without any shadow of a doubt and that Lahoris are hypocritical liars to claim otherwise.

In Haqeeqat- Ul- Wahi Mirza writes;  “ I will give answers with the Prophet, I will leave my resolves sometimes and sometimes I will fulfil my promises. They will say, “Who gave you this status”? Say (to them) “God shows miracles”. Ail came to me and he has chosen me, he pointed out with his finger that the promise of God is here (Mirza). Thus lucky is one who seeks and finds him (Mirza).”

In the footnotes to this alleged revelations Mirza writes;

“ The overt meanings of this revelations are that I (God) will commit mistakes (or forgo) at times and fulfil sometime. Meanings at times I will do (things) and other time I will not, sometimes My Promise will be fulfilled and sometimes it wouldn’t. These kinds of words are often find in the Word of God, it is written in Ahadiths, I (God) hesitate at the time of ceasing the soul of righteous person, even though God is beyond the capacity to hesitate.  Similar is this revelations of God that sometimes My Will is fulfilled and other times it remains unfulfilled. It means that I (God) sometimes cancel my Will and Pre-destination (for creations) and sometimes act on them.

At this place (in these revelations) God has given Gabriel the name “Ail” because he (Gabriel) is constantly in communication (with Mirza).

Without shadow of any doubt according to this passage Mirza indeed claimed Prophet Hood. He said Gabriel constantly brought revelations to him and chosen him as a Prophet (supposedly on the orders of God).

The claims of Lahori Qadianis are based on deceptions and word twisting, they deliberately ignore this clear-cut evidence that according to Mirza he did received the revelations from Gabriel. Not only this claim is included in the writings of Mirza that he received revelations from Gabriel, but it is claimed to be alleged Wahi received by Mirza, in other words it is the Word of God coming to Mirza.

How Lahori can deny such evidence of alleged revelations to Mirza? Simple answer is they are hypocritical dishonest people, who falsely try to claim that because they consider Prophet SAW as last Prophet therefore they should be treated as Muslims. Their claim that Mirza never claimed prophet hood is a blatant lie, he did claim he received revelations from Gabriel this evidence in fact is answer to all their deliberate lies and concoctions. After all it is their own claims that if Gabriel brings even one world of Prophetic revelations; the seal of the Prophet Hood is broken. Mirza said Gabriel approached him again and again and selected him as a Prophet to receive the revelations.

Hypocrisy of Qadianis: They Declared Muslims Kaffirs

Qadianis make a great fuss that the Muslims are unjustly declaring them Kaffirs. This is hypocrisy by them; they themselves have declared Muslims Kaffirs. Even though Lahoris try to portray themselves to be innocent of such charge, but they are as guilty as the other Qadianis.

 1-  Mirza’s hypocrisy and canned logic, he declares Muslims Kaffirs

Mirza used canned logic all his life he used similar logic in declaring Muslims kaffirs.

Mirza writes; “When Jesus (As) was asked for a miracle, Jesus (As) said, these ill-gotten (bastards) and bad character people are asking from me a miracle. They would not be shown any miracle. How Jesus (As) cleverly pre-planned his defence, one has to admit or declare that he is ill gotten (bastard) and of bad (or immoral) character, before asking for a miracle. A mischievous and deceptive person who has the nature of Jesus (as) announced, I can teach a spell by chanting it one can see God on first night. Provided the chanter is not a bastard.  Now who will accept that he is a bastard, and say he didn’t see God after chanting the spell? In the end every chanter had to say he has seen God.

 We have to be appreciative of the forward thinking of Jesus (as) (a sarcastic remark by Mirza).”

 After slating the non-existing Jesus As, according to Mirza. Mirza adopted the same practice, he accused the imaginary Jesus.

 Mirza writes, “Questioner asked; you wrote in Tariaq-e-Qaloob (and other books) a person does not become kafir by not accepting you, now you wrote, by denying me one becomes kafir.

 Answer (given by Mirza); It is strange, you consider one who call me a Kaffir and one who denies me as two separate entities. In the eyes of God they are one and the same. The one who does not (believes) accept me, doesn’t believes because he considers me a liar. But Allah SWT decreed the one who associate lies to Allah SWT is worst then the Kaffirs, like it is Decreed (quoted V) there are two kind of Kaffirs, one who associate lies to Allah SWT and the other who make fun of the word of God. In this sense I am not only a Kaffir but also a Grand Kaffir. But if I am not a liar then that Kuffar would be associated to him (my denier).

Mirza further writes as a note at the bottom of the page:

 “Here “zalim” means Kaffir. One who associates lies to the Book of God (Holy Quran) is called a “Zalim” compare to a liar. Without any doubts a person who makes fun of Word of God (Holy Quran) is a Kaffir. Thus, a person, who does not accept me and calls me a liar and a Kaffir, by calling me a Kaffir he becomes a Kaffir.”

 1-  Mirza, without shadow of a doubt has made fun of the Holy Quran, the Word of Allah SWT he has associated white lies to the Holy Quran. Proofs of these lie and disrespect for the Holy Quran are shown in this article and in our previous articles. According to his own words Mirza is proven not only a Kaffir but also a Grand Kaffir. His followers off course have a choice to prove that the evidence is wrong. But they face an uphill or dare we say an impossible task.

 2- Mirza is using the canned logic on grand scale here. His logic is I am going to associate white lies to the Holy Quran, make claims, which are completely against the teachings of the Holy Quran; make fun of mighty Prophets of Allah SWT. But if someone calls me a liar or due to my lies call me a Kaffir then that person becomes Kaffir. Didn’t he accuse Imaginary Jesus AS of the Holy Bible of the same?

2- Muhammad Ali declaring Muslims Kaffirs

Muhammad Ali in line with the writings of Mirza and by quoting a Hadiths calls every Muslim a Kaffir, who does not believe in the lies of Mirza and rightly call him as Kazib.

“A man who calls the Promised Messiah a Kafir, or Kazib or Dajjal, under the verdict of Hadith, he becomes a kafir apart from these people there are those who have not accepted his claim, or they have not yet yielded the pledge of faith and loyalty, they do not become kafirs, just because they denied the claim (P39, Radd-i-Takfir-Ahl-i-Qabila,)

Muhammad Ali, who is considered to be a Scholar by the Lahori Qadianis should have known the writings of Mirza and if he knew Quran like his and Qadianis claims, then he should have no doubt about the character of Mirza and should have known his lies in the light of the teachings of the Holy Quran.

By following Mirza he is confirming the absurd logic of Qadianis to used weird explanations (taweels) to cover up the lies of Mirza against the Holy Quran, against Prophets Etc.

Conclusion

In this article we exposed some of the fundamental issues, which are quite a regular feature of the arguments put forward by the followers of Mirza in general and Lahori Qadianis in particular.

First to show that their claims they are Muslims because they recite Kalima is utter non-sense. There is more to being a Muslim then just to recite the Kalima or offer prayers. Muslims have to adhere to different articles of faith in their entirety and whole heartedly, without using conjecture to be called and claim being Muslims.

In the second segment, we produced a detail analysis of the meanings used by Mirza and his followers, particularly Lahori Qadianis that Mirza did not claim Prophet Hood and they believe in the finality of Prophet Hood on Prophet Muhammad SAW. Then we introduced a quotation from Mirza, which destroy their arguments completely.

In between Qadiani’s claim to be 73^rd and only saved sects based on the writings of Mirza, was destroyed with the help of evidence from the Holy Quran. We also demonstrated that Lahori stalwart like Muhammad Ali knew that creating sects in Islam is forbidden in the Holy Quran, but he deliberately ignored the claims and writings of Mirza, which contradicted a very clear cut decree of the Holy Quran. Where as Sher Muhammad proudly presented the evidence from Mirza obviously he didn’t understand the Quranic commands in this regard or deliberately ignorned it, exactly like Muhammad Ali.

To double the misery for his followers, the heresy of Mirza to receive the revelations from Gabriel and selected by Gabriel is introduced as divine revelations by Mirza. Therefore, they have to produce evidence from the Holy Quran to clear Mirza. Quoting from the books of someone will not absolve Mirza. We also remind them of the writings of Sher Muhammad quoted above, this claim of Mirza in fact is against the two verses of the Holy Quran, i.e. completion of relgion of Islam and finality of Prophethood on our beloved Prophet Muhammad SAW.

In the end we leave with this message of the Holy Quran for those Qadianis, either the mainstream or Lahori, the silent majority who had been lied to, betrayed and taken advantage of, by Mirza and then by his followers in the places of authority.

34:31And [yet,] those who are bent on denying the truth do say, “We shall never believe in this Qur’an, and neither in whatever there still remains of earlier Revelations!” But if thou couldst only see [how it will be on Judgment Day,] when these evildoers shall be made to stand before their Sustainer, hurling reproaches back and forth at one another! Those [of them] who had been weak [on earth] will say unto those who had gloried in their arrogance: “Had it not been for you, we would certainly have been believers!”

Please do not end up as people described in this verse of the Holy Quran, “Had it not been for you, we would certainly have been believers”. May Allah SWT guide you to the right path, Amen.

All rights reserved © 2010

Preface

A confused person, perhaps a follower of Mirza drew our attention to the beautiful writings of Mirza on the meanings of word “Bap” in Urdu or Father in English.

Mirza wrote these beautiful explanations of the word Father in response to the Christians who off course use “Father” for God and “son” for Isa As (Jesus).

Obnoxious writings of Mirza

We produce another masterpiece from the writings of Mirza.

Those who have concocted this lie against Hadarat Messih AS that he As used to call Khuda Talla (again the horrid word used by Mirza) Father. And that he actually believed the Almighty to be his As Father. They have invented a false and dirty allegation against Ibne Mariam AS. Can an intelligent person think that Hadarat Messih AS could commit such error. This word in it’s literally meanings is such a dirty word, which shows weakness and helplessness from every angle. Same word Ibne Mariam AS would use for Allah SWT? Isa Ibne Mariam did not have this right to create these meanings; meanings which so rude that they are showing illiteracy and/lack of knowledge.

The dictionary didn’t give any more importance to the meaning of the word father then the male who lodge his seed in the ovary of a female. The seed then becomes another living creature due to the miracle of another being (Allah SWT). The one who lodged the seed would be called “father”.

There is no trace of nurturing or sign of love in this word. For example a Ram mount a Ewe and lodge his seed inside her; or a bull mount the cow and after completing the act of sexuality ran away without thinking that a calf may be born. Or a Boar who is full of carnival desires, he performed this act over and over without thinking that due to his repeated act of carnival desires many piglets may be born.

What a beautiful language Mirza have used for a natural act, which is part of living beings life on planet earth. But Mirza just couldn’t resist bringing his xxx rated narration in to the meanings of the word father.

Mirza claim he is like son of God

Did Mirza follow his own advice?  Evidence from Tadkirah;

It is a common knowledge that the concept of trinity in Christianity revolves around three pronged God heads, The Father, the son and the Holy Spirit. If we pay close attention to above quoted alleged ilhams they represent the same three God heads involved in the Christians concept of trinity.

1-    Here clearly Allah SWT is allegedly calling Mirza like a son, therefore, He SWT becomes like his “Father” (nauzobillah).

2-    Mirza allegedly received the ilhams from Allah SWT “you are to me like my Son” therefore; he became the “son” (nauzobillah).

3-    But Mirza didn’t stop there he also included in these ilhams another sentence to complete the trinity. He writes that he allegedly received the ilham” I along with the Spirit am with you and the members of your family.”

Proof, all the three God heads are presented by Mirza Kazab. He had the gal to accuse the Christians for something he himself introduced deceptively. Is this “true Islam” this kazzab wants to introduce to his followers? Lanatullah alal kazabeen.

There should be absolutely no doubt  on the intentions of Mirza in this set of ilahms. He started it with an attack on the concept of “Tauheed” by claiming the alleged revelations that Allah SWT disclosed to him that he is to Allah SWT like “My Unity” and “My Uniqueness”.

Mirza defended by the follower

One of Mirza’s follower Mr. Naeem M Memon in response to the book 3 in 1 has written following incredible piece, his book is very proudly displayed on official Qadiani’s website.

While one does not accept that this is a perfectly accurate translation of Hadhrat Ahmad’s^as original statement, one still calls upon every honest and sincere person to read this passage, albeit not a faithful reproduction of the original and truly determine if there is any claim of Divinity contained herein. In the first instance, one draws one’s attention to the following passages of this citation:

1. I saw in one of my contemplative visions [kashf] that I am God myself and believed that I am the same.

2. In this state I submitted that we need a new system and a new sky.

3. Then the state of contemplative vision converted into inspiration and I started muttering: ‘These are inspirations I am enlightened with by God Almighty’.

These passages in the hostile publications are an admission that this entire scenario was being observed by Hadhrat Ahmad^as in a state of vision. Now, every rational human being, whether a believer or not, would accept that a person who sees something in a dream or a vision cannot be held responsible for it since at that precise moment when a dream or vision is being observed, one’s faculties are not in one’s possession at all. If Abdul Hafeez refuses to accept this explanation then one would ask him as to how would he reconcile Hadhrat Muhammad’s^sa dream or vision in which he saw himself wearing two gold bangles on his wrist when Muslim men have been forbidden to wear gold. Would he care to state that God forbid, the Prophet of Islam^sa contravened the laws of Islam contrary to the explicit command of God?

We are absolutely horrified from the logic displayed by Mr. Memon. He is defending Mirza in this incredibly callous and downright obnoxious way. Before we proceed further it is helpful to present a Hadiths from Bukhari.

False dreams are from Satan

Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 87 115:
Narrated Abu Qatada:
The Prophet said, “A good dream that comes true is from Allah, and a bad dream is from Satan, so if anyone of you sees a bad dream, he should seek refuge with Allah from Satan.”

According to the Hadith traditions there are two sources of dreams; the true dreams are from Allah SWT and bad or false  are from Satan. Coming back to incredible logic by Mr. Memon, he says that the recipient of the dreams should not be held responsible for the dreams he has, his faculties during the sleep are not under his control. We accept this explanation from Mr. Memon, but would he accept the ramifications of his statement? Let us elaborate it. We already produced Hadiths describing two sources of two kinds of dreams.

1-He says Mirza is not responsible for these dreams, fine, but then Satan must be responsible for all the dreams Mirza had which are so demonstratively against the teachings of the Holy Quran.

2- Qadianis according to the logic used by Mr. Memon have to accept that the teachings of Mirza should be rejected out of hand; they were inspired by the Satan.

3- We have already demonstrated fraud and deceptions of this cult in compilation and translation of tadkirah. The explanation of Mr. Memon then renders this alleged book of divine revelations useless. There is plenty of internal evidence to prove it to be so.

Quranic evidence against those who try to have a share in the Divinity of Allah SWT

The dreams of Mirza can not be from Allah SWT, because Allah SWT does not share His Divinity or His Unfathomable knowledge with anyone. Quran is full of such verses, where Allah SWT decreed in very clear and precise manner that non share His Divinity.

We produce few of such examples from the Holy Quran. First the warning to those who accept the claims of false claimants that they are exercising a bad judgment.

Then the warnings that on the Day of the Judgment they will suffer the consequences of their actions. These false claimants could not save them from the torment await them due to their foolishness that led them astray, by following the lies and concoctions of these Claimants.

The foolish defender of Mirza accept Mirza is a Kazzab

As is the practice by the Qadianis, Mr. Memon straight away jumped his gun and attacks the dreams of Prophet Muhammad SAW. All we can say is that Mr. Memon is extremely foolish to point to this dream mentioned in the Bukhari. He is doing a disservice to his cult by pointing to something which destroys the credibility of Mirza completely. We are just amazed how this cult allows people like Memon to write on their official web site. We produce the Hadiths from Bukhari, which is referred by Mr. Memon.

5.659: Narrated Ibn `Abbas: Musailima Al-Kadhdhab came during the lifetime of the Prophet and started saying, “If Muhammad gives me the rule after him, I will follow him.” And he came to Medina with a great number of the people of his tribe. Allah’s Apostle went to him in the company of Thabit bin Qais bin Shammas, and at that time, Allah’s Apostle had a stick of a date-palm tree in his hand. When he (i.e. the Prophet ) stopped near Musailima while the latter was amidst his companions, he said to him, “If you ask me for this piece (of stick), I will not give it to you, and Allah’s Order you cannot avoid, (but you will be destroyed), and if you turn your back from this religion, then Allah will destroy you. And I think you are the same person who was shown to me in my dream, and this is Thabit bin Qais who will answer your questions on my behalf.” Then the Prophet went away from him. I asked about the statement of Allah’s Apostle : “You seem to be the same person who was shown to me in my dream,” and Abu Huraira informed me that Allah’s Apostle said, “When I was sleeping, I saw (in a dream) two bangles of gold on my hands and that worried me. And then I was inspired Divinely in the dream that I should blow on them, so I blew on them and both the bangles flew away. And I interpreted it that two liars (who would claim to be prophets) would appear after me. One of them has proved to be Al Ansi and the other, Musailima.”

Mr. Memon well done. This Hadiths is actually not use of Gold Bangles at all, those bangles were actually blown away in the dream of Prophet Muhammad SAW but it is on the topic of false claimants of Prophethood after Prophet Muhammad SAW.

All we can say Mr. Memon that you are a true follower of Mirza Al-Kadhdhab. Mr. Memon’s incredible stupidity, dishonesty and lies are not limited to above, one of our Muslim brother has pointed to another of Mr. Memon’s lies on a discussion forum. We produce  another quote from Mr. Memon’s response to the book 3 in 1.

Follower defend Mirza’s English revelations

This unending tirade against Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad^as by the author of Two in One continues relentlessly and for some reason or the other, Abdul Hafeez quotes some revelations vouchsafed unto Hadhrat Ahmad^as without actually stating what he finds objectionable about them. In the absence of him stating his objections, one can only assume that he probably objects to these being vouchsafed unto Hadhrat Ahmad^as in a language other than Arabic. In that event, one would ask him as to what would he make of the following revelation vouchsafed unto Hadhrat Muhammad^sa in Persian:

Mr. Memon despite writing following revelation vouchsafed unto Prophet Muhammad SAW did not provide evidence of these alleged Persian revelations in this article. No Quadiani despite constant reminders could produce the evidence for these Persian revelations to Prophet Muhammad SAW. This is the true caliber and motives of  Qadiani’s  so called Scholars. They introduce bald face lies in their articles and books, following in the footstep of Mirza Al-Kadhahab.

No Mr. Memon, we Muslims don’t only have the objection to the fact that Mirza received revelations in the language other then his own mother tongue/language, this practice is in direct conflict with the Quranic verses;  but we also have proofs how did Mirza concocted these English/Hebrew Ilhams. We were saved the excruciating pain to read the German ilhams by refusal of Mirza to M Sadiq. Did you notice Mr. Memon; the dreams were seen by Sadiq and not by your Mirza Al-Kadhahab. It seems in the Qadiani’s dream factory dreams of every one were divine.

But unfortunately for you and your cult, proofs displayed in our previous articles, show very clearly that Mirza’s followers knew he was not truthful, otherwise how some one in his right mind would give this advice to a so called, self proclaimed Prophet that I should start learning languages? Who was receiving the ilhams, the fake Prophet or the blind and crooked follower? Your fake prophet has stooped to the unimaginable depth by presenting his alleged revelations to a Hindu boy for correction. It seems Mirza Al-Kadhahab didn’t have confidence on himself. He knew the extent of his knowledge of English language. English he learned through the books given to him by people like Sadiq.

How someone like Zafarullah in his right mind, could change the English ilhams of Mirza and correct his blunders, without realizing the lies and concoctions of Mirza? Or do you accept that god of Mirza made those mistakes? Liars like you have no where to run.

The problem for you Qadianis is that most of Mirza’s so called revelations are against the clear cut decrees in the holy Quran. For example Holy Quran clearly decreed that Christians should desist from attributing divinity to anyone beside Allah SWT.

Quranic evidence against Trinity and Mirza

Allah SWT clearly decreed that He SWT is utterly remote from having a son, but Mirza writes he allegedly received revelations from Allah SWT calling him “You are to me like my son”. So whose words should we Muslim believe? Yes, you got it right; there is not much of a choice between the Holy Quran and books of Mirza Al-Kadhahab. We have already exposed numerous lies of Mirza and we will continue to do so.

Conclusions

Mirza’s dreams couldn’t have come from Allah SWT but only from Satan, the accursed, as per Hadiths traditions quoted. Mirza the grand liar of Qadian have used lies, deceptions, fraud all his life. He has written against the Quranic teachings and clear cut commands. He can not be trusted; no sensible and honest person can have any other thought but to discard a discredited person like Mirza out of hand. His followers are following in his footsteps and writing lies and committing frauds.

This is a common practice adopted by the followers of Mirza that when they introduce a lie or something which they knew would land them in the hot water, they always quote from the books of others who have made similar claims. We have only this to say on this practice of Qadianis. First of all most of the quotes are deceptively produce; they are either out of context or just picked up from the middle of a longer narrations, had full narration been produced would change the emphasis completely. But we are of the opinion, it does not matter, if someone has made similar claims; they all will suffer the same consequences mentioned in the Holy Quran. No Muslim is above the decrees of the Holy Quran. No one is more important then Prophet Muhammad SAW, without exceptions.

We leave those Qadianis who still have a chance to redeem themselves with these Quranic verses.

May Allah SWT open your eyes before it is too late to repent.

All rights reserved © 2009

Preface

Can Mirza be a prophet after having so many shortcomings and faults as a person? He was unreliable, he was a khazin, he was a Kazzab, and he used conjecture and deceptions regularly in every aspect of his life. He had beliefs of Shirk majority of his life according to his own admissions. He practiced magical tricks and mumbo jumbo suited to a Hindu Jogi rather then a Prophet according to the Islamic doctrine.

We have systematically built a case against Mirza based on his own criteria.

We exposed him on the test of being Sadiq in our first article. Then we produced evidence that he told white lies about his Grand father, which conclusively proved that he failed the test of Sadiq.

We continue that theme here and produce more evidence against Mirza. We have also demonstrated that the alleged book of divine revelations “Tadkirah” contains error and blatant frauds and deceptions by the compilers and translator. Proving without shadow of any doubt that these revelations could not be from Allah SWT. Either this fact or Quadianis have to accept this bizarre notion that Allah SWT can make mistakes (nauzobillah), a thought which can not cross any Muslim’s mind.

In this article we are dealing with his claims that the Quranic verses 69:44/46 are testimony to his truthfulness and the test contained therein also applies to him.

Prophets can not deceive

Quran provides a clear cut decree on the basic quality of all the Prophets of Allah SWT.

3:161 (Asad) AND IT IS not conceivable that a prophet should deceive – since he who deceives shall be faced with his deceit on the Day of Resurrection, when every human being shall be repaid in full for whatever he has done, and none shall be wronged.

When faced with the lies and deceptions of Mirza, his follower’s standard response is to attack Prophet Muhammad SAW and the Quran. They have been feed these crooked lies by their deceitful and deceptive cult. The lies purported by twisting the meanings of the Quranic verses. They usually bring the evidence from the Quran that Prophet Ibrahim AS lied (nauzobillah).

Quadiani’s allegations against Prophet Ibrahim AS

These allegations are based on a verse in Surah Anbiya

21:63 (Asad) He answered: “Nay, it was this one, the big­gest of them, that did it: but ask them [yourselves] – provided they can speak!”

Many translators and commentators have fallen pray to the wrong translation, meanings and explanations of this verse. We have produced the translation by Asad, which indicates use of Nay. We produce word by word translation of this verse to clarify the real meanings portrayed in the holy Quran, Allah SWT knows the best.

Qala= He said (Ibrahim), Bal= But, off course, indeed, F’allahu=  someone did it (passive), Kabiruhum= The biggest one, Haza= this, F’asalahum= ask them,  In= If, Kannu yantiqun= they can speak.

It is quite apparent, Ibrahim As according to this Quranic verse definitely did not used the word Nay or No at all. But majority of translator and Mufasir decided to introduce this word Nay or No, based on the commentary by an earlier Mufasir. The word by word translations of this verse is;   He said off course someone did it; the biggest one, ask them, if they can speak.   It is important to point out that there is a pause (Waqf) used in the Quran after the word F’allahu, denoted by the punctuation mark, exactly like a coma in the English language.

Therefore, a pause is needed before continuing the sentence to bring out its correct meanings.   Before we continue on the point of pause, it is also important to point to 21:58 which states clearly why Prophet Ibrahim AS left the biggest of them standing.

21:58 And then he broke those [idols] to pieces, [all] save the biggest of hem, so that they might [be able to] turn to it.

It was always the intentions of Hazrat Ibrahim AS that he would ask the idol worshipers to turn to the big one and ask the question from him.

In verse 21:57 by pausing at F’allahu as required the meaning become clearer and shows that no denial or acceptance was done by Ibrahim As. But he intelligently and passively said, some one has done it, it could be anyone but surely someone has done it, enquire from the victims themselves who done it, if they can speak. He As provided the audience food for thought that their gods couldn’t protect themselves; how they can be treated as all powerful, all Knowing?

Picktall, for example in the translation of this verse did not use the word Nay or No compare to other commentators, but he still fall victim of not pausing after F’allahu, to convey the right meaning of this verse.

The translations and tafsir are the words and understanding of the person and not the Word of Allah SWT.  This distinction is necessary whenever we have to analyse the verses in the Quran. The tafsir are for understanding only, but the authors of tafasir can surely make mistakes or have erroneous translations or explanations, understanding of any verse in the Holy Quran.

Qadianis face another dilemma on the translation and in understanding of this issue. Their cult own resources also shows that they are aware of the correct usage of this verse. Their Ka-Lip II in the explanation of this verse in the foot note writes that there is no need to use the pause after Bil f’allahu, to give it the correct meanings, as per suggestions. Ka-Lip II point is that Ibrahim AS already told the followers of these idols before hand that he intended to destroy the idols. Ka-Lip II also said in no uncertain terms that it is not a lie.

We leave it here and proceed with the main purpose of our article.

 True Prophets did not make mistakes in the matter of beliefs

We Muslims believe that Prophets of God can never make mistakes in the matter of beliefs and Iman and sin. Therefore, tendency towards paganism or shirk was never found in the true Prophets of God. The Prophets according to Islamic teachings are entrusted with Message of God, the basic foundation of this Message is monotheism from God, any tendency to associate partners with God or perform any other kind of Shirk was unimaginable for a True Prophet of God.

In this article we are deliberately ignoring the concoctions by Mirza and Qadiani’s on the meaning of the Words “Khatam/Khatim unNabiaan”.  Mirza has used different meanings for these words too, like every thing else of any consequence and validity in the matter of faith and Iman.  And we also leave the practice of shirk by Mirza for a future article, both of these topics need a comprehensive and thorough look into the writings of Mirza.

The Prophets of God can not commit cardinal sins either, or anything else which shows lack of character and faults in their personalities. Examples of this could be misuse of Amanat, Mirza running away with pension money, or for decades keeping the advances given for the book Brahaeen by the subscribers. Mirza claimed to have returned the money after lapse of over two decades. Untruthfulness (too numerous to mention), use of Intoxicants; regular use of Opium and perhaps also Tonic Wine; abusive language (to numerous to mention), and other visible and apparent flaws in character and/or conduct.

Prophets were sent as an example and as models for ordinary human being; they were entrusted with divine revelations due to their morality and strength of their characters. We have stated it before; Prophethood is not a degree obtainable from a University. One passing certain tests or he gradually elevated to the status of Prophet, like Mirza tried to imply and claim.

According to the Islamic teachings Prophets are susceptible to make minor errors such as error of judgment but they are incapable to commit sins. However, those errors are pointed out to them by God and are not left uncorrected. Quranic evidence suggests that all the Prophets of God were the best examples of piety and guidance for their people.

We have already dealt with Mirza’s lies that Allah SWT does not leave him in error or let him forget anything for a blink of an eye. The fact remains, his mistakes were never corrected by Allah SWT until his death. We find numerous examples of his errors.

Wisdom and Character were the signs of True Prophets

Prophets were selected by Allah SWT for their Wisdom and Character, to pass the message of God to people, to make them understand the intricacies of the religion and guide them through the examples set by them. In this sense wisdom and intelligence coupled with sound character are natural criterion for the Prophets. Allah SWT has chosen Prophets not only for their Piety and Character but also for their ability to convey the message as it was intended and set an example for the followers.

According to the Islamic beliefs mere intelligence is not the criterion to become a Prophet. For example no matter how intelligent is a person; it is impossible to know the reality of after life by scientific means.

19:61 [theirs will be the] gardens of perpetual bliss which the Most Gracious has promised unto His servants, in a realm which is beyond the reach of human perception: [and,] verily, His promise is ever sure of fulfillment!

Similarly scientists are still baffled on the origin of the universe, even though they claim to have well established theories in this regard but all these theories have problems which science to date can not solve, before these theories could be trusted as reality or scientific facts. For example Science despite best efforts has failed to find the special particle given name “Higgs Boson” or any evidence of the anti-gravitational force which according to scientists was responsible for the inflation of the matter at the time of the big bang. Or the “God Particle” which gives mass to other particles. Experiments are on going to find the answers to these issues and find the God Particle.

Mirza declares that a liar is against the Tauheed

Khuda Talla (once again this horrid word used by Mirza) wants “wahadat” oneness (of Allah SWT). A person who causes problems to his brother, lies, misappropriate and backbite is the enemy of this “wahadat” oneness (of Allah SWT). (Badar V2 N4 P2 26 January 1906)

Mirza in his bold attempts (as was his practice through out his life) has completely put himself in a corner by above sayings. In our previous articles we have systematically proven that Mirza was a liar, he associated white lies to Allah SWT. Now he is admitting that lies are against the concepts of Uniqueness and Unity of Allah SWT.

Truthfulness of the Prophets: Quranic Evidence

Quranic evidence suggests that the Prophets peace be upon them all were truthful first and foremost. They did not deceive anyone, the holy Quran declared;

1- Prophet Ibrahim AS was truthful;

19:41 AND CALL to mind, through this divine writ, Abraham. Behold, he was a man of truth, [already] a prophet.

We Muslims believe that there are no contradictions in the Holy Quran, therefore, in the presence of 19:41 to translate 21:63 as evidence of Lie by Abraham is erroneous. We firmly believe there are absolutely no contradictions in the Holy Quran.

2- Ibrahim As son, Ismael AS was truthful;

19:54 AND CALL to mind, through this divine writ, Ishmael. Behold, he was always true to his promise, and was an apostle [of God], a prophet,

3- Prophet Idris (Enoch) was truthful too;

19:56 AND CALL to mind, through this divine writ, Idris. Behold, he was a man of truth, a prophet,

We also find the evidence in the Holy Quran in the words of a fellow prisoner for H Youssuf (Joseph) AS;

12:46 [And he went to see Joseph in the prison and said to him:] “Joseph, O thou truthful one! Enlighten us about [the meaning of a dream in which] seven fat cows were being devoured by seven emaciated ones, and seven green ears [of wheat appeared] next to [seven] others that were withered – so that I may return [with thy explanation] unto the people [of the court, and] that they may come to know [what manner of man thou art]!”

There is plenty of evidence in the Quran to demonstrate that the first quality Prophets had was their truthfulness. If they were not truthful how their followers and we could have trusted them to relay the Messages sent by Allah SWT for the guidance of the humanity in different ages?

We have consistently built up the case against Mirza that he was not honest and truthful. To demonstrate that he should be rejected out of hand, without questions or any doubts; whatsoever.

Quranic evidence “Truthfulness” a condition for the Believers

Quadiani always try to bring the evidence from Quran 24:59 that people can be in the company of the Righteous, the Martyrs, The Saints and the Prophets if they do the rightful deeds. This is a separate topic so we leave it for our future articles. Quadianis keep forgetting that The Holy Quran also declares that people who attained to faith should remain Sadiq i.e. true to their words.

9:119 O YOU who have attained to faith! Remain conscious of God, and be among those who are true to their word!

According to the Quranic declaration, Mirza due to his lies could not even be a believer, let alone be a Prophet.

49:15 [Know that true] believers are only those who have attained to faith in God and His Apostle and have left all doubt behind, and who strive hard in God’s cause with their possessions and their lives: it is they, they who are true to their word!

Allah SWT in the above verse set out the conditions for true believers. The true believers are those who attained to faith in Allah SWT and his Messenger SAW, left their doubts behind, they strive hard for the cause of Allah, they are the Sadiqoon, i.e. true to their words.

It is a well known fact that Mirza declared striving in the cause of God forbidden for his followers. He surely failed on two counts, the conditions set out in the above verse. First being a liar and second in his efforts to abolish striving in the cause of God on the behest of his true masters, the British.

How Christian Emperor Judged claims of Prophet Muhammad SAW

The truthfulness of the claimant of Prophethood is not merely confined to the Muslims. After the Huddabiya, Prophet Muhammad SAW sent letters to different rulers. One letter was sent to the Byzantine Emperor. At that time Abu Suffiyan a bitter enemy of Prophet Muhammad SAW was present in Syria with his Caravan. The Emperor summoned him to assess the claims of Prophet Muhammad SAW. Among other questions he also asked Abu Suffiyan has anyone ever heard Prophet Muhammad SAW tell a lie. Abu Suffiyan answered in negative. The Emperor responded by saying “it is inconceivable for one who has never told a lie during his life to invent lies against God”.

Therefore, a Christian Emperor considered test of truthfulness to judge the claims of Prophet Muhammad SAW. The test Mirza has failed consistently through out his life. We have demonstrated with proofs that the alleged divine book “Tadkirah” contains deliberate lies and fraud by this cult, to establish credibility of Mirza in the eyes of the readers.

This alleged book claimed to have contained the revelation from Allah SWT. It was our main purpose to demonstrate that Mirza lied and attributed lies to Allah SWT on such momentous occasions in his life. No body forgets death of his father and brother. It is even more important that the information contained therein is free of errors if you are attributing it to be revelation from Allah SWT. Fact remains the evidence from the books of Mirza showed conclusively that Mirza missed the year of his brother death by 4 years at one place and another place he killed him 2 years before his actual death. He also missed death of his father by 2 years. How such a liar could claim that he received the news of their deaths from Allah SWT as a Prophecy, is beyond comprehension.

We have also shown to our readers, subsequent fraudulent efforts by his sons and Zafrullah to fool the readers and followers of Mirza. There appears a pattern of lies and deceit starting from Mirza and spreading to his sons. How Quadianis in their right minds can trust liars and fraudster like them is beyond us. These liars would not hesitate for a minute to attribute lies to Allah SWT; what other proofs needed to know their lies and characters?

Test set by the Hadiths Traditions

 This is the exact test Mirza failed miserably. He can not be trusted, he is a habitual liar, he can associate lies against God like he has done all his life.

Prophet Muhammad SAW according to the narration in Bukhari and Muslim said;

“It is incumbent upon you to be always truthful for truthfulness leads to righteousness and righteousness leads to Paradise, if a man is always truthful and seeks truthfulness, he is recorded by God as truthful one. Always avoid lying for lying leads to shamefulness and shamefulness leads to Hell. If a man insists on lying and seeks deceit, he is record by God as a liar. “

(Bukhari Book of Adab N69, Muslim Birr N105).

Mirza can not attend righteousness due to his lies, he can not be admitted to the Paradise, his abode surely is hell according to the traditions quoted.

Mirza’s false claims; are they based on Quranic verses?

After demonstrating every step of the way that Mirza was a liar, now  we turn our attention to a trap deceptively set by Mirza. In his efforts to confuse and misguide the poor and uneducated villagers of rural Punjab. He claimed that the verses in Surrah Haqqah are testimony to his truthfulness; his jugular veins would have been swerved if he has attributed lie(s) to Allah SWT.

Believe me I am not a liar. All the holy books of Khuda (Allah SWT) witness that a liar is killed early. He is not given longevity in his life, like a truthful person obtains. The king of all the truthful persons is our Prophet Muhammad SAW. He SAW was given 23 years for his revelations. This duration is a barometer until the day of the Judgment for truthful persons. The one, who includes a liar in this barometer, may thousands of (Lanat) curses of Allah SWT, the Angels and the righteous people upon him. Even if this verse was not in the Quran and all the true Prophets of Allah SWT did not said that liars do not achieve the barometer set for the revelations. Even then, the love for our Prophet SAW does not allow a true Muslim to say that this barometer of 23 three years of revelations given to Prophet Muhammad SAW; can be given to a liar. The way Holy Quran in clear terms described that if this Prophet (SAW) was a liar (nauzobillah) then he would have never be given this barometer for the duration of revelations. The Torah and the Bible also gave same testimony. What kind of Islam and Muslims are they, to reject these testimonies like a waste; just in my opposition?

Mirza in above quotation failed to provide any evidence or reference from the Torah and the Bible; therefore, for time being we will ignore it to proceed further.

Secondly; Mirza deceptively writes that all the Prophets of Allah SWT said that liars do not get the longevity given to the true Prophets. He is absolutely wrong,  we will prove in this article that true prophets were killed by people, some of them very young and very early during their ministry.

Mirza’s claim for his share in Quranic test confirmed by Yalesh

Translation: A friend of mine has raised a point with me that  verses 45-48 of Chapter 69 of the Holy Quran: If he had fabricated  any saying and attributed it to Us, We would surely have seized him  by the right hand, and then surely We would have severed his large  artery, and not one of you could have kept Us from it; were special  to the Holy Prophet and were not applicable in the case of any other  claimant of revelation. I explained my point of view to him and the  same night in the context of my discussion with him I received the  revelation (Arabic): Tell them: The true guidance is the guidance of  Allah; meaning that the connotation of these verses which had been  disclosed to me by Allah is the correct one (Arba’een, No.4, pp.5-7).

Evidence from tadkirah established without a shadow of a doubt that Mirza is claiming that Allah SWT has affirmed to him by way of revelations that the test set out by the Quran for the duration of revelations to Prophet Muhammad SAW applies to Mirza too.

As for the alleged Arabic revelations in above quotation; it is word for word copied from the Holy Quran, from the Verse 120 of Al-Baqara and Verse 73 of Al-Imran.

We will prove that not only Mirza lied as usual and attributed white lies to Allah SWT. He definitely did not receive any such revelations and despite him attributing white lies to Allah SWT on regular basis, as we have already demonstrated in our previous articles, no harm was done to him by Allah SWT. The test is set by Mirza; we are merely proving that he has failed the test he so proudly claimed is applicable to him too.

Mirza says this Verse is for the recipients of revelations only

In ZTG Mirza clarifies the implication of these verses further in response to the objection raised by Hafiz Muhammad Youssuf. Mirza writes;

“Insistence by Hafiz Muhammad Youssuf Sahib in every gathering that a person does not die within 23 years if he attributes lies to Khuda Talla (Allah SWT). This means he must have attributed lies to Khuda Talla (Allah SWT) by claiming revelations, but he still did not get killed. In his heart he thinks that Khuda Talla (Allah SWT) decreed this for Prophet SAW, that if he SAW attributed lies to Me (Allah SWT) We (SWT) would have cut his SAW Jugular veins. This is not correct. To think that why Khuda (Allah SWT) did not cut our Jugular veins. The answer to this is that this Verse is for Messengers, Prophets and for those who are appointed (by Allah SWT, whatever this mean). They spread their message to millions of people. The world can be destroyed due to their lies.

But a person who by himself during this divinely prescribed duration did not keep quite until the end. Nor he withdrew his claims. So in this Ummah I am the only person who has been granted 23 years of revelations in the footsteps of Prophet Muhammad SAW. The revelations lasted for 23 years, without interruptions. For this proof I produce the divine Words revealed 21 years ago and published in Braheen-e-Ahmmadiyya. And they were published verbally for 7/8 years. Their witness is confirmed by Braheen-e-Ahmaddiya.”

Before dealing with the serious issues, for lighter side, we like to draw attention of our readers to two hilarious sentences in above quotation. Mirza called himself Sultan of the Pen. But this Sultan, has written “But for 7/8 years they were published verbally”. How something can be verbal if it was published? Secondly this liar, is given testimony for the truthfulness of his quotations from the Braheen for something published in the Braheen. This is called self appointed judge and jury.

For the purpose of this Article we will deal with the issue of Prophets and Messengers in details. This third self created category of “Appointed by God” Mamur min Allah SWT is not worth pondering for the purpose of this article. But we will briefly deal with some claimants of this title.

But in case of Mirza we consider all three possibilities, if nothing else but for the purpose to eliminate any possibilities for Lahori’s to twist it by claiming Mirza never claimed Prophethood.

Fact of the matter is by the time he has written this book, Mirza was already aware that this test does not apply to him. Who knew better then him? He off course was well aware of all the lies he has attributed to Allah SWT and was still alive. This fact is enough to demonstrate his lies and reasons for his approach. In the above quoted paragraph, Mirza has actually spelled it out in no uncertain terms that a liar who associates white lies to Allah SWT can live. Even though he has directed this sentence towards his opponent but nevertheless the words and ideas are his and not of his opponent. It is a clear proof of his thinking in his own words.

We leave the point to our next article what happened to Mirza after his claim of Propehthood. In the following article we are going to produce evidence of Mirza’s claims for prophethood and then deal with this quotation in that respect.  We will demonstrate Inshallah that under any of the two scenarios Mirza is proven a liar and an accursed.

Claimants of revelations in Islam

 Without wasting much time, we briefly list few Muslims who have claimed to receive revelations. To avoid debate, we produce few names which are selected from a list given in an article on Qadiani site, “Concept of Revelations in Islam”.

1- Abdul Qadir Jilani (1078 -1166) died at the age of 88, claim to have taught for over 40 years.

2- Muin-ud-din Chisti (1141- 1230) died at the age of 89.

3- Shah Wali Ullah (1703- 1762) died at the age of 59.

4- Sheik Ahmed Mujadid Alif-Thani (1564- 1624) died at the age of 60.

Above four claimed to receive the revelations according to the Qadiani official sources, they were also claimed to be “Mujadid” for different centuries. If one looks at the list of so called Mujadid then we find in 14^th century as many as 7 Mujadid are listed excluding Mirza. In 15^th century there are already 7 claimants listed, and the list is growing. We include another name in this list.

5 – Bayazid Bastami (804-874) was the first to use the term “fana fi Allah” i.e. annihilation of the self in Allah SWT and “Baqa bi Allah” i.e. Subsistence through Allah SWT. He died at the age of 70.

Bastami, was the first to use the term fana in the context of self annihilation, which has been repeated by Mirza as “Fana fil Rasool”, another hallow claim of Mirza. The reasons and purpose to briefly list these individual is to counter the claim of Mirza that he is the only one person in the Ummah to have received revelations for 23 years.

We like to put it on the record that our sole purpose is to show other claimants who claimed that they received revelations i.e. wahi from Allah SW, by producing few names from the list of the names on Qadiani’s website. It is in no way an attestation of their claims or a testimony to their truthfulness. The sole purpose here is to counter the arguments used by Mirza. This category also takes care of the claims of Mirza for those who claimed to be “Mamor min Allah SWT”.

We may in future article expose claims by Mirza that he was the only one in the Muslim Ummah to have attained to the status of a Prophet due to the quantity and quality of his Wahi. But in other places he has written that many before him have achieved the status of Prophets. Qadianis not surprisingly can not furnish name of one such claimant who has attained the status of a Prophet before or after Mirza, in the Muslims Ummah.  

We have already taken care of the quality of his Wahi in our previous articles. On the evidence it is more like concoctions, lies, deceptions and frauds rather then the quality of his Wahi.

Another interesting and vitally important point worth mentioning here; Mirza claimed it and Qadiani literature is full of this theme that Mirza appeared as Messih in the last days. He is the Mujadid of the 14^th centuary. This claims is off shot of the erroneous ideas and claims that World will be destroyed in 14^th century. On the basis of this false notion, Mirza made his claims.

Fact of the matter is that not only World is still in existence after the completion of 14^th century but also that there were numerous claimants for the title of “Mujadid” in 14^th century and even more are appearing in the 15^th century. After all they all claim the same thing. Without burdening ourselves with authenticity of their claims, it is suffice to say that the point is made by their claims that Mirza was not the last Mujadid. Qadianis should always remember it is their own claims that Allah SWT appoints Mujadid in every century. Therefore, they should abide by their own rules and standards.

Not to mention the moot point that Allah SWT at various places in the Holy Quran clearly decreed that the knowledge of the last hour remains with Him SWT alone. Mirza is proven a Kazzab on both counts, he is proven not to be the last, nor he could have knowledge of the last hour to claim he and Qadianis are “akhreen”. Lanatullah Alal Kazabeen. No one knows how long this world will last except Allah SWT according to the Holy Quran. Any one claiming to be akhreen or claiming the last days is a liar and should not be trusted for one second according to the teachings of the Holy Quran.

Biblical evidence and Tests for True Prophets

In the first quotation, Mirza claimed that all the true Prophets of Allah SWT have set up this test, he also claimed that both the Old Testament and the New Testament, i.e. the Torah and the Gospels, give testimony to this facts.

Even though it is not the main purpose of our Article, but just to demonstrate fallacy of Mirza’s claims we list few of the tests which are listed in the Bible.

1-    Deuteronomy 13 1-5 says that if a prophet or dreamer comes to you and even if his prophecies comes to pass, but if he speaks of other Gods you have not known, then you should reject him as a false prophet. Your God is testing you. That dreamer or prophet should be put to death.

Fact of the matter is Mirza did speak of Yalesh as his god; a name never heard by any Muslim, or Jews or Christians.

2-    It is quite common theme in the Old Testament that God has tested His Prophets with evil forces; for example Satan tested job in Job 1 and 2. Satan tested King David in Chronicles 21, Evil spirit testing Soul in 1 Samuel.

3-    An interesting episode is recorded in 1 Kings 22;

^“19 Then Micaiah said, “Therefore hear the word of the LORD: I saw the LORD sitting on His throne, and all the host of heaven standing by, on His right hand and on His left. ²⁰ And the LORD said, ‘Who will persuade Ahab to go up, that he may fall at Ramoth Gilead?’ So one spoke in this manner, and another spoke in that manner. ²¹ Then a spirit came forward and stood before the LORD, and said, ‘I will persuade him.’ ²² The LORD said to him, ‘In what way?’ So he said, ‘I will go out and be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets.’ And the LORD said, ‘You shall persuade him, and also prevail. Go out and do so.’ ²³ Therefore look! The LORD has put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these prophets of yours, and the LORD has declared disaster against you.”

Mirza failed to provide any reference from the Bible and Torah, but according to the above quotations, contrary to the claims by Mirza Bible does say that false Prophets would come to the world speaking of foreign Gods; they will possess lying spirit. It seems that Bible is perfectly describing people like Mirza; he off course was a liar and speaks of foreign god.

Quranic evidence for Prophet SAW- Cutting the Vein

First let’s quote and analyse the relevant verses for our readers;

The problem for Mirza and his followers is that these group of verses start with the verse which categorically state that it is dealing with Quran and not with any previous revelations, there is no question of any future revelations from God after Islam is completed and Prophet Muhammad SAW being the last Prophet of any kind whatsoever.

69:40 Behold, this [Qur’an] is indeed the [inspired] word of a noble apostle,

This verse is categorical; it is for revelations contained in the Quran and not in any other earlier book of revelations. There is no book of revelations after Quran, according to Muslim beliefs and teachings. The revelations from Allah SWT by Prophet Muhammad SAW were relayed to the believers by him SAW. In essence the Words came out from the mouth of our beloved Prophet SAW were the Words revealed to him SAW by Allah SWT. The word “Ina ho” discount any possibility that this test applied to any earlier revelations and Prophets, like we written before, there is no chance of any future Prophet after Prophet Muhammad SAW. Nevertheless this word has discounted both scenarios.

Mirza was a liar to claim that these verses are for him and other claimants of Prophethood/Messengership. Any one who does not understand “This” in English or “INA HO” in Arabic language can not be trusted.

Allah SWT in Quran then listed few examples that Quran is not poetry of a Poet, or words of a Soothsayer. To ward of any suggestions or accusations by the non-believers.

69:41 and is not – however little you may [be prepared to] believe it – the word of a poet;

69:42 and neither is it – however little you may [be prepared to] take it to heart – the word of a soothsayer:

T hen the announcement that this Holy Quran is the revelation from Allah SWT given to Prophet Muhammad SAW. But the above verse also discount possibility of any other claimant of revelations i.e. the soothsayer.

69:43 [it is] a revelation from the Sustainer of all the worlds.

Allah SWT after pronouncing that Quran is the Word of Allah SWT, then announced the penalty for Prophet Muhammad SAW if he SAW introduce anything as Word of Allah on his own accord.

69:44 Now if he [whom We have entrusted with it] had dared to attribute some [of his own] sayings unto Us,

69:45 We would indeed have seized him by his right hand,

69:46 and would indeed have cut his life-vein.

Holy Quran the Word of Allah SWT is very clear and precise in these verses. Mirza is a liar to suggest that this test applies to him.

The news given in 69:43 that it was Prophet Muhammad SAW who was in trusted to pass this divine revelation and the message contain there in to the world. And if he SAW attributed some of his own saying unto the revelations from Allah SWT (69:44) then Allah SWT would have grab him SAW with his SAW right hand and cut his SAW life-veins.

Mirza was very found to falsely and maliciously attribute to himself anything which serves his purpose. We intend to prove that Mirza lied as usual.

Furthermore, it is also very important to points out that Quran consistently have decreed that the earlier revelations to different Prophets were compromised and corrupted. Therefore, other verses on the corruption of earlier Scriptures and above verses supplement each other and point to the fact that these verses are for Quran and Prophet Muhammad SAW only and not applicable to earlier revelations or Prophets.

Mirza calling Quran Word of his mouth

There is this wide spread view amongst Muslims that Mirza has called Quran word of his mouth on the basis of the following Quotations.

Translation: Revelation (Persian): Go forth as thy time has arrived and the feet of the Muslims will be planted firmly on a strong tower. (Urdu): Muhammad the Chosen one, Chief of the Prophets. God will set all thy affairs right and will bestow upon thee all that thou desirest. The Lord of hosts will turn His attention towards this. The purpose of this sign is that the Holy Quran is the Book of God and is the word of My mouth. The gate of God’s bounties is open and His holy mercies are directed towards this. (English): The days shall come when God shall help you. Glory be to the Lord God, Maker of earth and heaven. (Braheen Ahmadiyya part IV pp. 521-522 sub footnote 3).

We have no doubt that Mirza was a Mushrik who regularly written heresies against the teachings of the Quran, but for the purpose of this article, we are of the opinion that Mirza was falsely trying to relate himself to the Quran, to allege that the Quranic revelations are for him. He has stated this at various places in his writings. In our considered opinion he wanted the share in some of the verses of the Quran including the verse 69:40 quoted above. We have maintained through out that this Kazzab always had a hidden agenda.

Conclusive Proofs from the Quran, no Prophets after Muhammad SAW

We can not resist the temptation to mention that on the same page in Braheen, Mirza mentioned verses from Surah Furqan. These verses are smacking him in the face and proving fallacy of his claims of being a Prophet after Prophet Muhammad SAW.

25:50 And, indeed, many times have We repeated [all] this unto men, so that they might take it to heart: but most men refuse to be aught but ingrate

25:51 Now had We so willed. We could have [con­tinued as before and] raised up a [separate] Warner in every single community.

25:52 hence, do not defer to [the likes and dislikes of] those who deny the truth, but strive hard against them, by means of this [divine writ], with utmost striving.

25:51 is making it crystal clear that Prophet Muhammad SAW is the last Prophet of Allah SWT and there would be no prophet of any kind after him SAW. Allah SWT has terminated the line of the Prophets after him SAW. All the concoctions Qadianis use for the meaning of “khatam-un-Nabeen” are taken care of in these verses. 25:52 consolidate Muslims beliefs that after Quran there would be no revelations from Allah SWT we have to use the arguments contained in the Holy Quran in our strives to establish the truth in this world.

Mirza’s lies of him being a Nazir or Nabi

 This quotation from the holly Quran gives us the opportunity to expose one more lie of Mirza; we produce the famous claims of Mirza from Tadkirah.

These verses also put an end to the lies of Mirza that he was a Nazir and Allah SWT would accept him even though people may reject him. In 20:51 Allah SWT decreed that He SWT will not continue the line of Prophethood and would not send any more warners (Nazir’s) in the world after Prophet Muhammad SAW. Therefore, claim by Mirza of being a Nazir is in direct conflict with a very clear decree by Allah SWT in the Holy Quran, Lanatullah Alal Kazabeen.

Dishonesty of Mirza is apparent from the words he used that he would be accepted by Allah SWT. What happened to the notion that Allah SWT appoints prophets? Mirza knew he is making a false claim that’s why he used the words that he would be accepted by Allah SWT. Not that he was appointed by Allah SWT.  That’s why he changed meaning of this alleged revelations to include Nabi for this word Nazir in the book correction of an error, and repeated it in Al-Hakam in 1889. Here Mirza is admitting that he didn’t include the second meaning of Nabi in Braheen to avoid the trouble it would have created for him. In other words he intended to fool the readers and his followers by giving the impression that he was not claiming prophethood.

Funnily enough, Mirza once again made a horrendous mistake few pages apart in the same book. He made a claim of being a Nazir; only few pages after he quoted Verses from Surah Fruqan which completely deny his claims and prove him a liar according to the Quran. It proves that Mirza was not the brightest or a knowledgeable person when it comes to Islamic teachings.

Quran says People killed True Prophets of Allah SWT

Coming back to the issue of duration  of Wahi for Prophets,  main purpose of this article, first we look at the Quranic evidence on the truthful status of some of the Prophets from the Quran.

6:85 and [upon] Zachariah, and John, and Jesus, and Elijah every one of them was of the righteous;

The verse 6:85 establishes the authenticity of Prophethood of the four Prophets mentioned by name in the Holy Quran; they were true Prophets of Allah SWT.

Now let’s read the Quranic decree which establishes without a shadow of a doubt that True Prophets of Allah SWT were indeed killed by people.

3:112 Overshadowed by ignominy are they wherever they may be, save [when they bind themselves again] in a bond with God and a bond with men; for they have earned the burden of God’s condemnation, and are overshadowed by humiliation: all this [has befallen them] because they persisted in denying the truth of God’s messages and in slaying the prophets against all right: all this, because they rebelled [against God], and persisted in transgressing the bounds of what is right.

This verse is crystal clear proof that True Prophets of Allah SWT were killed by people. Therefore, it proves that Mirza was a liar to claim that the test set out by 69:45/46 is for all the true Prophets and Messengers of Allah SWT. The test is only related to the Quran, the Word of Allah SWT and the punishment mentioned was for Prophet Muhammad SAW only, it did not apply to any earlier Prophets. No need for us to stress again and again that there are no prophets after him SAW. We have already given Quranic proofs that Allah SWT will not sent any more Warners.

Therefore, we have proven from Quranic evidence that the assertions by Mirza that the test of 23 years duration of revelations is applicable to the Messengers, Prophets and others who are appointed by Allah SWT (mamoors) is completely and utterly false. Quran says that True Prophets of Allah SWT were killed by people.

Oath of Prophets for Prophet SAW and Quran

There is other evidence available in the Holy Quran which supplements the Verse Khatam/Khatim-un-Nabian. We have already stated 25:51 in above paragraph. These verses are strengthening from the following verse in the Holy Quran, which mentions the oath taken by Allah SWT from all the earlier Prophets of Allah SWT. These Prophets have to be earlier then Prophet Muhammad SAW according to this verse, for Quran to testify to the truth already in possession and to testify and confirm the revelation already received.  

Quran can not confirm and testify for the revelations received after the completion of the Holy Quran. Thus lies and concoctions of Mirza or anyone who claims revelations and Prophethood after Prophet SAW are taken care of by Allah SWT in the Holy Quran.

In holy Quran Allah SWT has already informed us that He SWT accepted the oath from all other earlier prophets for Prophet Muhammad SAW.

3:81  AND, LO, God accepted, through the prophets, this solemn pledge [from the followers of earlier revelation]: “If, after all the revelation and the wisdom which I have vouchsafed unto you, there comes to you an apostle confirming the truth already in your possession, you must believe in him and succour him. Do you” – said He – “acknowledge and accept My bond on this condition?” They answered: “We do acknowledge it.” Said He: “Then bear witness [thereto], and I shall be your witness.

When Allah SWT has become a Witness to the oath taken by all the earlier Prophets that they and their followers must abide by The Bond of Allah SWT, accept and fulfill this condition to follow the teachings of the Holy Quran and Prophet Muhammad SAW, there is no need for any prophets of any kinds or manners. There is no need for revelations of any kind either.

This had been the Will of Allah SWT from the beginning to bestow this blessing on Prophet Muhammad SAW that after his advent all the Prophets and their followers are bound by the revelations sent to him SAW. This pledge was taken from all the Prophets by Allah SWT.

How it is possible that after the arrival of Prophet Muhammad SAW and revelation of Holy Quran, something else could either replace the Holy Quran or some one take the place of Prophet Muhammad SAW the last Prophet of Allah SWT, as Mirza try to do deceptively?

How it is possible that Quran would have included and confirmed the truth which was not even revealed yet? This verse is very clear; it decreed that Quran confirms what is already in their possession.

Is there a better Witness then Allah SWT?

We leave it there; we intend to write separately on the issue of “Khatam-un-Nabain”, Inshallah.

Evidence for the Murders of the Prophets

We proceed further to expose lies of Mirza that all the Prophets of Allah SWT have said that duration of the revelation is given to the true Prophets only and liars do not get share in this longevity for the period and duration of revelations. We produce evidence that true Prophets of Allah SWT mentioned in the Holy Quran were indeed killed some very early in their ministry.

1- John the Baptist (Yaha) AS

(born 1st century AD) Jewish prophet in Christianity as the forerunner of Jesus. Sources for his life are the four Gospels, the Acts of the Apostles, and the historian Josephus. His mother, Elizabeth, was perhaps a relative of Mary; his father was the priest Zechariah. As a young man John lived in the Judean desert, either as a hermit or as part of a Jewish monastic community such as the Essences. He attracted much public notice c. AD 28 as a prophet in the Jordan Valley. He preached the imminent wrathful judgment of God and called on his hearers to repent and be baptized. Jesus himself came to be baptized by John and shortly afterward began his own mission. John was imprisoned for criticizing the illegal marriage of Herod Antipas and was executed after Herod’s stepdaughter, Salome, demanded his head as a reward for dancing for the king’s guests.

(Britannica Concise Encyclopedia).

2- Zachariah (Zakaria) AS

Prophet Zachariah or Zakaria in Arabic was killed too; we find the evidence of his murder in the New Testament;

Mathew 23: 35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zachariah son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. (King James Version)

Luke 11:51 From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zachariah which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation. (King James Version)

We have given examples of two True Prophets of Allah SWT according to the Quranic verses produced above. Fact of the matter is that John the Baptist was killed at a very young age around 30 AD. Therefore, his death proves the point that 23 years for the duration of Prophetic revelations does not apply to earlier true Prophets of Allah SWT mentioned in the Quran.

3- ISA AS (Jesus) put on the Cross and Crucified according to Mirza

We would also like to point out albeit briefly that according to Mirza even Prophet Isa AS was put on the Cross, even though he did not die. Nevertheless according to Mirza he was near to his As death or in other words his Jugular veins (almost died) were cut but he As somehow survived. It is important to mention that according to Mirza’s logic; Prophet ISA As only preached for a brief period before he was put on the cross to die. The Bible only gives roughly 3 years duration for his As ministry. We would be glad if any Quadiani could produce any other evidence from the scriptures for continuation of Isa As ministry after 33 AD.

We know the concoctions about Isa As migration to Kashmir, which we would definitely tackle in the future, Inshallah. 

But the point here we want to make is that there is no verifiable historical evidence available that the revelations to Isa As continued after 33 AD.  We challenge the followers of Mirza to produce a single evidence with verifiable proofs that the prophetic revelations of Allah SWT to Isa As continued after this period.

In the absence of any such evidence for the continuation of Wahi to Prophet ISA as after Circa 33 AD, we are entitle to conclude that according to Mirza’s logic, nauzobillah, Allah SWT also discontinued the revelations to Prophet Isa As. He As lived to the age of 120/125 according to Mirza, but no evidence of continuation of Wahi is available to the world. We hope Qadianis desist from producing the alleged book of revelations recovered by Novotic in Tibet. This evidence could be refuted very easily; the period that alleges revelations covered is for the missing years, from the age of 12 to 30 and not after 33 AD.

Anyhow, the evidence suggests that three earlier Prophets immediately before Prophet Muhammad SAW were either killed or in the case of Prophet ISA As the plans to execute him As were hatched by the opponents. According to the evidence in the Quran he was neither killed nor crucified but according to Mirza he was placed on the cross and crucified but did not die. We leave this argument for our future article. This topic needs full attention to explore it fully. But the point is proven from the example of all three Prophets immediately before Prophet Muhammad SAW.

Other Claimants of Prophethood after Prophet Muhammad SAW

 After proving Mirza’s lies from the Quran and proving that two earlier true Prophets of Allah SWT were killed, one John the Baptist at a very young age after only few years of preaching.

We now move to prove that there were other false claimants of Prophethood who passed this test of 23 years period set out by Mirza himself.

1-    Abraham Abulafia

 He was born in Zaragoza, Spain in 1240 and died sometime after 1291 in Malta. He claimed to receive revelations with Masonic overtones at the age of 30, therefore he lasted more than 21 years after his claims, year of his actual death is not known, he may have lasted more than 23 years. He said that” men may attain to the highest aim of existence and become prophets’ not in order to work miracles and signs, but to reach the highest degree of perception and be able to penetrate intuitively into the inscrutable nature of the deity, the riddles of creation, the problems of human life, the purpose of the precepts.” This sounds very much like Mirza’s mantra of achieving the status of Prophets.

2- Jacob Frank

He was born in 1726 in Ukraine and died in 1791 at the age of 65. He claimed to be the re-incarnation of another self proclaimed messiah Sabbatai Zevi and that of King David. He created a new religion known as Frankism, a combination of Judaism and Christianity. In 1755 he started to preach the revelations in Podolia. Therefore he lived for another 31 years after he first claimed the revelations.

3- Mirza Husayn Ali –Baha

Baha was born in 1817, declared himself a Prophet in 1863; he eventually died in 1892 at the age of 75. Duration of his ministry spread over 29 years, surpassing 23 years test set out by Mirza. He claimed to have received the revelations from Allah SWT, believed in earlier Prophets. Called himself the best manifestation of God, similar to Mirza. In fact there are many similarities between him and Mirza. It is our firm believes that Mirza copied most of his concoctions from another Mirza, i.e. Baha. This once again could be explored in the future.

4- Dr Dahesh (Astonisher)

He was born in 1909 in Jerusalem, of Palestinian descend. His original name was Salim Mousa El-Achi. It is claimed by his followers that he walked on water, turn water into wine, heal the sick and raise the dead. The qualities matching exactly Isa AS (Jesus). Sage Institute of Paris awarded him an honorary doctorate in 1930. He wrote over 150 books, mostly fictions and poetry. His famous work is called “The Book of the Divine Guide and My Testament”.

It is reported that his miracles were witnessed by hundred of thousands of people from different religious groups. There is independent evidence written for his miracles. It is claimed that he was executed in Azerbaijan in 1943, but raised from the dead and died his natural death in 1984 in New York City.

In essence according to his follower’s claims he has fulfilled all the conditions of re-incarnation of Jesus. On the basis of his followers claims he is the one which surely should be accepted as a re-incarnated or second coming of Jesus.

Funny enough, his supporters use the same arguments used by the Quadianis that ISA As would not return bodily from heaven, but someone would be his re-incarnation, Masil, Barooz, etc etc. If one to believe such concept then he is more suited then any of the so called, re-incarnated Jesus.

He was a Christian, he never claimed Prophethood , but called himself to be a “Divine Guide”. In other words he claimed to have received the revelations too. Therefore, he fulfilled the criterion set out by Mirza. He made claim of receiving divine guidance in and around 1942, he was exiled from Lebanon, his nationality was revoked. But later Government of Lebanon re-instated his nationality. Even if we discount the legend of him being died and resurrected in Azerbaijan and take his actual death in 1984. He lived 44 years after making his claims. (Information obtained from the official site)

Let’s quote some paragraphs from the post of a follower of Dahesh using the ID “Mario”. This person claimed he knew Dr. Dahesh and was closed to him. It is an interesting read for the Quadianis. This individual is actually quoting from the book(s) of Dr. Dahesh.

According to what Dr. Dahesh wrote in part 3 of Strange Tales and Wondrous Legends he tells of a dream in which he visits the planet of the prophets (this is a long story and I am greatly summarizing here) where in one scene, he sees all the “great” prophets (and he names some of them: “and here was our Lord Christ and he was conversing with Moses and Elijah and Joshua and the prophet Solomon and his father prophet David and Abraham…” he also mentions prophet Daniel who was unjustly thrown in the lions’ pit…(exactly like Mirza he has claimed to meet the Prophets in the state of wakefulness)

The Doctor then writes that from their conversation he knew they were ALL ONE PERSON of multiple (spiritual) Fluids (Sounds familiar, Mirza claimed to be from that fluid too).

“And each prophet among them is a fluid from the main person, and that prophet brought his fluids to different levels (ranks) ranging in elevation (high ranking as well as low ranking) based on his actions; and they all visited Planet Earth at different times and under different names, whereas the truth is that they are all one prophet sent to the Earth to establish a religion that is compatible with the (spiritual) fluids of the the inhabitants that happen to live during the era during which (the prophet) materializes on Earth” (This is perhaps not an eloquent translation, but you can vouch for the content as far as its meaning)

Then Christ expresses his disappointment in humanity… and he quite literally says that only a very few number of people actually believed in his message (that their number was so little one could even count using one’s fingers… so, we’re talking 10 maximum!?)

Then Christ declares that one of his fluids had materialized in INDIA in the name of GANDHI his fate was murder at the hand of “Judas” who was HIMSELF the same JUDAS who could not shake his old ways… In other words, the fluid that sold Jesus would materialize in India and assassinate Mahatma Gandhi.

And Christ declares that the murder of GANDHI was a great insult which meant that the people of Earth do not deserve a prophet among them at all.
Furthermore that his murder is a horrific shame that has shackled the neck of humanity … and proves that the inferno is a more suitable place for them, and that a thing is attracted to its “mettle” and their “mettle” is “evil” …

Then Christ says to the prophets: “I am speaking with you my (spiritual) Fluids gathered here, now, in the names of different Prophets, but you are none other than ME, in other words, you were sent from MY FLUIDS and landed on Earth to COMPLETE THE HEAVENLY MISSION. And that is why I said to the Jews ‘I came to continue and not to destroy,’ and that is recorded in the gospels of my disciples who have recorded my words and my examples. And is it possible that I destroy what I HAVE BUILT during my prior and successive lives?”

Christ then mentions that had he said : ” I am the one who built all these teachings that came through the mouths of Ezekiel, Jeremiah, and Joshua… etc… because I myself am called by all these numerous names they WOULD HAVE STONED ME. “

That’s when Christ declares that he followed the common piece of wisdom which said “speak to people according to their level of understanding.” and that’s why he spoke using SYMBOLS whose meanings would be made clear in due time.

We hope Quadianis may realize that he is no different from Mirza, his claims are based as much on fantasy as was Mirza’s. We leave it here and move on.

5- Marshal Applewhite

He also claimed to be a Messiah. According to the Wikipedia He claimed to be the re-incarnation of Jesus in 1975 and died in 1997. Therefore he successfully passed the test Mirza claimed to be the yard stick to accept someone’s claims of Prophethood or recipient of divine revelations.

6- Sun Myung Moon

Once again we are going to quote paragraphs from Wiki to establish the dates of his claims to demonstrate he successfully passed the test as well.

He was born in 1920 in Korea. On April 17, 1935, when he was 16 (in Korean age reckoning), Moon says he had a vision or revelation of Jesus while praying atop a small mountain. He says that Jesus asked him to complete the unfinished task of establishing God’s kingdom on Earth and bring peace to the world.

He is still alive, therefore, according to the test he should be a true claimant too.

7- Muhammad Jaunpuri

Born 19 September 1443, died 23^rd April 1505 at the age of 62. At the age of 40 he claimed to be a Prophet of God and Promised Mehdi.  In 1496 he performed Hajj and declared himself as Mahdi, but was ignored by the religious scholars and Ulemas in Mecca.

He petty much fulfilled the criterion too, his name was Muhammad, and he claimed to be the progeny of Hadarat Hussain RA. He still has followers in India.

He at least fulfilled two criterion better then Mirza. His name was actually Muhammad and not Ghulam-e-Ahmed like Mirza, secondly he performed the Hajj, which according to some Hadiths traditions will be performed by the Mehdi. The Hajj also eluded Mirza.

8- Yahweh ben Yahweh

 Born as Hulon Mitchell Jr in 1935, died in 2007 from prostate cancer. Wiki wrties;

The Nation of Yahweh set up its headquarters in Liberty City, Florida. Yahweh ben      Yahweh emphasized that God and all the prophets of the Bible were black and blacks would gain the knowledge of their true history through him. He also emphasized whites and particularly Jews as infidels and oppressors. Lastly he emphasized loyalty to himself as the son of God YHWH.

Here we have another son of God that was involved in murders and was sentenced for these crimes. But funny enough he also had a long life and died at the age of 72 by natural causes.

9- Aleister Crowley

Born in 1875 died 1947, in 1904 started a new religion/religious dogma called “Thelema”.

Thelema is the mystical cosmology Crowley announced in 1904 and expanded upon for the remainder of his life. The diversity of his writings illustrates his difficulty in classifying Thelema from any one vantage. It can be considered a form of religious traditionalism, humanistic positivism and/or an elitist meritocracy.

He died of respiratory infection on 1 December 1947. He had become addicted to the Heroin. He and his doctor died within 24 hours of each other. His supports claims that his Doctor refused to continue his prescription and Crawley put a curse on him. (WIKI)

Any how he passed the test too. It seems that Mirza was in the good company of drug addicts, murderers and embezzlers. Irony for Mirza’s follower is that Mirza was a drug addict according to the evidence displayed earlier. His own followers have leveled charges of embezzlement against him, this we intend to explore in the future. There also had been suspicions and accusations made against Mirza for his involvement in the murders of his opponent.

10- Wallace Fard Muhammad

Then there is Wallace Fard Muhammad another claimant of divinity, whose life from his birth, his origins, his disappearance, his death are all surrounded by mystery. Believed to be born in 1893, place of birth is from New Zealand to Portland, Oregon. Founder of NOI. He disappeared in 1934.But there is evidence that he lived until 1960s. Zafar Ansari a Pakistani Journalist claimed that he was identical with Muhammad Abdullah, a Pakistani Qadiani who had been advisor of Elijah Muhammad since late 1950’s. He had been showed in the 26 November 1976 issue of NOI journal. (WIKI)

Anyhow this was another Messiah and claimant of divinity. It is alleged that he was involved in many criminal activities. It is a known fact that whole of his life is full of mystery. But it seems he has pass the test set out by Mirza, if evidence for him to be alive until 1960 is accurate. This is what FBI files say on Fard.

“Wallace Fard was born 1891 in New Zealand. He was the founder of the Black Muslim sect, “Lost-Found Nation of Islam in North America”. Fard arrived in the United States in 1913, settling briefly in Portland, Oregon. He was arrested in 1918 for violation of the Woolwine Act (California prohibition law) and in 1926, for the violation of the State Poison Act (sale of narcotics) and was sentenced to San Quentin. After his release from prison in 1929, he went to Chicago, then on to Detroit as a silk peddler. In 1934, Fard left Detroit and was never heard from again. A San Francisco newspaper article written in 1963 exposed Fard as an enterprising racketeering fake.

In this list we deliberately included modern claimants to prophethood, messiah, to facilitate our arguments on the longevity of their life after their claims. There were many other famous claimants like Ibu Isa Al-Isfhani, David Alroy in the past.

To avoid bias most of the information is obtained from WIKI, which is based on common knowledge and freely available to everyone.

Mirza failed his own test

After giving examples from the Quran that People did killed true Prophets of Allah SWT. Historical and Biblical evidence outside of the Quran that true Prophets mentioned in the Holy Quran were killed well within the period for the duration of revelations to Prophet Muhammad SAW. We now present internal evidence from this cult’s sources that Mirza failed even the test mentioned in the Quran; he says is applicable to him too. Quranic Verse states;

69:44 Now if he [whom We have entrusted with it] had dared to attribute some [of his own] sayings unto Us.

Therefore the test was set for Prophet Muhammad SAW that if he SAW attribute some of his own sayings unto Allah SWT. Did Mirza passed that test? Let’s see the evidence.

Evidence from tadkirah suggest that even just over a year before his death, Mirza was attributing to Allah SWT words which he himself admits he could not remember.

Mr. Zafrullah translated it as;

There were some preliminary words of the revelation but they have escaped my memory. Their purport was the same as that of the revelation (Al-Hakam, Vol. XI, No. 12, April 10, 1907, p. 1).”

The evidence is there in black and white, Mirza admitted that he couldn’t remember the exact words of the revelations. Therefore he used his own words.

This is the exact test and conditions set out by Quran 69:44 which Mirza failed in his own words and recorded in the sources of this cult, what other better evidence Quadianis want? Mirza knew very well this test did not apply to him. He has written it in very unambiguous terms when addressing it as an allegation against his opponent.

But it does not stop here, there are numerous such examples, we include few for our readers.

Another proof that Mirza included his own words to the allege revelations. This happened to be the Divine command to the Angels, but alas, the fake prophet couldn’t remember it, so he decided to add his own words to it.  So what is the test Mirza says apply to him too?

There are similar incidents in tadkirah for example on 18 October 1902 and on 24 September 1906; on both occasions Mirza admitted that he couldn’t remember the alleged ilhams.

This is another example, Mirza did not remember what number was written on the forehead but he included it as revelations from God. He writes in Urdu 5,6 or 7, but Mr. Zafrullah realizing stupidity of Mirza didn’t write number 6 in the English translations. He wanted to save Mirza from humiliations and ridicule thinking that Western audience may pick on this absurdity that if 6 was written then why rub it and re-write number 6 on her forehead? Anyhow, this is another example Mirza using his own conjecture for the alleged Word of Allah SWT.

“ Molvi Sher Ali stated; Maseeh-e-Maoud (Mirza) said all our Arabic writings are kind of revelations. Because they are written after special attestation/approval by Khuda (Allah SWT). He (Mirza) said, some time I write words or sentences but do not know the meanings of them. After writing I check them with the dictionary (Mirza giving away the secrets of his Arabic mastery here) then I find out the meanings. Further Molvi (Sher Ali) said, that Hadarat use to send his Arabic books and writings for proof readings to First Ka-Lip and Molvi Muhammad Ahsan, with instructions to perform corrections if needed. The Ka-Lip I used to return them after reading, but Molvi Muhammad Ahsan used to change some words for corrections. Molvi Sher Ali said; Hadarat Maseeh-e-Maoud once said, that even though Molvi Muhammad Ahsan corrects the words but I (Mirza) feel that my word(s) are better suited for the narrations and also more stronger, and Molvis word(s) are weak, but at times I leave his words; to avoid him the disappointment that I removed all his words.”

In our last article on the death of his brother we listed some English ilhams. The translator of tadkraih Zafarullah also played with the alleged words of God and changed the sentences in his English tadkirah to save Mirza humiliations. Here are few examples of these corrections for December 1883 ilhams produced in our previous article.

These are proofs that Mirza let human words mixed with his revelations and allegedly inspired words by God. Mirza written English words in Roman Urdu (this is another classic and a first for any Prophet).

“Though all men should be angry but God is with you, He shall help you, words of God not can exchange.”

This revelation is written by Zafarullah as;

Though all men should be angry yet God is with you. He shall help you. Words of God do not exchange.”

Therefore, even the followers find it bizarre to leave the English ilhams unchanged, written in Urglish (Urdu/English) by Mirza, allegedly revealed by God. Zafrullah decided to correct Mirza’s God errors by changing from Words of God not can exchange to Words of God do not exchange and also used yet instead of but.  Another alleged revelations to Mirza

“you have to go Amritsar” change to “you have to go to Amritsar” by Zafarullah.

Another proof can be given from above quoted alleged ilhams from Tadkirah Words of Mirza’s mouth. Once again Zafrullah changed the Ilhams of Mirza, alleged Word of God revealed to Mirza. Mirza writes;

” Glory be to this Lord God maker of Earth and Heaven.” Zafrullah translated it as “Glory be to the Lord God”.

Therefore he corrected another blunder of Mirza; we should say the blunders of Mirza’s god.

We asked why change the proudly revealed alleged English ilhams by Allah SWT? Did Allah SWT made grammatical errors (nauzobillah)? Who gave Zafarullah the rights to change the Word of God? How he can translate English in to English and change it?

Pointing to grammatical mistakes is not our intention here; we just want to demonstrate that alleged revelations to Mirza by Allah SWT were changed by the followers too. It proves the point perfectly that Zafrullah knew very well that these are not revelations from God but bad attempts by Mirza to impress uneducated people around him. Also in the translations Zafarullah admitted that Mirza wrote “I am not sure of the sequence”.  This is another proof of interference by Mirza with the alleged Word of God. If you can not remember the sequence then how can you claim it is the exact revelations from God?

We can give more examples of these changes from this cult’s own resources. But the proofs displayed above are enough evidence that Mirza did change the alleged Words of Allah SWT.

A la Carte revelation

In previous articles we have disclosed the secrets of Mirza’s ilhams in different languages. There is a definite pattern in the concoctions of Mirza and his claims. Here his follower Muhammad Sadiq is asking for permission to learn German.

“Few days ago I have seen it in the dream, I am going with you (Mirza), you are dressed in white outfit, your name is Alexander Balitoure and it is my understanding that it is a German word, its meaning is “Sadiq”. Then in dreams it was revealed that it meaning is “Messiah”. Therefore, if you order I shall start learning German language? “M Sadiq 19 March 1903

Mirza replied;

“It seems from these dreams that there is no permission. It is better to wait unless the reality of German is revealed. Do you know if there is an Arabic newspaper published from Germany, like the Arabic newspaper published from America? We have to find another means of publications.”

Thank God Sadiq didn’t start to learn German language. We all are to read German ilhams from Yalesh. Anyhow this evidence proves that Mirza and his crooked followers were keen to fool the unsuspected people. The easy prays who could be gullible to accept this kind of crap. M Sadiq would learn the language and then pass on the knowledge to Mirza with some helpful books to teach how to make very short basic sentences and voila, ilhams ala carte are ready for the consumptions of the followers. Exactly the practice adopted by Mirza for the English ilhams. The disastrous results are there for all to observe.

Conclusions

In this article we tried to cover substantial grounds from the fact that true Prophets of Allah SWT never make mistakes in the matter of beliefs to the conditions set out by the Holy Quran that Prophets are truthful first and foremost.

After establishing the Quranic evidence for the truthfulness of the True Prophets of Allah SWT, we explore the claim of Mirza on the basis of his writings that the test set out in the Quran for Prophet Muhammad SAW applies to him too, and on the basis of this test he should be accepted as a true Prophet of Allah SWT.

We have proven first and foremost that the test set out in the Quran was for Prophet Muhammad SAW only, and it does not apply to the earlier Prophets either. Examples of Yaha AS and Zakaria As were given, even though they were true Prophets of Allah SWT mentioned in the Holy Quran, but they still were killed by their enemies. In the case of Yaha AS he died at a very young age after only couple of years of preaching. According to Mirza’s claims and logic even Prophet ISA AS (nuazobillah) also failed this test, because he was put on the cross, but did not die according to Mirza.

After establishing the example of three of the earlier Prophets, just before the advent of Prophet Muhammad, we then shown examples after examples of other claimants of Prophethood and revelations who fulfilled the criterion set by Mirza for the truthfulness of a claimant. We are certain that Quadianis, wouldn’t accept any of these claimants as true Prophets or Messiahs. Why they complain if Mirza is considered a liar by Muslims like all these people mentioned; they are declared as heretical liars?

Then we have given proofs that according to the cult’s sources including the writings of Mirza; alleged revelations were changed. The internal records bear testimony to this fact.

It seems Mirza despite his concoctions to attribute the Quranic verses to himself still could not qualify as a Prophet. He was a habitual liar who concocted Ilhams and attributed white lies to Allah SWT. He fails the test of “Sadiqeen” set by Allah SWT in the Holy Quran for true Prophets.

It should be no surprise to any Quadiani that he fits the bill and sit very comfortably with some of the known criminals who have claimed divine revelations, Prophethood and being a Messiah.

In the process we have also shown that Mirza made another blunder to include the verses from the Quran which categorically decreed that Allah SWT has indeed terminated his Will and Practice to send further prophets after Muhammad SAW. He made the claim of being a “Nazir” which subsequently changed to being a “Nabi” few pages apart from the quotation of these verses.

In the end it is befitting to include this verse from Surah An’am;

6:93 And who could be more wicked than he who invents a lie about God, or says, “This has been revealed unto me,” the while nothing has been revealed to him? – or he who says, “I, too, can bestow from on high the like of what God has bestowed”?  If thou couldst but see [how it will be] when these evildoers find themselves in the agonies of death, and the angels stretch forth their hands [and call]: “Give up your souls! Today you shall be requited with the suffering of humiliation for having attributed to God something that is not true, and for having persistently scorned His messages in your arrogance!”

This verse specified both aspects used by false claimants, in the first instance it decreed that lies attributed as revelations and in second instance it is referring to the descend of Holy Quran bestowed from on high on Prophet Muhammad SAW. The false claimants when attributing these lies try to create the revelations in like wise manner, as were bestowed on the true Prophets.

We produce one of the last uttering of Mirza to his second wife;

“Due to weakness he fall down on the bed and hit his head against the wood; his condition worsened on this I (wife of Mirza) said “O’ Allah (SWT) what is happening?” he (Mirza) replied “it is (happening) what I warned about/used to say”. I asked (Son of Mirza) from mother, did you understood, what he (Mirza) meant? She said “yes”.

Mirza’s son has given a long explanation of this quote in his book “Sirah-tul-Mehdi” but it is just plain and simple a damage control exercise by him. Death is a reality; there is no mystery in death. Mirza knew one day he will die, so did his wife. Here they were not talking about his death, but him being a liar all his life seeing the angel of death, as described in the Holy Quran.

In our future article we will present the evidence and arguments for the other side of the coin that when Mirza claimed the Prophethood and what happened to him after his claims of Prophethood, did he passed this test?

All rights reserved © 2009

Preface

We exposed Mirza’s prophecies for the death of his Father and Brother in details. The evidence produced by us proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that Mirza concocted the dates and timing of the Prophecies well after the events. Clear cut proofs of his falsehood. These discrepancies were researched by us to show that Mirza’s prophecies were wrong on factual grounds, giving no chance for the followers of Mirza to refute the evidence produced. They are in the habits of twisting the words and using far fetched explanations for the absurdities of Mirza. But in the case of factual errors in so called revelations of Mirza there is no room left for maneuver.

Most important aspect of it is that it not only proves that Mirza lied and concocted his prophecies, but also that he attributed these lies to Allah SWT. Quadianis otherwise have to explain how Allah SWT (nauzobillah) got the actual dates of these events wrong in the ilhams Mirza claimed he received from Allah SWT.

Mirza claimed Allah SWT corrects his mistakes

Before we start presenting more evidence it is worth pointing to a very bold statement made by Mirza in his book Nur-ul-Haq.

Mirza writes; God never leaves me with mistakes (or forgetting); even for a blink of an eye, He (SWT) also protects me from every mistake and from the satanic touch.

The Arabic words used in this quotation are “Min as-saho (mistakes) Wa Nasian (bad memory/forgetfulness)” meaning either the mistakes or forgetting something or not having accurate memory of an event. Therefore, according to this quotation, Mirza should not be forgetting something revealed to him by Allah SWT. There should be no excuse for him to forget the dates and years of different incidents in his life which he attributed to Allah SWT by claiming them as Divine revelations.

In the presence of such a bold statement it is imperative that the person who made such statement should be clear of all mistakes in the matter of faith and in his alleged revelations, and should be able to prove that his mistakes were corrected by God, immediately.

Actual Source of the years of death

Before we introduce and examine further evidence for the death of his brother, we introduce the actual source for the years of death of his brother and father. This source is responsible for the subsequent corrections carried out by the cult, in the compilation and translation of Tadkirah, the alleged divine book of Quadianis.

Ghulam Murtaza who was a competent Hakim, died in 1876, his son Ghulam Qadir was selected as his successor. Ghulam Qadir was always willing and ready to help the local administration. He received various certificates from the local administrators. He for a period worked as Superintendent of the Local District office. His only son died in his childhood. He adopted his nephew Sultan Ahmed. He (Sultan Ahmed) is considered as the elder of the family after the death of Ghulam Qadir in 1883. Mirza Sultan Ahmed started his job with the Government as Assistant Tehsildar; he now works as Extra Assistant. He is also the administrator (numberdar) of Qadian. Brother of Nizamdin, Imamdin died in 1904, at the time of the siege of Delhi, he was a Risaldar in the Hudson Horse Cavalry. His father Ghulam Mohiudin was a Tehsildar.

This paragraph from the book “Chiefs of Punjab” by Griffin provides the insight and the reasons, why all those after the events corrections were carried out by the cult. Why the compilers and translator of Tadkirah fraudulently either introduced the dates and years to the revelations of Mirza when there was no year mentioned in the actual writings. Or they changed the year of these prophecies where Mirza stupidly introduced wrong years in his so called prophecies. Proof of this from the footnote of one of the prophecy was introduced in our previous article.

Mirza and English Ilhams

Before we discuss the ilhams of November and December 1883, it is our pleasure to introduce a slightly earlier letter to Mir Abbas; this letter has an interesting paragraph. This paragraph is amazing in two senses. First it gives a hilarious example; how this alleged Prophet of “True Islam” asking a Hindu boy in Quadian to check the accuracy of Mirza’s English ilhams before they are sent to the printing press.

Some English sentences were revealed as ilhams, I have sent them to the printing press. There is no one here who knows English, a Hindu boy of Quaidan, studying in Lahore has seen (checked their accuracy) them.

Quranic evidence suggests that Allah SWT decreed that HE has given Quran to Prophet Muhammad SAW in Arabic, his SAW own language so it would be easier for him SAW to understand it and that he SAW can easily convey the glad tidings contains therein, for the benefit of the humanity.

But alas, this self proclaimed false prophet needed a Hindu Boy to check the ilhams for their accuracy before they are sent to the printing press.

Second very interesting side to this bizarre practice by Mirza is that why did he need someone to check the accuracy of the English revelations? Was he expecting some errors in the Word of God (nauzobillah)?

Mirza’s obsession with English Language

We displayed the evidence that Allah SWT decreed to Prophet Muhammad SAW that the Quran is revealed in his SAW own language so he SAW can convey the glad tidings to the God-conscious people.

Mirza made lofty claims about his command of Arabic, which we have every intention to test in the future, but he also was very keen to learn English language.

It is stated by Molvi Sher Ali that Hadarat Messih-e-Maoud once said, I thought I need to learn English for the purpose of tableeq; I am confident that Allah SWT would bestow the knowledge (of English), I just have to pray for a night or two. But then I thought Molvi Muhammad Ali is engaged in (tableeq) this work, his English is praised by others, therefore, my attention was shifted from this (learning English).

It seems this alleged Prophet sub-contracted the work of preaching and spreading the messages he alleged received from his god yalesh, in English to Mohammad Ali.

But what happened, why he needed someone to check his alleged ilhams, supposed Word of Allah SWT (nauzobillah) for accuracy? Why he didn’t learn the English by praying for a night or two? Why Allah SWT didn’t teach English to Mirza after his prayers? Were his prayers turn down by Allah SWT that he has to resort to request a Hindu boy for corrections, for translation and understanding?

We have already presented evidence in our article “Mirza’s attacks on Prophet Isa As” that Mirza thanked his follower for his help in learning English and wanted his help in Hebrew language too. Mirza actually spelled out his novel way to concoct ilhams in different languages and present them as alleged Revelations from God. Mirza wanted to learn how to join the words and make little sentences. This heretic really used the concept of revelations from God as a Child’s play.

There is a subsequent letter to the same person, Mirza writes;

We have another need; I find it difficult to recognize separate/broken words of English. I want a copy which has separate/broken words listed against the words from the book.

Once again a clear cut proof that this heretic wanted to fool the world to create English ilhams, by producing short sentences combining different words. The idiot forgot that in English grammar also plays an important part.

The result is there for all of us to observe, in the shape of woefully crafted English ilhams by Mirza. Ironically, Mirza in his efforts to claim them as divinely revealed ilhams; ended up attributing something to Allah SWT which was erroneous (nauzobillah). This thought can never cross a Muslim’s mind.

No wonder he had been asking help for the accuracy and translations of his so called English revelations, he could copy the words from the books but did not understand the meanings of all the words, never mind the grammar and construction of the sentences. He in his desperation even concocted that some of the ilhams were translated by God. What an absurd idea.

We move along to our main objective.

Death of his Brother, absurdities continue

We in our previous articles established with out shadow of any doubt that Mirza in his books claimed that his brother Ghulam Qadir died in 1887 four years after his actual death in 1883 according to the footnote in Tadkirah.

We also exposed compilers, sons of Mirza and translator of Tadkirah, Mr. Zafrullah Khan.To demonstrate that how they conspired in the compilation of Tadkirah to correct the blunders committed by Mirza on the dates of these Prophecies.

More we investigate more blunders we find in the writings of Mirza. These blunders prove without shadow of any doubts that Mirza was a liar and a fraudster, who tried to claim these prophecies years after the events. But in his stupidity he committed blunders after blunders and ruined his credibility and of those who have compiled and translated Tadkirah as the divine book containing the divine revelations to Mirza.

Brother died in 1881

After announcing his brother’s death in 1887 four years after Ghulam Qadir’s actual death, Mirza in the same book only few pages down from the first quote committed another blunder. Before we expose that blunder let’s test the credibility of “Tadkirah” the divine book again.

Therefore, according to the compilers and translator of tadkirah, Mirza prophecies death of his brother in 1883. Our readers by now are well aware, why this year 1883 is artificially selected by the compilers of tadkirah.

Now we examine the evidence from “Nazool-ul-Masih”; above quote in tadkirah is listed as prophecy number 103;

Once again, clear evidence of fraud by the compilers and translator of tadkirah; Mirza writes this prophecy was told in 1881 and fulfilled the next day. Dear readers, we have come full circle on the issue of death of Mirza’s brother. Mirza have written his brother’s year of death 1881 and 1887. One is two years before the actual death and the other four years after his actual death, according to the evidence displayed.

Irony for the followers of this cult is that Mirza committed these blunders in the same book; just few pages apart.

Further investigation on the death of Mirza’s brother

1- Ilham preceding the illhams for the death

We find something very interesting which shows how desperate this cult was to show and establish credibility of Mirza. They tried that all the alleged ilhams should show 1883 the year of Ghulam Qadir’s death; no matter what the actual evidence is in the writings of Mirza In tadkirah all the ilhams for the death of Ghulam Qadir are listed after following ilham.

Mirza had this ilham at the end of (20th) November 1883; next ilham in Tadkirah is in December on the basis of a letter to Abbas dated 12 December 1883. But the ilham according to the letter were received by Mirza during the week before 12th December. Between these two sets of ilhams, the compilers of Tadkirah have squeezed all the ilhams for the death of his brother. There is only a window of few days available between these two ilhams.

Therefore, brother of Mirza should have died sometime between 20 November 1883, and first week/ start of December.1883.

Curiously in the above quotation Mirza does not think this ilham is for his brother.

Why if his brother was still alive? Especially if the Arabic ilham quoted had the word “Akhi” i.e. brother in it. Why then Mirza never thought that this ilham could be for the death of his actual brother? Even though according to the presentation in Tadkirah, his brother was still alive at the time of this ilham. It is rather odd indeed. When we looked at the original evidence we find something more interesting. The whole of the letter is not included in the tadkirah as ilham; we introduce the last portion of the letter which contains a really interesting paragraph.

2- Original evidence for above ilham

Some part of this quote is included in the translation provided from tadkirah. We translate the remaining portion. Mirza writes;

“My principle is that we should live according to the will of Our Sustainer, whatever He (SWT) Will is better, because He (SWT) is the Dispenser of the grace/affairs. I intend to have a short visit to your town, but this desire wouldn’t be fulfill without the Will of Khuda Talla (Allah SWT). Molvi Abdul Qadir should remember his death, and try to purify his heart, I will also try. (20^th November 1883).

Mirza here is advising Molvi Abdul Qadir to pray to Allah for purity of his heart and remember his death. This sentence sound very familiar indeed.

The date of this letter is 20 November 1883. There is no mention of ilhams concerning his brother in this letter. Also there is no mention that Mirza was in Amritsar at the time he writes this letter.

3-     Evidence displayed in previous Article

We have already dealt with the fraud and deceptions by the compilers of tadkirah regarding the dates in the original writings of Mirza on the evidence reproduced. The purpose to reproduce this evidence is to completely destroy the credibility of Mirza and those who were responsible for composition and translation of tadkirah.

In this ilham Mirza said that his brother died few weeks after the ilham.

The ilhams in Tadkirah are listed in order of the dates. Next ilham quoted in tadkirah after the death of Ghulam Qadir, is the letter to Mir Abbas written on 12 December 1883, but this letter covers the period of a week  in Mirza’s own words. Therefore if we minus a week from 12 December, for the period in which Mirza received these ilhams, then we are left with a window of few days, between the ilhams before and after the ilhams for the death prophecy. His brother must have died in this period; if we go with the chronology in the Tadkirah.

December 1883 Ilham

As it is evident, even though according to the chronology in tadkirah, Ghulam Qadir is dead, on some day between 20 November and 12 December 1883, more like before 5^th of December, as explained above. But Mirza had nothing to say about his brother either about the ilhams he received for his death or his actual death, strange indeed.

Another interesting fact; an ilham which Mirza receive in the first week of December 1883 states; Allah SWT has asked Mirza to go to Amritsar. But according to the evidence repeated in this article, Mirza says he was already in Amritsar when he wrote a letter to his brother informing him of his approaching death, Ghulam Qadir died few weeks afterwards. Unfortunately for this cult according to their chronology Ghulam Qadir is already dead, while Mirza is still in Quadian.

Now we display the remaining part of this letter from the original source.

Mirza writes; This week I received some English ilhams, about some (ilhams) I enquired from the Hindu boy but it is not satisfactory, some were revealed with translation from Allah SWT, some were in Hebrew, these (ilhams) needed research.

In the last paragraph Mirza writes

Please convey my Salam to Molvi Abdul Qadir and Khwaja Ali.

It is abundantly clear that Molvi Abdul Qadir was still alive, after the death of Ghualm Qadir according to the chronology in tadkirah.

Before we move on, we like to point out dishonesty of the compilers of Tadkirah; they left out any mention of Hindu Boy from the Tadkirah.

It also proven that the ilham which says that his brother died few weeks after Mirza wrote the letter is not correct. The evidence and time line is completely against the concoctions and lies of Mirza and the fraud and deceptions of the cult.

Died after few weeks do not fit in the equation, there was hardly few days window available, between the two batches of ilhams produced in tadkirah, before and after the alleged death of Ghulam Qadir.

After careful examination of the internal evidence it is quite obvious that Mirza did not receive any ilhams for the death of his brother between the period from 20 November 1883 and the first week of December 1883. How could it be possible for a man who is writing even the silliest things in his letters to be completely silent on such significant incident as death of his nearest and dearest brother?

It is quite obvious that this cult does not have any such evidence available to them with the dates which can absolve Mirza. Otherwise that evidence would have been proudly displayed in tadkirah and many other places. But lack of any such evidence whatsoever, tells its own story.

During the period between end of 1882 and start of 1884 Mirza regularly wrote letters to Mir Abbas, almost on fortnightly basis, a thorough search of this material produce no evidence that Mirza mentioned his brother’s death at all.

A careful look at tadkirah is enough to reveal to the readers that vast majority of the ilhams for the year 1883, were taken from the letters Mirza wrote to Mir Abbas. These ilhams contain very small, insignificant and minute matters. But during all this period there is no evidence produced in tadkirah whatsoever from this source for the death of Ghulam Qadir.

This proves beyond any shadow of doubt, that Mirza wrote all these prophetic ilhams for the death of his brother, years after the events. This is quite clear from the blunders he has committed to give wide ranging years of his brother’s death.  But surprisingly, he failed to mention this important incident to a follower whom he was writing regularly and frequently during whole of 1883.

Another funny aspect is that the Prophet who supposedly has been selected to convey the message to the Muslims (“true Islam” according to the concoctions by Mirza and the Cult) by Allah SWT, has to ask a Hindu boy to check the accuracy and translate the ilhams, then says he is not satisfied and request his follower to look at them. Even funnier is Mirza’s claim that Allah SWT (nauzobillah) has translated some of the ilhams for him.

We are entitled to ask from Quadianis;

1-     Why not disclose the ilhams in the language Mirza understands in the first place? Was Allah SWT (nauzobillah) try to impress someone here, with English?

2-     Why Allah SWT (nauzobillah) translated only some of the ilhams why not all of them?

3-     Why these ilhams contain errors? god of Mirza was also learning English, at the time of these ilhams?

4-     If so then why his god sends ilhams in English?

5-     What happened to the Islamic concept of All Knowing; All Powerful God?

Mirza raising the dead

Just to add insult to the injury, we produce another master piece from Mirza.

Mirza despite ridiculing Prophet ISA As was very keen to prove that he has been given same miracles like Isa As. We have already covered this in our previous article. We present the evidence on Mirza raising the dead; in this case, as was earlier, it is about his son Mubarak Ahmed. He made various prophecies, claims, explanations and taweels for the earlier claims which obviously proven bogus like usual, further claims to hide the embarrassment. But here we are producing a very clear evidence of his stupidity.

Mirza writes; once I received the revelations “Oh my God please show me how you can raise the dead, and show us Your Mercy and Blessing from the heavens.” In this ilham I received the news that there may be occasions when we have to use this prayer and it would be accepted. Thus it happened once my son Mubarak Ahmed was seriously ill, everyone said he died. I got up and started to move my hand on his head while praying; he started to breath again. This ilham is also fulfilled in another way because Allah SWT has given life to thousands of spiritually dead from our hands.

This way Mirza the incredible wanted to prove that he could raise the dead, as is written in the Holy Quran for Prophet Isa As.

But Mirza made one huge blunder on this prophecy too. In the side columns he has written that this Prophetic ilham was received in 1901 but the fulfillment of this prophecy is listed as 1900. Thus Mirza is trying to say that this Prophecy was fulfilled before it was revealed to Mirza. Bravo Mirza then how this would be foretelling? Before followers of Mirza jump up again, they should consider the title Mirza has given to this incident he writes; “Prophecy 120” the word he used in Urdu is “pashgoai” meaning foretelling of an event, or Prophecy in other words.

Construction of the paragraph makes it impossible for his followers to twist it, as is their habit. The “Sultan of Pen” has written this way most of his life. But we are not complaining. It is making our job easier; he is proving himself a liar, from his own writings.

Conclusions

We have proven once again that Mirza was a liar and he committed fraud to make himself look credible to his followers. He never had any revelations for the death of his brother. He surprisingly and oddly failed to mention a single word either on the ilhams concerning his brother’s death or actual death to his follower. This is impossible if we to consider the dates written on the letters are correct and no other unsavory practice is adopted by the cult on the dates and authenticity of these letters.

There should be absolutely no doubt in anyone’s mind that Mirza wrote these alleged ilhams years after the events, no wonder he couldn’t remember exact dates or years for these momentous incidents in his life. It is very obvious that he tried to claim for his brother’s death the advice he gave to Molvi Abdul Qadir in his letters to Mir Abbass.

We tried our best to locate his letter to Ghulam Qadir, but found no traces of it in various Quadiani sources. We would be glad if someone can produce this evidence, provided its date and contents could be authenticated to belong to 1883 and not after the event forgery by the cult.

The book Nazool-ul-Messih was published after the death of Mirza, therefore, it is proven that his mistakes contained in this book were not corrected by Allah SWT until his death. This together with various other absurdities exposed and his claims which fall by the way side, shows the absurdities of  Mirza’s claims and bold pronouncements that Allah SWT corrects his mistakes and bad memory in blink of an eye. There are no better proofs needed to unmask a liar, in the light of his own writings. Undeniable internal evidence from his writings is the down fall of Mirza.

Fraud and deceptions of the compilers and translator of tadkirah are apparent; they just placed all the ilhams of Ghulam Qadir’s death conveniently in the later part of the 1883 due to their subsequent knowledge for the year and perhaps also the month of Ghulam Qadir’s death.

We have also shown that Mirza never had any divine help in learning languages as he has claimed at various places. In case of English it is quite clear he was obtaining help from whatever sources available to him at any given time, similar zeal was shown to learn Hebrew language.

Mirza after making claims that he would be taught English by Allah SWT after a prayer or two ended up summoning up help even from a Hindu boy to check and translate his alleged English ilhams, which without a shadow of a doubt he has written by using the unique ways he so clearly was eager to learn for both English and Hebrew languages.

Mirza has made his god yalesh butt of all jokes, by writing such hilarious English ilhams.

All rights reserved © 2009

We turn our attention to another subject on the false hood of Mirza. Once again we intend to prove that Mirza lied as usual and he had absolutely no divine revelations.

Mirza regularly claimed that he is the second and better advent of Prophet Muhammad SAW. Mirza also claimed that Allah SWT taught him the Quran and its meaning which were forgotten by the Muslims.

Mirza’s claims of superiority

Above is the Urdu text and its English translation by Zafrullah; it is from very long paragraphs of alleged revelations, collected from different books and presented to the readers. These alleged revelations are full of plagiarism from the Quran. But for the purpose of this Article we leave that aside.

Before we move on to expose Mirza, it is worth pointing out that Zafrullah was less then honest in the translation of the paragraph produced above. Those who know Urdu can see very clearly that Zafrullah did not translate part of the sentence which says” giving you the meaning of the Quran which was forgotten by the people”. Probably Zafrullah was shy to write that people have forgotten the meaning of the Quran before Mirza. Secondly Zafrullah did not translate last part of the revelations correctly either, Mirza writes in Urdu “I am first of the believers (Momin) in this era, translated by Zafrullah as “I am the foremost of the believers.”

Further more it is also important to point out to the false notions contained in this alleged revelation. Mirza writes “to warn those people whose forefathers were ignorant i.e. not warned before.”

This statement is false on two accounts.

1-     Mirza mostly was preaching to the Muslims in Punjab, trying to convert them towards Quadianiat. His notion is completely false against the Muslims of his era. Their forefathers were off course warned that’s why they were Muslims. Is this heretic wanted to say that Prophet Muhammad SAW was not a Warner? Off course they already had teachings of Prophet Muhammad SAW and the Holy Quran. Therefore, this notion by Mirza is completely and utterly baseless.

2-     If in this passage he meant for Hindus, even then Quadianis face two major problems.

A-    Mirza himself claimed that he is the second coming of “Krishna”. He at other places also tried to proof that “Krishna” was declared a Prophet of God by Hadiths traditions of “the Black” Prophet. Therefore, if Krishna was a Prophet according to Mirza then forefathers of Hindus were off course warned by Allah SWT. We are not dealing with this topic in this article therefore; we leave the soundness of that Hadith for some other time.

B-    How many Hindus were converted by Mirza to his Quadianiat? Does it means he failed miserably in his mission?

We leave it here and turn back to the main purpose of our article; to expose the claims of Mirza that he was taught Quran by Allah SWT and also his false notion that people forgot the meaning of the Holy Quran.

Miracles should not be discounted

22 January 1906

Miracles,

Hadarath Maulvi Mohammad Ahsan Sahib read part of his Tafsir for the first Book of the Holy Quran. This narration contained verses on Miracles. (No Verses mentioned therefore, no way of knowing)

Hadarat (Mirza) answered; the nature’s laws do not remain the same, but the Word of Khuda Talla (again this horrid word) is always true. Before Naturists (we think Mirza means Scientists) use to think that the sky (heaven) rotate and the earth (does not) rotate. But after research the results are different. It is not good to stick to something as Word of God. Human can not reach (understand) to the reality of everything. To deny miracles on the basis that we have never experienced such thing, is not a good practice. Human do not know all the Laws of the Nature.

Note from Compiler; correction the word not was omitted due to typo error, the sentence should be read as “Earth is static”. (Badar V2 N4 P2)

We find this paragraph completely and utterly smack of any intelligence. A man who has made numerous lofty claims about him being the mightiest of all human and Prophet (nauzobillah) receiving the knowledge from Allah SWT and also being taught Quran by Allah SWT showing such a fundamental errors on the facts which were revealed to Prophet Muhammad SAW 1300 years before Mirza?

Mirza was following the Jewish teachings

We have maintained from our first article that Mirza teachings were a throw back of earliest Judaism. Here he once again demonstrated his thinking based on old Jewish scriptures and writings. Instead of Quran; Mirza was following the teachings of the Old Testament.

Flat Earth in Ezekiel 7: 2 ‘An end! The end has come upon the four corners of the land.

Further evidence that the Earth is static and sun (i.e. The Sky as Mirza put it) orbit the earth.

Joshua 10:12-13 Then spake Joshua to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou, Moon, in the valley of Ajalon.
And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.

Further evidence from the Bible that Sun rotate around earth; Sun went even backward by Ten Degrees.

2 King 20:11 So Isaiah the prophet cried out to the LORD, and He brought the shadow ten degrees backward, by which it had gone down on the sundial of Ahaz.

Mirza made lofty claims all through his life. Claims of to be being the best of the creation and best manifestation of God.

There are many who continue to defame Prophet Muhammad SAW and level bogus charges on the accuracy of the Noble Quran. We Muslims can answer and respond to every academic objection raised against Quran without difficulties but there is little or no point to respond to those whose sole purpose is to spread malicious and false accusations.

The irony is some Christian’s sites with an agenda to malign Islam make lame excuses for those verses in the Bible, which are completely against the scientific evidence.

The purpose of this Blog is to concentrate on the writings of Mirza; therefore, we keep our focus on the task in hand.

Lesson for Quadiani followers

Quadiani always bring Laws of Physics or Laws of the Nature in to the discussions when for example discussing the descend of Isa As or Miraj. They should not contradict Mirza; he categorically said that human can not understand all the Laws of the nature or Laws of Physics.

Mirza was not equal to the dirt of Prophet SAW’s feet

We come to the real reason for this brief article. Quadianis always try to prove that Mirza was intelligent or mightiest of all the Messengers of Allah SWT (nauzobillah) based on the lies of Mirza.

This passage also shows Mirza’s lack of understanding of the Quranic revelations.

Even though he has made bold claims in this regard, but it is apparent from deeper study of his writings that he lacked even very basic understanding and knowledge of the Quran.

Quranic evidence for the solar system

First of all Quran in Surah Ya-Sin, described perfectly that the Earth rotates as well as the Moon and the Sun, according to the Laws set out by Allah SWT.

36:40 (ASAD) [and] neither may the sun overtake the moon, nor can the night usurp the time of day, since all of them float through space [in accordance with Our laws].

Quran has even more miraculous verse, which states, Sun has it orbit too; it is following a path laid down by Allah SWT.

36:38 And [they have a sign in] the sun: it runs in an orbit of its own [and] that is laid down by the will of the Almighty, the All-Knowing;

There had been confusion on the meaning of this verse. The critics of Islam in the past have taken this verse and used it as a tool to belittle Prophet Muhammad SAW and Quran. But this is one of the most miraculous verses of the Quran. Until recently it was not known to the mankind that Sun has its own orbit. But this verse does not only point to the fact that sun runs in its own orbit but even a bigger fact, which is now proven scientifically with the advancement in this field of the Science. Even though Quran is not the book of Science but Allah SWT has disclosed plenty of Scientific facts in short and precise verses. These facts were not known to human until recently, let alone someone having this knowledge 14 hundreds year ago.

To explain the full meaning we quote the commentary by Asad on this verse;

“In the generally-accepted reading, this phrase is spelled li-mustaqarrin laha, which may be rendered as above or, more conventionally, as “to its point of rest”, i.e., the time (or point) of the daily sunset (Razi). However, Abd Allah ibn Mas’ud is reliably reported to have read these words as la mustaqarra laha (Zamakhshari), which gives us the meaning of “it runs [on its course] without having any rest”, i.e., unceasingly. (Quran Ref: 36:38)

We produced above quote to demonstrate that Muslims knew the true meaning of this verse hundreds of years ago. Well before Mirza ever walked on this earth. Therefore, according to Zamakhshari, Abd Allah ibn Mas’ud reported that this word gives the meaning of “its runs (on its course) without having any rest.

21:33 and [fail to see that] it is He who has created the night and the day and the sun and the moon – all of them floating through space!

This verse is another proof that Allah SWT has informed us all that the sun and the moon and all other planets with in our solar system are floating or moving through space. Read these two verses together and an amazing picture for the majesty of the Noble Quran comes to light. 36:38 Points that the sun running to its course, laid down by Allah SWT and 21:33 all of them are floating through space.

أ31:29 Art thou not aware that it is God who makes the night grow longer by shortening the day, and makes the day grow longer by shortening the night, and that He has made the sun and the moon subservient [to His laws], each running its course for a term set [by Him] and that God is fully aware of all that you do?

This verse in Surah Luqman , not only tell us that Sun and Moon are running their course for a term set by Allah SWT but also tell us about the tilth of the Earth which is the reason we experience seasons and shortening of the day light in the winter and lengthening of the day light in the Summer.

Scientific Proof for the drift of the solar system

We produce evidence from the book “Drifting of the Sun’s family” by a Harvard academic A.K. Bartlett. This book and data is released Courtesy Maria Mitchell observatory and provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System.

On pages 537/538 Bartlett writes;

The part of the heavens, toward which it is believed the Sun with its entire family of planets, comets, satellites and meteor-streams, including of course, our own Earth, is moving with great velocity, is situated at this season directly overhead about 6 o’clock

In the evening, and at a later hour a little farther toward the northwest. This is one of the most interesting and important localities in the firmament to astronomers, toward which their attention and observation have been directed for many years past.

The greatest fact which modern astronomy has revealed is that our whole solar system is now journey toward the constellation Lyra in the northern heavens, and the greatest of the unsolved problems of astronomy is when, where, and how this journey began, and when, where and how it will end. This journey is unceasing and unchanging, and is believed to be at the rate of twelve miles per second, or about 300,000,000 miles in a year.  The question as to whence we came and whither we are drifting is one of vast importance, and is still engaging the attention, as it has in the past, of the leading astronomers of the world, for in connection with it is involved the even greater question, as it has in the past, of the leading astronomers of the world, for in connection with it is involved the even greater question regarding the structure, extent and boundary of the universe.

If we look up to the sky, directly overhead, just after sunset we shall se a star of the first magnitude known as Vega, which is located in the constellation Lyra, the Harp and is plainly visible throughout most of the evening. This star next to Capella, is the brightest north of the equator, and is famous as being the one which, in 12000 years will occupy the important position of the “pole-star,” and will be known by that name in the future. The star shines with a bluish white light, and may be easily recognized, as it is the most conspicuous of any star visible near the zenith at this seasons.

It is an amazing fact that Quran in very simple and brief manner pointed to these scientific facts. These facts at the time of Quranic revelations were only known to the Creator Allah SWT, as human knowledge and understanding at that time could not comprehend these issues.

Another point worth mentioning is that Prophet Muhammad SAW never made any big claims on these amazing facts revealed in the Quran. Quran itself asks us to reflect on its contents and ponder. We want to keep the discussion focus on the claims, writings and teachings of Mirza. Starting debate with the followers of other Scriptures is not our intention. This blog is created for the sole purpose to expose Mirza’s writings.

Reasons behind Mirza’s quotations

After exposing Mirza’s lack of knowledge of Quranic teachings, we move to the reason why Mirza said that scientists are proving “Earth rotates”.

On 3^rd February 1851 a French physicist Leon Foucault conducted an experiment to his colleague, he was then asked by Prince Louise Bonaparte to give a public demonstration on the rotation of the Earth. We quote from Wikipedia;

In 1851, he provided the first experimental demonstration of the rotation of the Earth on its axis (see diurnal motion). This was achieved by considering the rotation of the plane of oscillation of a freely suspended, long and heavy pendulum in the Pantheon in Paris. The experiment caused a sensation in both the learned and popular worlds. In the following year he used (and named) the gyroscope as a conceptually simpler experimental proof.

Near to the time of this Quote in 1906 by Mirza, in 1902 E. Hall at Harvard University conducted an experiment to drop 948 balls from a height of 23 meters. He predicted 1.8mm eastward deviation but achieved a 1.5mm deviation. This experiment also showed a slight southward deviation too.

The Scientific concept and prove of rotation of the Earth was first established by Nicholas Copernicus. His work De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (on the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres) was published in 1543 just before his death. He established heliocentric model, he demonstrated that motions of celestial objects can be explained without putting the Earth at the centre of the universe. A previously widely held opinion. (source Wikipedia)

Other notable people who work in this field were Galileo and Newton, before the experiment by the French man quoted above.

It is worth pointing to the fate of Galileo when he tried to get permission from Pope Urban VIII to publish a comparison of Ptolemaic and the findings of Copernicus despite prohibition from the Church. He worked on “Dialogue on the two world chief system”. His purpose was to prove infinite space and earth is just another planet, rather then the archaic idea based on the teachings of the Old Testament dogma that the Earth is the centre of the Universe.

During the inquisition trial on 22^nd June 1632, Galileo obediently declared;

I, Galileo, son of the late Vincenzio Galilei, Florentine, aged seventy years, arraigned personally before this tribunal and kneeling before you, Most eminent and Lord Cardinals Inquisitors-General against heretical pravity throughout the entire Christian Commonwealth, having before my eyes and touching with my hands the Holy Gospels, swear that I have always believed, do believe, and with God’s help will in the future believe all that is held, preached and taught by the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. But, whereas, after an injunction had been lawfully intimated to me by this Holy Office to the effect that I must altogether abandon the false opinion that the sun is the center of the world and immobile, and that the earth is not the center of the world and moves, and that I must not hold, defend, or teach, in any way, verbally or in writing, the said false doctrine, and after it had been notified to me that the said doctrine was contrary to Holy Scripture, I wrote and printed a book in which I treated this new doctrine already condemned and brought forth arguments in its favor without presenting any solution for them, I have been judged to be vehemently suspected of heresy, that is, of having held and believed that the sun is the center of the world and immobile and that the earth is not the center and moves.

Therefore, desiring to remove from the minds of Your Eminences, and of all faithful Christians, this vehement suspicion rightly conceived against me, with sincere heart and un-pretended faith I abjure, curse, and detest the aforesaid errors and heresies and also every other error, error and sect whatever, contrary to the Holy Church, and I swear that in the future I will never again say or assert verbally or in writing, anything that might cause a similar suspicion toward me; further, should I know any heretic or person suspected of heresy, I will denounce him to this Holy Office or to the Inquisitor or Ordinary of the place where I may be.

There is absolutely no doubt that despite clear cut Verses in the Holy Quran almost a thousand years before the time of Galileo, the Church held this false notion that Earth is centre of the Universe and immovable. To impose this view the Church suppressed Scientific and Astronomical research. We leave it here.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that Mirza was referring to this scientific research at the time of his quote, while stating the widely held earlier view of static earth based on Old Testament teachings.

The fact of the matter is that he completely ignored the evidence contained in the Holy Quran of rotation of the Earth and other celestial bodies in our Solar System.

We have also countered Mirza’s false notion that according to the alleged revelations to him, people have forgotten the teachings of the Holy Quran. We shown the example of Abd Allah ibn Mas’ud RA from the Quranic Tafsir by Asad to demonstrate that correct meanings of these verses was very well known to the Muslims from the time of Prophet Muhammad SAW. Abd Allah ibn Mas’ud RA was the 6^th person converted to Islam. His (RA) understanding could have only come directly from Prophet SAW.

Mirza was not a recipient of divine revelations; he was a habitual liar, who was in the habit to make lofty claims. A close examination of his claims shows his true colors and personality; making his lofty claims hallow and striping him of any credibility whatsoever.

This is the main purpose of our Blog to strip Mirza completely and show to our readers, that he concocted his revelations based on developments in his era or going through the writings of others and finding whatever suited his purpose, and then twisting those writings to use it for his own claims.

All rights reserved © 2009

 It is quite common knowledge that Quadiani cult does not allow marriage with the Muslims. Some argue that this instruction was given by Mirza; some attribute this to the second Ka-Lip. For the purpose of this article we are not concerned who is responsible for this rule in this cult. But the fact of the matter is that this practice is adopted by the cult.

Recently there had been chatter that Ka-Lip V has sanctioned marriage by Quadianis to the Non-Muslims. We are not a fan of the Ka-Lip V but it is our considered opinion that he is nothing extraordinary or radical compare to elders of his cult. He is following on the foot steps of his cult founders; fortunately they are going astray from the teachings of the Quran, which suits us Muslims perfectly well. But then it is nothing new to this heretical cult. They are masters of distortions, deceptions and lies.

In this article our aim is to expose this practice of Quadiani cult and demonstrate that they act against the Quranic decrees on Muslim’s marriage with non-believers. They claimed to be true Muslims, they also claim to be adherent to the teachings of the Quran.

Marriage with Muslims

Our main aim in this article is not to discuss the marriages of Quadianis with the Muslims but to expose heresy of the cult against the Quran. We need first to demonstrate this cult’s attitude for marriage with the Muslims.

Al-Hukam states in its Dec 1920 publication;

Ahmedis can marry non-Ahmedi girl(s) because it is permissible to marry women belonging to the people of the book(s); it may result in her enlightenment. But our girls should not be given to non-Ahmedis, but we can take their girls.

 Ka-LipII writes in his book “Malaika-tullah”

The fifth tenet (of Quadianis) is binding on my sect that you should not give your daughters to the non-Ahmedis. Anyone gives his daughter to a non-Ahmedi does not understand Ahmadiat. Do you find non-Ahmedis giving their daughters to the Hindus or Christians? Non-Ahmedis according to our faith are Kafirs, but they are better then us in this respect. In spite of being Kaffirs themselves, they do not give their daughters to Kaffirs but you despite being Ahmedis give your daughters to non-believers.

 It is quite obvious that this Cult considers Muslims as Kaffirs and does not allow marriage with the Muslims. We consider it to be blessing in disguise. But as stated earlier, this is not the main purpose of this article; we may visit this avenue in the future.

The critics and even the Lahoris blame Ka-lip II for introductions of these ideas in to Quadianiat. We disagree strongly; we have absolutely no doubt that the heresies of Ka-Lip II are based on the lies and deceptions of Mirza.

 Mirza verdict on deniers of Quran

 Mirza in Ruhani Khazain V22 writes;

Mirza in response to a Question responded;

Q: Hazoor written in thousands of places, calling the recites of the Kalima and those who pray towards the Qibla as Kaffirs is not correct practice. It is apparent that by not accepting you no one can become Kaffir except those who denounce you as Kaffir. But you have written to Abdul Hakim Khan that any one who receives my claims but does not accept me is not Muslim. There is contradiction in this statement and statements in earlier books. In Taryaq-e-Qulub you wrote no one become Kaffir by not accepting me. But now you write that one becomes Kaffir by denying me.

 

A: It is strange that you consider the one who calls me Kaffir and the one who does not accept my claims two different people. Even though for Khuda there are of the same kind. Because anyone who does not accept me; does not accept me because he considers me as a liar. But Allah Talla (SWT) decreed that anyone who lies against the Word of Khuda (SWT) is worse then Kaffirs. It is decreed in Quran (quoted from Surah A’raf V37) that there are two grand Kafirs; one which associate lies to Allah SWT, second one which insults Word of Khuda (SWT). In this situation I am not only Kafir but a Grand Kaffir. But if I am not a liar then this Kuffar would be on my accuser.

 Mirza in the foot note clarified his answer further, he writes;

 Cruel here means Kaffir, the one who make fun of Word of Allah (Quran) compare to a liar is called cruel. With out any doubt the one who make fun of Word of Allah (Quran) is a Kaffir. Therefore; one who does not recognize me and declare me a Kaffir by considering me a liar, he is a Kaffir by denying me.

We can safely conclude that according to Mirza the one who make fun of the Word of Allah SWT is the Biggest Kaffir. We will also examine Mirza’s logic that anyone who consider him a liar and thus declare him a Kaffir is performing Kufar.

This proves that it was Mirza who has declared Muslims as Kaffir; Ka-lip II was only reiterating the point to his followers and he indeed did not coined these phrases for the Muslims.

Quranic evidence for the deniers of Word of Allah SWT

7:37 (Asad) And who could be more wicked than they who attribute their own lying inventions to God or give the lie to His messages? Whatever has been decreed to be their lot [in life] will be theirs -till there shall come _ unto them Our messengers to cause them to die, [and] shall say, “Where, now, are those beings whom you were wont to invoke beside God?” And [those sinners] will reply, “They have forsaken us!” -and [thus] they will bear witness against themselves that they had been denying the truth.

We intend to show to our readers that this Ka-lip II was a denier of Word of Allah SWT and he is guilty of the heresies which his father falsely accuse the Muslims. There is no better way then to expose a liar in his own words and by evidence from the sources of this cult. We will also prove that Mahmud indeed was a Muftri and Muslims rightly reject this cult as bunch of heretic and deniers of the Word of Allah SWT, the Holy Quran. We have the words of Mirza stated above and we intend to prove that according to his father’s logic and teachings Mahmud was a Kaffir indeed.

 Marriage to Hindus allowed in Islam?

Mahmud writes; According to Islam marriage is allowed with a Hindu and Jewish girl. Even though it is not a practice at the moment. If a Muslim man marry Hindu or Jewish girl then the Muslims would pronounce him Kaffir. But in Islam such marriage is allowed. These marriages widen the relationships. It would be so nice that a Muslim loves his Grandson (from a son) as Muslim and another Hindu Grandson (from daughter) calls him with love and affection. By adopting this approach religious differences would be eliminated. Difference of color and language would be eliminated. Allah Tallah (SWT) spread the rain water to the whole earth not just a specific place. The rain even falls on canals, rivers, and on oceans, on uncultivated and cultivated land, on the Gardens and on dirty waste streams.

Before we proceed to examine the writings of Mahmud, we like to point out an absurdity of Mahmud; Qamar-ul-Anbiya “Moon of the Prophets”. Even though Mehmood started the pessage by stating that if a Muslim man marries a Hindu or Jewish girl, but in the middle of the passage, when he described grandsons, he reversed it, he called Hindu (Nawasa) Grandson, which indicate grandson from the daughter and not from the son, in Urdu language. This grandson could only result if a woman gets married with a Hindu man, not a Muslim man marrying a Hindu girl.

In essence Mehmood is claiming that the marriage of Muslims girls with Hindu men is also allowed in Islam.

Quranic evidence against Mehmud

2:221 AND DO NOT marry women who ascribe divinity to aught beside God ere they attain to [true] belief: for any believing bondwoman [of God] is certainly better than a woman who ascribes divinity to aught beside God, even though she please you greatly. And do not give your women in marriage to men who ascribe divinity to aught beside God ere they attain to [true] belief: for- any believing bondman [of God] is certainly better than a man who ascribes divinity to aught beside God, even though he pleases you greatly. [Such as] these invite unto the fire, whereas God invites unto paradise, and unto [the achievement of] forgiveness by His leave; and He makes clear His messages unto mankind, so that they might bear them in mind.

It is quite clear from Quranic evidence that marriage to “Mushrik” women is not permissible for Muslim men.

Not only that Quran forbid the marriage with Mushriks, but clarify that those who ascribe divinity to anyone except Allah SWT are Mushriks. This Verse also forbids giving Muslim women in marriage to Mushrik men. Therefore, Quranic decree is against both lies of Mehmood in above quoted paragraph from his writings.

Allah SWT ordered that Muslims should investigate before Marriage to the women who have converted to Islam.

60:10 O YOU who have attained to faith! Whenever believing women come unto you, forsaking the domain of evil, examine them, [although only] God is fully aware of their faith; and if you have thus ascertained that they are believers, do not send them back to the deniers of the truth, [since] they are [no longer] lawful to their erstwhile husbands, and these are [no longer] lawful to them. None the less, you shall return to them whatever they have spent [on their wives by way of dower]; and [then, O believers,] you will be committing no sin if you marry them after giving them their dowers. On the other hand, hold not to the marriage-tie with women who [continue to] deny the truth, and ask but for [the return of] whatever you have spent [by way of dower] -just as they [whose wives have gone over to you] have the right to demand.

Quranic decree makes it obligatory on Muslim men that if believing women come unto them for the purpose of the Marriage; if these women belonged to some group of non-believers or Musrhiks in other words. They should investigate their claims that they have attained to faith. Even though what is in their hearts only known to Allah SWT but He SWT still make obligatory for the Muslims to do investigation and satisfy themselves of their status as believers. If they do duty they are assigned by Allah SWT in this Quranic decree then no blame is attached to them. Allah SWT knows what is in the hearts of the hypocrites if they do not believe on what they pronounce.

This Verse also decreed that once these women attained to the faith and become Muslims they are not lawful to their previous partners who are non-believers or Mushriks. Therefore, clear cut decree by Allah SWT those Muslim women can not marry or remain in marriage to men who are not believers or are Mushriks.

We Muslims know very well that Hindus worship different deities, and Shirk and Kuffar according to Quranic definitions is prevalent practice among them.

Quranic decree is very unambiguous; we Muslims are not allowed to marry anyone who does not believe in the Unity of Allah SWT and/or worship any idol.

Hypocrisy by the Cult

Funnily enough this cult is full of hypocrites we have exposed hypocrisy of Ka-LipII that he accuses Muslims but he conveniently forgot the writings of his father and founder of this cult.

But their hypocrisy is not limited to the Ka-Lip II. We find these gems on their official web site. In the web edition of the book Pathway to Paradise; the writer stated;

Islam also makes clear whom a Muslim is allowed to marry as far as his/her religion is concerned. Marriage with an idolater is totally forbidden (see Holy Qur’an, 2:222) for both sexes. However, men are allowed to marry women of the “people of the Book” (i.e., those who follow a revealed scripture), although it is not considered preferable.

We humbly request such writers that they should research teachings of their founders before writings such passages. Do these ignorant people realise that they are destroying the credibility of their own cult?

We can only thank the writer to prove Mehmud as Kazzab and a Kaffir by acting against the decree of the Quran the Word of Allah SWT.

Conclusions

 We have demonstrated that Mehmud was a liar and a heretic to claim that Islam allows marriage to the Hindus.

We have also proven conclusively that Mehmud was a Muftri according to the conditions and tests set out by his father in the quoted passage from his book It also proves conclusively that Mehmud was a non-believer and a Kaffir who did not believe in the Word of Allah SWT; he did not followed the decrees in the Quran and declared marriage with Hindus permissible against the Word of Allah SWT.

All we can say is that good luck to Masroor; he is doing nothing extraordinary but following the teachings of this cult’s founders. We are glad that these heretics do not allow marriages with the Muslims. After all those who allow marriages to the non-believers disobeying Allah SWT, what they have to do with Islam and Muslims?

All rights reserved © 2009